Originally posted by SleepyguySorry ... explain to me how Zionism is not fascism. And don't give me:
And in other news, dogs are cats.
[high-pitched falsetto] "Oh, oh, they were escaping Hitler's fascists!"
because that means nothing. The French soldiers were anti-fascist during WWII, but teetered dangerously close to fascism during their struggle for Algiers.
Originally posted by scherzo... and they murder others by blowing themselves up in buses, markets and restaurants, just as they were taught to do as children by their hateful parents and Hamas TV.
There is no conclusive proof that they are terrorist. So they have a militia and they educate their children against Zionism.
Tell me scherzo, honestly. Do you think its a good thing or a bad thing when a Hamas follower martyrs her/himself and takes out a few Zionists?
Originally posted by Sleepyguy... and they murder others by blowing themselves up in buses, markets and restaurants, just as they were taught to do as children by their hateful parents and Hamas TV.
... and they murder others by blowing themselves up in buses, markets and restaurants, just as they were taught to do as children by their hateful parents and Hamas TV.
Tell me scherzo, honestly. Do you think its a good thing or a bad thing when a Hamas follower martyrs her/himself and takes out a few Zionists?
Several things.
1. The suicide bombers are neither acting in the name of Hamas, nor Islam; they are acting in the name of their country and they think that the situation is hopeless.
2. Hamas does not have a TV station.
Tell me scherzo, honestly. Do you think its a good thing or a bad thing when a Hamas follower martyrs her/himself and takes out a few Zionists?
Depends on whether it's a village in pre-1967 Israel (in which case I would disagree with the action but agree with the cause) or a Zionist settlement (in which case chances are I would support it).
Originally posted by scherzo
Several things.
1. The suicide bombers are neither acting in the name of Hamas, nor Islam; they are acting in the name of their country and they think that the situation is hopeless.
Yet Hamas is supportive of their decision (thus all the wonderfully positive kids TV shows on Al-aqsa TV), so your distinctions are irrelevant.
2. Hamas does not have a TV station.
Not anymore, thankfully. But that was not by their own choice, so again your point is irrelevant.
Depends on whether it's a village in pre-1967 Israel (in which case I would disagree with the action but agree with the cause) or a Zionist settlement (in which case chances are I would support it).
Thus you are, at the least, an apologist for, and perhaps and outright supporter of terrorism and the murder of innocents, which is not only evil, but will only continue the hopelessness and violence for the Palestinian people. This position is only logical to a mind twisted by hate and a lust for revenge.
Originally posted by SleepyguyHamas did not support the suicide bombings. The closest thing they have to a TV station is al-Jazeera, but that's centered in Qatar and is mostly a worldwide news station.
Originally posted by scherzo
[b]Several things.
1. The suicide bombers are neither acting in the name of Hamas, nor Islam; they are acting in the name of their country and they think that the situation is hopeless.
Yet Hamas is supportive of their decision (thus all the wonderfully positive kids TV shows on Al-aqsa TV), so your distinctio ...[text shortened]... tinian people. This position is only logical to a mind twisted by hate and a lust for revenge.[/b]
I do not support the "terrorism and murder of innocents." Settlers are not innocents.
