1 edit
@kevcvs57 saidkev bamboozle, I was following shag doodys lead, he was trying to make out there are more white mass shooters than there are, of course he was too lazy to research and got slapped for it. As I keep telling him, don't stray from the single emoji response you're entering the land of pain. He wanted to use the stats when they suited his racial agenda, he found out the hard way he was wrong.
I think you misunderstand vajoma I’m simply saying your a racist, nothing to do with your actual post but here you are once again lining up with the most racist characters on this forum
.
Not saying all bleeps are mass shooters, that would be racist. But there are some shocking stats regarding crimes by race that need to be addressed.
@mott-the-hoople saidYeah, once our argument gets past the truth, it falls flat.
once these libs get past personal insults, sexual innuendos and the obligatory racist claim their arguments fall flat.
Just like yours.
The problem is that your argument gets there way faster.
@averagejoe1 saidWhy does Shav not take me on about this post? Slinking away? Tell us about your changing the facts of someone else's premise.
Note here, the moronic Shav segued, modification-of-another's post. Writes modifying info.
Icing on the cake, he asks the original poster, Wjoma, " (NOW) which conclusions would you draw!!)
He changes Wajoma's clear documented post to fit his liberal slant on life, and throws it back at us!! Not even Sonhouse would fall for that.
Chalk up a win for Wajom ...[text shortened]... this afternoon, would the world be any different? How bout if it were the USA? riiiiiiiggghhtt!
@averagejoe1 saidJoe, I take you up on nearly every single post you make.
Why does Shav not take me on about this post? Slinking away? Tell us about your changing the facts of someone else's premise.
But, I have to admit, you're so pig ignorant, it bores me.
Every answer someone gives you, gets met with this sort of shenanigans: "No lib willing to answer."
But what it actually is, is that you don't like the answer.
Or you can't be bothered reading (thinking of treaties, for example).
So, people just look at you, sigh, have a glass of wine and do something more useful.
1 edit
@shavixmir saidI asked Susie and what if she were running for office and said the treasury should pay all student loans, in a small town. What would the towns people say. She did not answer.
Joe, I take you up on nearly every single post you make.
But, I have to admit, you're so pig ignorant, it bores me.
Every answer someone gives you, gets met with this sort of shenanigans: "No lib willing to answer."
But what it actually is, is that you don't like the answer.
Or you can't be bothered reading (thinking of treaties, for example).
So, people just look at you, sigh, have a glass of wine and do something more useful.
I asked Sonhouse, what if Trump was doing all of the shenanigans with money and the Chinese, 20 bank accounts,… What would he say about that, if it were Trump instead of Biden doing all of that?, He did not answer..
I asked Susie and to tell me one lie that she heard on the blaze. She has not answered
I asked Phranny to tell me where Ayn Rand said she was in favor of women being raped. She did not answer.
I asked Shav if there would be any change in the world if Netherland disappeared. He did not answer.
Go take a nap. You people are the easiest people to expose on a debate forum.
@mott-the-hoople saidMaybe you should learn to read, then.
Ive never seen you put up an argument…just one liner insults
@averagejoe1 saidYour analogies are stupid. I was told way back in Geometry class in high school, that if you start with a false premise, nothing you say after that following from that premise can be truth. Every single time you post, you start with a false premise, drawn from the latest Republican fairy tale.
I asked Susie and what if she were running for office and said the treasury should pay all student loans, in a small town. What would the towns people say. She did not answer.
I asked Sonhouse, what if Trump was doing all of the shenanigans with money and the Chinese, 20 bank accounts,… What would he say about that, if it were Trump instead of Biden doing all of that?, H ...[text shortened]... He did not answer.
Go take a nap. You people are the easiest people to expose on a debate forum.
Just so you know.
@suzianne saidI hope your response went to everyone, not just me.
Your analogies are stupid. I was told way back in Geometry class in high school, that if you start with a false premise, nothing you say after that following from that premise can be truth. Every single time you post, you start with a false premise, drawn from the latest Republican fairy tale.
Just so you know.
@averagejoe1 saidOne: I never saw that question.
I asked Susie and what if she were running for office and said the treasury should pay all student loans, in a small town. What would the towns people say. She did not answer.
I asked Sonhouse, what if Trump was doing all of the shenanigans with money and the Chinese, 20 bank accounts,… What would he say about that, if it were Trump instead of Biden doing all of that?, H ...[text shortened]... He did not answer.
Go take a nap. You people are the easiest people to expose on a debate forum.
Two: it’s so fukking stupid I wouldn’t have given you an answer on that one anyway.
1 edit
@shavixmir saidAnoher one down. Check Shav and Suzianne off, awaiting Sonhouse.....the one about what he would be raving about if Trump was being investigated for receiving $10M from the Chinee, and running it all through 20 bank accounts. So stupid, unvelievable.
One: I never saw that question.
Two: it’s so fukking stupid I wouldn’t have given you an answer on that one anyway.
The biden family is doing it, splitting it between 7 family members, and Sonhouse is being asked if he would be so quiet about it were it Trump. Why will he not answer. Then there is the question with Phranny. Libs just do not answer questions.
Ask me a question.
Query...Biden, the Chinee money..could he be compromised, so much so that he refrained from shooting down the balloon?
1 edit
@shavixmir saidShag Doody for Brains, are you ready for the mass shooting stats for May?
One: I never saw that question.
Two: it’s so fukking stupid I wouldn’t have given you an answer on that one anyway.
Here's Chunk Ugur from the TYT:
"Most of the shootings are done by out of control right wingers with these crazy ideologies, etc. Christian white males are by far the biggest demographic."
See if you can match the stat with the race, multi choice style:
1: White
2: Hispanic
3: Bleeps
Shooters
A: 80%
B: 6%
C: 14%
US racial demographics.
X: 58%
Y: 18%
Z: 12%
No Asians this month, a couple of unidentifieds.
2 edits
@wajoma saidWhere you see skin colour as the correlating factor I see poverty and deprivation, lack of life chances and the cyclical dysfunction that goes along with these factors.
kev bamboozle, I was following shag doodys lead, he was trying to make out there are more white mass shooters than there are, of course he was too lazy to research and got slapped for it. As I keep telling him, don't stray from the single emoji response you're entering the land of pain. He wanted to use the stats when they suited his racial agenda, he found out the hard way ...[text shortened]... ld be racist. But there are some shocking stats regarding crimes by race that need to be addressed.
Of course there is still some individual responsibility, but to ignore all the socioeconomic common denominators and just cite skin colour leads to a race based argument.
@kevcvs57 saidJust hold on a second, Kev. You mention poverty, deprivation, when you are all for spending, so far, about $200M in Chciago on people who have invaded our country at the souhtern border. Aliens, Mexicans, immigrants, whatever you (don't) want to call them??
Where you see skin colour as the correlating factor I see poverty and deprivation, lack of life chances and the cyclical dysfunction that goes along with these factors.
Of course there is still some individual responsibility, but to ignore all the socioeconomic common denominators and just cite skin colour leads to a race based argument.
For every $1 spent on one of those illegals, a black child goes hungry. I once said that the Mexicans would usurp all resources that are needed for the very people you write about.
The common sense in the Forum is really lacking. And posts, such as yours, are not properly thought out. Wrong, in other words.
You see, I just found the very money that is available to help those people of color that you mention, but you, like Sue, will come back with a smarty pants comment. Yawn