03 Jan '14 17:07>
Originally posted by no1marauderThere are many other advantages and disadvantages of forming a corporation besides the liability protection. For one, corporations have to pay taxes separate from the taxes paid on profits made by owners.
The whole point of incorporation is to create a legal entity separate and distinct from its owners. Your argument is "a have your cake and eat it too" one; I want to form a corporation so I am not personally liable for its debts but I insist that as far as my constitutional rights are concerned the corporation is a mere extension of me.
You can't have it both ways.
You've taken one advantage of being a corporation (i.e. limit to personal liability) and juxtaposed it with one proposed constraint (i.e. no personal rights) and you've asserted that you can't have one without the other. And you did all this as if it were logically on the pretext of having made a logical argument.
Boil it all down, and you've merely repeated the same assertion you've been making the whole time.
Besides, you've tried to say that the New York Times has freedom of press. If what you've just now said is a sound argument (which it is not), then by implication the New York Times does not have freedom of press.