@kmax87 said600. I made several mistakes , just yesterday. But usually posters here pick up on obvious mistakes like this one. Next you will be going after mis-spells. I did a lot of those yesterday (in a golf cart) but everyone was cool with it. Pansies are generally not cool, and like to call the slightest miss in a debate. Like you.
I can't keep up. Is it 6 or 600 billion?
Anyway, the number is over $600B for future refeence when you write some of your scintillating prose.
@AverageJoe1 saidIf Trump picks him as his VP, no doubt you'll come back in here exclaiming how he was the best choice, blah, blah, blah.
Maruader quotes debate jabs. How about 'you have small hands'. He doesn't really, you know. I'm calling Rubio out as a liar. The Forum has a higher bar everyday!!!
Because you don't mind liars leading you around by the nose.
@AverageJoe1 saidProve it.
600. I made several mistakes , just yesterday. But usually posters here pick up on obvious mistakes like this one. Next you will be going after mis-spells. I did a lot of those yesterday (in a golf cart) but everyone was cool with it. Pansies are generally not cool, and like to call the slightest miss in a debate. Like you.
Anyway, the number is over $600B for future refeence when you write some of your scintillating prose.
@Suzianne saidNo, I rather let go rather than be dragged, as my granny once said. Libs are all cinched up pretty tight, safety in numbers, and easier to get other peoples' stuff.
If Trump picks him as his VP, no doubt you'll come back in here exclaiming how he was the best choice, blah, blah, blah.
Because you don't mind liars leading you around by the nose.
I will agree with ANY VP pick of Trump, of course. Can you imagine someone like Sonhouse or other people with deep-set knowledge telling a candidate who to ;pick!!! They would pick a guy who likes to punish successful people, or wants to casually dictate the expenditure of money in our treasury for things that are not emergencies
2 edits
@kmax87 saidI see the quote cited as more of a McCain diss than POWs, but that would go nowhere.
Did you never keep up with the news as it happened? Or is this your basic strategy.
Deny everything and then ask for proof? Hows that working out for you hey?
However I was checking it wasn't the repetition of yet another biden brain short circuit:
Sleepy said:
“I went to the World War II cemetery (befuddled) — World War I cemetery he refused to go to. He was standing with his four-star general, and he told me he said, ‘I don’t want to go in there because they’re a bunch of losers and suckers.’”
Which is, of course, a lie.
Asking someone for a clarification is not 'denying everything' it is known as a 'query'. Do I need to copy/paste a definition for you?
Edit: Looking back through the thread it is a relevant query because it seems TDS sufferer shathouse is hinting at it.
What seems to be happening with this project 2025, is that the extremist have shifted the discussion away from it by having everyone focus on whether trump knows about it or not.
The first issue should be: what do you think of it?
- do you agree with more powers being handed to an individual ruler?
- do you agree with less objective civil servants, and more appointed yes-nodders?
You have to comprehend what it is first.
Then look to see who’s pushing this agenda.
And then decide if a certain candidate is more or less likely to pass it.