Originally posted by whodeyThere never was any proof. They just hope if they repeat it enough people will not question it. That is propaganda 101. Even Trump understands that well. He has said it before. Just watch Frontline 2 -President Trump.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/03/house-intelligence-chair-no-proof-russians-were-trying-to-get-trump-elected/
I suppose "truthiness" all boils down to who is in the Oval Office.
05 Jan 17
Originally posted by Metal BrainMSM has been repeating it non-stop as though it's not just a thang, it's a thang-thang.
There never was any proof. They just hope if they repeat it enough people will not question it. That is propaganda 101. Even Trump understands that well. He has said it before. Just watch Frontline 2 -President Trump.
What a effing joke.
NPR coughs it out like business as usual just this morning.
Nothing to see here, folks!
Move along.
Just more of that "excellent reporting" we've come to expect from "excellent reporters."
Mark my words: it's just a matter of time until ANYONE who questions the official story will be labeled not just a conspiracy theorist, but an enemy of the state.
05 Jan 17
Originally posted by whodeyYou weren't particulary interested in "thruthiness" before the election results, when you were convinced the elections were rigged so that Clinton would win.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/03/house-intelligence-chair-no-proof-russians-were-trying-to-get-trump-elected/
I suppose "truthiness" all boils down to who is in the Oval Office.
Whatever happened to that? Just another "oops" by Whodey?
06 Jan 17
More balderdash from "The Hill," as reported by NPR again this morning:
The first chip our sharp-as-knives intelligence agencies is going to throw down as not just proof positive, but proof irrefutable that Russia had hacked (ever notice how they've yet to indicate how, as in what manner, the election was hacked? Prolly just me...) comes in the form of a listening device our super sleuth spies used to record Russian spies cheering upon hearing the results of the election.
What more proof do we need, right?
I say: nuke those commie bastards post haste!
06 Jan 17
Originally posted by Great King RatIt was my opinion at the time.
You weren't particulary interested in "thruthiness" before the election results, when you were convinced the elections were rigged so that Clinton would win.
Whatever happened to that? Just another "oops" by Whodey?
So what of it?
06 Jan 17
Originally posted by Metal BrainIt's the seriousness of the charge.
There never was any proof. They just hope if they repeat it enough people will not question it. That is propaganda 101. Even Trump understands that well. He has said it before. Just watch Frontline 2 -President Trump.
06 Jan 17
Originally posted by Great King RatSo you are saying you were interested in truthiness but now that Trump has won you are not?
You weren't particulary interested in "thruthiness" before the election results, when you were convinced the elections were rigged so that Clinton would win.
Whatever happened to that? Just another "oops" by Whodey?
06 Jan 17
1 edit
Originally posted by whodeyIf "The Donald" said there was no Russian hacking, there WAS NO Russian hacking!
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/03/house-intelligence-chair-no-proof-russians-were-trying-to-get-trump-elected/
I suppose "truthiness" all boils down to who is in the Oval Office.
Your Anti American attitude has been noted Whodey. ðŸ˜
06 Jan 17
Originally posted by mchillBeyond a complete lack of evidence indicating intervention is the intervention itself.
If "The Donald" said there was no Russian hacking, there WAS NO Russian hacking!
Your Anti American attitude has been noted Whodey. ðŸ˜
What was hacked?
What in God's name was the benefit?
Why is the anti-Conservative so dead set in their obvious, clumsy efforts to change the narrative to have it reflect a 'hack?'
Weird.
06 Jan 17
Originally posted by whodeyIt wasn't your opinion at all, resident liar. You feared the Democrats would win, therefore you went with the "Trump was made the GOP candidate so Clinton would win" BS. Once Trump had won you no longer needed that idiotic story so you dumped it immediately.
It was my opinion at the time.
So what of it?
Truth and facts mean diddly-squat to you. You are by definition against "the left". If "the left" says "hot", you say "cold". If they say "yes", you say "no". If they say "rigged", you say "no way", if they say "hacked", you say "nonsense"
You couldn't care less if Russia did indeed play a part in the election outcome nor do you care what happens to America and/or the world. Your only concern is to be partisan against the Democrats.
You essentially have the mindset of a teenager.
06 Jan 17
Originally posted by Great King RatAgain, for the umpteenth time: what did they hack, what advantage was gained?
It wasn't your opinion at all, resident liar. You feared the Democrats would win, therefore you went with the "Trump was made the GOP candidate so Clinton would win" BS. Once Trump had won you no longer needed that idiotic story so you dumped it immediately.
Truth and facts mean diddly-squat to you. You are by definition against "the left". If "th ...[text shortened]... cern is to be partisan against the Democrats.
You essentially have the mindset of a teenager.
Nada.
Zilch.
Zip.
Zero.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHAsk Trump. Officials have briefed him about their findings. Cartoons were drawn to make things more clear.
Again, for the umpteenth time: what did they hack, what advantage was gained?
Nada.
Zilch.
Zip.
Zero.
http://www.vox.com/world/2017/1/6/14193942/trump-russia-hack-briefing
It's nice how Trump managed to find some time to make fun of Schwarzenegger's ratings of "The Apprentice", by the way. That's just the type of stuff the president-elect should concern himself with.
07 Jan 17
Originally posted by Great King RatSo, again, nothing.
Ask Trump. Officials have briefed him about their findings. Cartoons were drawn to make things more clear.
http://www.vox.com/world/2017/1/6/14193942/trump-russia-hack-briefing
It's nice how Trump managed to find some time to make fun of Schwarzenegger's ratings of "The Apprentice", by the way. That's just the type of stuff the president-elect should concern himself with.
- Joined
- 08 Dec 04
- Moves
- 100919
07 Jan 17
Originally posted by FreakyKBHI heard they got caught, there were two spies...Boris & Natasha
MSM has been repeating it non-stop as though it's not just a thang, it's a thang-thang.
What a effing joke.
NPR coughs it out like business as usual just this morning.
Nothing to see here, folks!
Move along.
Just more of that "excellent reporting" we've come to expect from "excellent reporters."
Mark my words: it's just a matter of time until AN ...[text shortened]... ns the official story will be labeled not just a conspiracy theorist, but an enemy of the state.