Go back
Platos dialogues

Platos dialogues

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Please will someone summurise this in a way I will understand.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Plato assassinated his teacher, Socrates, by writing down conversations the Socrates allegedly engaged in. In the conversations, Socrates routinely traps his opponents by asking them to choose between two equally plausible alternatives (one of which must be rejected on the basis of some principle). His either/or logic obscures that there is generally an unmentioned third choice that, if mentioned, would cause the entire edifice of Socrates' argument to collapse upon itself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

So its like saying eather I'm right or your wrong?

Vote Up
Vote Down

There's also a lot of stuff in there (tediously so in the Symposium) about how great fancying boys is. Think of him as William Burroughs without the guillotines and mouldy jockstraps.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Amaurote
There's also a lot of stuff in there (tediously so in the Symposium) about how great fancying boys is. Think of him as William Burroughs without the guillotines and mouldy jockstraps.
And Central American drugs.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Socrates knew he was wisest teacher because he knew that he didn't know much, where as the other teachers though that they knew a lot.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Amaurote
There's also a lot of stuff in there (tediously so in the Symposium) about how great fancying boys is. Think of him as William Burroughs without the guillotines and mouldy jockstraps.
Of course, Plato would have had Burroughs expelled from the Republic for being a poet.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Plato always took good care of his slaves.
Today's capitalists could learn from him.

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato%27s_Republic

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wulebgr
His either/or logic obscures that there is generally an unmentioned third choice that, if mentioned, would cause the entire edifice of Socrates' argument to collapse upon itself.
Yes, once you reject the law of the excluded middle everything becomes much easier.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Brother Edwin
Please will someone summurise this in a way I will understand.
If you're serious about wanting to understand a Platonic Dialogue, choose one and we can go through it together.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bbarr
If you're serious about wanting to understand a Platonic Dialogue, choose one and we can go through it together.
I've always been fond of the Symposium: lots of talk of young boys, and even some touching.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by bbarr
If you're serious about wanting to understand a Platonic Dialogue, choose one and we can go through it together.
Generous offer, I'd like to join in. I only have The Republic, something from that?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Generous offer, I'd like to join in. I only have The Republic, something from that?
Count me in. I'm vying to win recongition from Ivanhoe to be Bbarr's bitch.

Nemesio

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nemesio
Count me in. I'm vying to win recongition from Ivanhoe to be Bbarr's bitch.

Nemesio
I'd like Ivanhoe to join too. Maybe he'd get more out of it than those online logic sites. And it's free, too.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.