@zahlanzi saidActually it is my brother's grandaughter, I try to not put a lot of 'superfluous' in posts, for fear of sounding like a flowery liberal. Plus, it makes easier reading, after you have just come off of a Sonhouse post. Dammed if I do, dammed if I don't. Difficult to get a break around here.
What is your fictional, entirely made up granddaughter's name? What sport is she hypothetically playing. Do little girls playing that sport know your granddaughter is imaginary and therefore has an unfair advantage over them?
But , 2 stars for figuring me out, and ratting me out!...just like when Suzianne nails someone for a mistype! Funny what you libs find important in posts.
As to what sport, don't know that yet, and she hasn't yet had to view hairy ass in her sweet little dressing room.
Hey, did you see where Suzianne is heading your way to live under socialism, be controlled by socialists...people like me, I guess. Show her the ropes, where to pick up her govt checks, etc.
@AverageJoe1
If there can be no women's sports then we should go all the way and ban ALL sports male and female because you can never know when one of those dreaded trans folks will sneak in and kick but because the former female was WAY better than the men she played against.
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidYou're really obsessed with this "everybody can work hard enough to support themselves, educate their families, and acquire income-producing assets" idea, aren't you? You insert it into absolutely everything you talk about here in this forum.
Why all the 'change' in the works to retool our society? Which 'group' will it favor? I say that it will favor people who do not work as hard as others work.
Am I wrong?
@kewpie saidHard work, ,since the early settlers, is the foundation of our society. I don't get what you mean. So my position is without merit?
You're really obsessed with this "everybody can work hard enough to support themselves, educate their families, and acquire income-producing assets" idea, aren't you? You insert it into absolutely everything you talk about here in this forum.
@averagejoe1 saidYes. Obviously.
Hard work, ,since the early settlers, is the foundation of our society. I don't get what you mean. So my position is without merit?
Are you suggesting that trans people work less hard than incels?
@averagejoe1 saidYour position on that topic is well-known because you inject it into every single post. This thread has a different topic and your obsession is just plain boring.
Hard work, ,since the early settlers, is the foundation of our society. I don't get what you mean. So my position is without merit?
@mott-the-hoople saidAre you asking for some sort of confirmation of your own lifestyle, if it feels good and no one else is dragged into it just do it.
do you walk around all day with your dick in your hand?
@kevcvs57 saidNo, actually I warn that part of the weakening of our society, the greatest country, is due to more and more people become dependent on other people. 49% will eventually support the other 51%, which will lead to 48%/52%, then 47%/53%,,,,,,,it will sink under its own weight.
Are you asking for some sort of confirmation of your own lifestyle, if it feels good and no one else is dragged into it just do it.
Sorry to upset everyone, I am just trying to help those of you don't see that to get off your asses. Just how long can Shav, for instance, drive around with his top down?
@averagejoe1 saidWhat you consistently miss is that those who do the most work in our society reap the least benefits.
Hard work, ,since the early settlers, is the foundation of our society. I don't get what you mean. So my position is without merit?
I can't see how you honestly keep missing this fact.
@averagejoe1 saidIt already does, Mr. Richie Rich, who does nothing all day.
Why all the 'change' in the works to retool our society? Which 'group' will it favor? I say that it will favor people who do not work as hard as others work.
Am I wrong?