31 May '09 00:19>
Originally posted by FMFYes. Any time, big or small, when I am forced to pay for something, or do something I would not do simply because it is rational to do so, then that force has diminished my liberty.
And this is part of your definition of "lack of freedom"?
It isn't a question of whether the mandated activity or goal is good, bad or indifferent. If it is not my choice, someone else is confiscating my money and deciding what to do with it. It is the same as if a crackhead robs me to support his or her habit. To them my money is better spent on their habit. To me, it is simply theft.
This is especially true when the money is a direct transfer from one group to another unrelated group, such as from smokers to children's health care. You might be able to make a case for smoker's money paying for care of smoker's ailments, or cessation programs.