27 Jul 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleIn all honesty, though, it can be relevant to contextualize other evidence. It is highly doubtful that his case actually hinges on tweets -- and if it did, then, of course, you'd be entirely right to view this as a joke.
is this really what the dem party has become
?
http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/07/26/robert-mueller-using-trump-tweets-evidence-times-says-turley-responds
There's no actual case, though, so I think it's just media finding a reason to write an article by claiming that this is very relevant.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleMuller is a Republican lying dumb arse; so is Rosenstein. Both apointted by Trump. LOL
is this really what the dem party has become
?
http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/07/26/robert-mueller-using-trump-tweets-evidence-times-says-turley-responds
aaa DUHhhh!!! 🙄
Originally posted by @philokaliaThere's "No case" for Trump obstructing justice?
In all honesty, though, it can be relevant to contextualize other evidence. It is highly doubtful that his case actually hinges on tweets -- and if it did, then, of course, you'd be entirely right to view this as a joke.
There's no actual case, though, so I think it's just media finding a reason to write an article by claiming that this is very relevant.
Right wingers really live in a bubble of their own preconceptions.
Originally posted by @no1marauderPresumably this is the kind of thing Wajoma calls "dream feelings".
There's "No case" for Trump obstructing justice?
Right wingers really live in a bubble of their own preconceptions.
Since, augmented by Trump's tweets, the case for a Trump impeachment is air-tight... I guess Republicans should stomp on the accelerator and get as much done under Trump as possible. Then, they can roll out the red carpet for Mike Pence and everyone will be happy. Nguyen-Nguyen?
Be careful what you wish for. Federally-legalized abortion is important to the Democrats? Right? 😉
27 Jul 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderFiring Comey is not proof of obstruction of justice. That is merely your perception based on paranoia. Suspicion is not proof.
There's "No case" for Trump obstructing justice?
Right wingers really live in a bubble of their own preconceptions.
Originally posted by @metal-brainGiven the evidential basis for your comments in thread Thread 177704 (puppet government theory), that statement is somewhat breathtaking.
Firing Comey is not proof of obstruction of justice. That is merely your perception based on paranoia. Suspicion is not proof.
27 Jul 18
Originally posted by @deepthoughtI don't see why you are concluding that. Trump said he fired Comey because it was a witch hunt. It is entirely possible that Trump got fed up with Comey ruining people's lives in a feeble attempt to impeach Trump.
Given the evidential basis for your comments in thread Thread 177704 (puppet government theory), that statement is somewhat breathtaking.
All you have is the mere possibility of obstruction of justice. That is NOT evidence. It is however, a conspiracy theory. I like entertaining conspiracy theories, but this one is based on myths like proof of Russian hacking that does not exist unless Russian hackers are incompetent. It just doesn't make sense except in the world of a leftist Trump hater.
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
Originally posted by @metal-brainLester Holt interview. Trump stated precisely, why he fired Comey.
I don't see why you are concluding that. Trump said he fired Comey because it was a witch hunt. It is entirely possible that Trump got fed up with Comey ruining people's lives in a feeble attempt to impeach Trump.
All you have is the mere possibility of obstruction of justice. That is NOT evidence. It is however, a conspiracy theory. I like entertainin ...[text shortened]... ackers are incompetent. It just doesn't make sense except in the world of a leftist Trump hater.
Originally posted by @metal-brainYou like conspiracy theories... but not actual conspiracies, such as the conspiracy against the United States that took place on June 9, 2016 in Trump Tower.
I don't see why you are concluding that. Trump said he fired Comey because it was a witch hunt. It is entirely possible that Trump got fed up with Comey ruining people's lives in a feeble attempt to impeach Trump.
All you have is the mere possibility of obstruction of justice. That is NOT evidence. It is however, a conspiracy theory. I like entertainin ...[text shortened]... ackers are incompetent. It just doesn't make sense except in the world of a leftist Trump hater.
27 Jul 18
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyPence gave a speech on religious freedom the other day.
Since, augmented by Trump's tweets, the case for a Trump impeachment is air-tight... I guess Republicans should stomp on the accelerator and get as much done under Trump as possible. Then, they can roll out the red carpet for Mike Pence and everyone will be happy. Nguyen-Nguyen?
Be careful what you wish for. Federally-legalized abortion is important to the Democrats? Right? 😉
Warming up in the bullpen ?? 😀
28 Jul 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraThere was no conspiracy at all. Don Jr. was duped by a liar and no conspiring took place at all.
You like conspiracy theories... but not actual conspiracies, such as the conspiracy against the United States that took place on June 9, 2016 in Trump Tower.
You are using weird logic.