Go back
Obama Lifts 'Gag Rule' on Family-Planning Groups

Obama Lifts 'Gag Rule' on Family-Planning Groups

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Just like taking out an appendix is.
No, an organ is not the same as the body of a new beginning human being ... with a DNA code of itself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
No, an organ is not the same as the body of a new beginning human being ... with a DNA code of itself.
The germs that cause bad breath have their own DNA code; can I use Listerine without facing a prison term?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Obama made a specific promise during his campaign to end the global "gag rule". So far, he's been keeping his explicit promises. If people didn't like his campaign promises, they should have voted against him.
I wonder how he is going to "reach out" to the Reps to reduce the number of abortions ? Has he made any comments or decisions concerning this promise yet ?

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
The germs that cause bad breath have their own DNA code; can I use Listerine without facing a prison term?
Hopping from one thing ( ... a human organ ) to the other ( ... some germ, not the body of a new human being) without seriously adressing my arguments isn't very helpful in the discussion, I'm afraid.

Next thing you're going to state is that a foetus is a "parasite" .... you wanna bet ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Just like taking out an appendix is.
Or maybe like removing a penis during a sex change operation? Absolutely disgusting!

GRANNY.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Hopping from one thing ( ... a human organ ) to the other ( ... some germ, not the body of a new human being) without seriously adressing my arguments isn't very helpful in the discussion, I'm afraid.

Next thing you're going to state is that a foetus is a "parasite" .... you wanna bet ?
You made an argument? Guess I missed that.

If your argument was that something can't be removed from the human body because it has a different DNA code, than my example of the germs that cause bad breath is a counterexample to show the logical flaw in your "argument".

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I see my point was completely ignored, so I'll repeat it.

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_tee_pre-health-teenage-pregnancy
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_tee_pre_sha-health-teenage-pregnancy-share

Even if you are against abortion and somehow think it's right to force your ethics on other people, legalizing abortion and having good sex education appears to correlate with a low prevalence of abortions and teenage pregnancy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by generalissimo
obama is already screwing things up...

Hardly, but it's nice that you have an opinion. So very nice. 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Having abortions is not a way to avoid pregnancies. It is a way to end a pregnancy and to kill an unborn child.
without mentioning the fact that surely there are more productive things to spend money on right now.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Badwater
Hardly, but it's nice that you have an opinion. So very nice. 🙂
well, may be I exaggerated, but you have to admit that its not a good start
😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
You made an argument? Guess I missed that.

If your argument was that something can't be removed from the human body because it has a different DNA code, than my example of the germs that cause bad breath is a counterexample to show the logical flaw in your "argument".
Oh please, your deliberate misinterpretations are tiring.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by generalissimo
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123272364299610287.html

President Barack Obama quietly overturned the "global gag rule" Friday, allowing U.S. foreign-aid dollars to flow again to international family-planning programs that offer abortion or advocate for abortion rights.
The way I see it, the main difference between the two parties is which groups/organiziaiton/corporations get patronized with tax dollars. Its not a question of how much money wiil be spent, rather, it depends on which direction it will go. Now that the libs are in control it is the abortionists turn. After all, they depend on the money coming in from such groups for their campaigns.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Having abortions is not a way to avoid pregnancies. It is a way to end a pregnancy and to kill an unborn child.
Children, by definition, are never unborn.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Children, by definition, are never unborn.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/child

2. An unborn or young person, a minor, especially one who has not yet entered into puberty.

Vote Up
Vote Down

It's funny how in abortion discussions my screen is always flooding with irrelevant arguments based on semantics.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.