Go back
mueller weakness...

mueller weakness...

Debates


is this really what the dem party has become
?


http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/07/26/robert-mueller-using-trump-tweets-evidence-times-says-turley-responds


Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
is this really what the dem party has become
?


http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/07/26/robert-mueller-using-trump-tweets-evidence-times-says-turley-responds
In all honesty, though, it can be relevant to contextualize other evidence. It is highly doubtful that his case actually hinges on tweets -- and if it did, then, of course, you'd be entirely right to view this as a joke.

There's no actual case, though, so I think it's just media finding a reason to write an article by claiming that this is very relevant.

2 edits

Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
is this really what the dem party has become
?


http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/07/26/robert-mueller-using-trump-tweets-evidence-times-says-turley-responds
Muller is a Republican lying dumb arse; so is Rosenstein. Both apointted by Trump. LOL
aaa DUHhhh!!! 🙄


Originally posted by @philokalia
In all honesty, though, it can be relevant to contextualize other evidence. It is highly doubtful that his case actually hinges on tweets -- and if it did, then, of course, you'd be entirely right to view this as a joke.

There's no actual case, though, so I think it's just media finding a reason to write an article by claiming that this is very relevant.
There's "No case" for Trump obstructing justice?

Right wingers really live in a bubble of their own preconceptions.


Originally posted by @no1marauder
There's "No case" for Trump obstructing justice?

Right wingers really live in a bubble of their own preconceptions.
Presumably this is the kind of thing Wajoma calls "dream feelings".


Originally posted by @suzianne
Presumably this is the kind of thing Wajoma calls "dream feelings".
Kinda like Carlos Castaneda.....

1 edit

Since, augmented by Trump's tweets, the case for a Trump impeachment is air-tight... I guess Republicans should stomp on the accelerator and get as much done under Trump as possible. Then, they can roll out the red carpet for Mike Pence and everyone will be happy. Nguyen-Nguyen?

Be careful what you wish for. Federally-legalized abortion is important to the Democrats? Right? 😉


Originally posted by @no1marauder
There's "No case" for Trump obstructing justice?

Right wingers really live in a bubble of their own preconceptions.
Firing Comey is not proof of obstruction of justice. That is merely your perception based on paranoia. Suspicion is not proof.


Originally posted by @metal-brain
Firing Comey is not proof of obstruction of justice. That is merely your perception based on paranoia. Suspicion is not proof.
Given the evidential basis for your comments in thread Thread 177704 (puppet government theory), that statement is somewhat breathtaking.


Originally posted by @deepthought
Given the evidential basis for your comments in thread Thread 177704 (puppet government theory), that statement is somewhat breathtaking.
I don't see why you are concluding that. Trump said he fired Comey because it was a witch hunt. It is entirely possible that Trump got fed up with Comey ruining people's lives in a feeble attempt to impeach Trump.
All you have is the mere possibility of obstruction of justice. That is NOT evidence. It is however, a conspiracy theory. I like entertaining conspiracy theories, but this one is based on myths like proof of Russian hacking that does not exist unless Russian hackers are incompetent. It just doesn't make sense except in the world of a leftist Trump hater.


Originally posted by @metal-brain
I don't see why you are concluding that. Trump said he fired Comey because it was a witch hunt. It is entirely possible that Trump got fed up with Comey ruining people's lives in a feeble attempt to impeach Trump.
All you have is the mere possibility of obstruction of justice. That is NOT evidence. It is however, a conspiracy theory. I like entertainin ...[text shortened]... ackers are incompetent. It just doesn't make sense except in the world of a leftist Trump hater.
Lester Holt interview. Trump stated precisely, why he fired Comey.


Originally posted by @metal-brain
I don't see why you are concluding that. Trump said he fired Comey because it was a witch hunt. It is entirely possible that Trump got fed up with Comey ruining people's lives in a feeble attempt to impeach Trump.
All you have is the mere possibility of obstruction of justice. That is NOT evidence. It is however, a conspiracy theory. I like entertainin ...[text shortened]... ackers are incompetent. It just doesn't make sense except in the world of a leftist Trump hater.
You like conspiracy theories... but not actual conspiracies, such as the conspiracy against the United States that took place on June 9, 2016 in Trump Tower.

1 edit

Originally posted by @wolfe63
Lester Holt interview. Trump stated precisely, why he fired Comey.
Ironic now to hear him say Comey said he was not under investigation.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @tom-wolsey
Since, augmented by Trump's tweets, the case for a Trump impeachment is air-tight... I guess Republicans should stomp on the accelerator and get as much done under Trump as possible. Then, they can roll out the red carpet for Mike Pence and everyone will be happy. Nguyen-Nguyen?

Be careful what you wish for. Federally-legalized abortion is important to the Democrats? Right? 😉
Pence gave a speech on religious freedom the other day.

Warming up in the bullpen ?? 😀


Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
You like conspiracy theories... but not actual conspiracies, such as the conspiracy against the United States that took place on June 9, 2016 in Trump Tower.
There was no conspiracy at all. Don Jr. was duped by a liar and no conspiring took place at all.

You are using weird logic.