Originally posted by FMF So you can't be bothered to look into it and find the answer? So in effect, we are debating the fact that you have raised a question you can't be bothered to find the answer to because it has a blame-Obama angle? THAT's the debate??
you don't have an answer? i'm asking a question and you're answer is "why don't you answer it?" if i could answer it i wouldn't ask, would i?
why shouldn't i raise it if it has a blame-Obama angle?
Originally posted by zeeblebot you don't have an answer?
An answer to what? So far you've only demonstrated that you can't be bothered to look into it and get the explanation and THE POINT, you say, is that no one has compared Bush to Obama? Are you desparate or something?
Originally posted by FMF But as long as zeeblebot doesn't know, then Obama is to blame [for something].
You don't get it do you?
Even if zeeblebot does know, Obama must be to blame.
Rule #1. If something bad happens then it's Obama's fault.
Rule #2. If something good happens then either it's Obama's fault that it didn't happen sooner and it happened despite Obama's evil plans to prevent it from happening.
Originally posted by zeeblebot http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7726142/Barack-Obama-sends-nuclear-experts-to-tackle-BPs-Gulf-of-Mexico-oil-leak.html
The US has sent a team of nuclear physicists to help BP plug the "catastrophic" flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico from its leaking Deepwater Horizon well, as the Obama administration becomes frustrated ...[text shortened]... Secretary.
He has charged the men with finding solutions to stop the flow of oil.
...
I want to say something about nuking a hole, gosh do I want to.
Associated Press Writers Jeffrey Collins And Jason Dearen – 23 mins ago
NEW ORLEANS – BP said Monday it was siphoning some of the oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico, but worries escalated about the ooze reaching a major ocean current that could carry it through the Florida Keys and up the East Coast.