@metal-brain said
Somebody claimed there was not enough voter fraud to affect the outcome of the election. That person did not say dead people and neither did I. Nobody thinks only dead people changed the outcome.
Topics change as did here. It isn't my fault you didn't read properly. Learn to read next time. I clearly said voter fraud in response, not dead people alone. Only an idiot would claim only one form of voter fraud happened.
Nobody thinks only dead people changed the outcome.
Other than "orange man said so" I'm straining to see how anyone thinks anyone changed the outcome. Fraud at the level you are suggesting would be statistically impossible to pull off without being discovered. Again, that's why these cases were so uniformly dismissed as "without merit" in court.
1 edit
@metal-brain said"I'm just saying we don't have a way of knowing" is such a lame cop-out argument for contesting the results of an election. Is there any way to find out or are we just spinning our wheels here?
Certain elections have been overturned because of voter fraud. Ask no1 since he informed me of it.
I never claimed to know how much voter fraud there is, just that nobody else does either.
Rudy Giuliani in front of a judge saying "we have no way of knowing if this man was murdered or not, but assume he was and we'll blame [scanning the audience, scanning the audience, pointing indiscriminately] that guy over there for his death."
@wildgrass saidBecause he's a liberal.
Is there any way to find out or are we just spinning our wheels here?
Rudy Giuliani in front of a judge saying "we have no way of knowing if this man was murdered or not, but assume he was and we'll blame [scanning the audience, scanning the audience, pointing indiscriminately] that guy over there for his death."