Purpose, reasoning, for Transgender bathrooms??

@moonbus said
The USA is even at the best of times lukewarm on the UN. It refuses to join the ICC. If Trump gets his way, either in the WH or through proxies in Congress, the USA might cancel membership in NATO, the WHO, and a raft of other international institutions.

The USA is also very much an outlier on issues such as functional national health care system. Europe has them up and running for better than 50 years now.

I would love to compare your health care to mine. You would sheepishly slither away...or, try to join mine.

@shavixmir said
When the hell were you shooting pheasant in the UK? You went to England to hunt some game??

Hardly bloody likely.

One doesn't 'hunt' pheasant, we just shoot them.

@averagejoe1 said
One doesn't 'hunt' pheasant, we just shoot them.

If your shooting is anywhere near as astute as your wit, the pheasants got nothing to worry about.

When were you hunting them?

@shavixmir said
If your shooting is anywhere near as astute as your wit, the pheasants got nothing to worry about.

When were you hunting them?

oct 23-28th. area west coker

@averagejoe1 said
We want laws???? We already have laws, you silly person. So you must mean more laws. Is that why y'all carry signs around? To get new laws? Let's have a thread on bad laws, the ones our parents were 'forced' to live under. What a rough life. Let's change them get government involved. You know,,,,,,the government...that entity you tnink about every 5 minutes. Hey, ...[text shortened]... wish I had an employee that I spot carrying a sign in a parade, I would fire that employee by text.

Firing people for what they legally do on their own time is a good way to got yourself sued

@athousandyoung said
Firing people for what they legally do on their own time is a good way to got yourself sued

That is correct, very smart. I would be smarter, though, in the way that I am firing them. But, I would sure get rid of them.
On their own time? Do you think all those losers with signs are 'on their own time'? Haha. Of course, the ones you know that don't work, and you have plenty that you know, are on their own time and govt money. Really, in my workin days, I could not leave my office. How do y'all do that? I had deals to close. Thank God I did that though, I guess I am prepared for what comes. What is 'coming' for you are swarms of aliens, they will have your kids' jobs, everyone will make less money.
My kids have nothing to worry about. Hope you all can say the same. Whew.

@athousandyoung said
Firing people for what they legally do on their own time is a good way to got yourself sued

Something I've never been able to understand and this goes way back personally pre-libertarian.

Why do you want to continue to work for someone that does not want you there for any reason? The employee/employer relationship is one of mutual exploitation and mutual benefit. By continuing to provide a service to an employer you disagree with you are in effect helping to support that person, and vice versa. If the relationship is so toxic that one or the other has to go, then go.

Plenty of employees decide not to work for a Co./employer because of the Co./employers out of hours conduct/politics.

@wajoma said
Something I've never been able to understand and this goes way back personally pre-libertarian.

Why do you want to continue to work for someone that does not want you there for any reason? The employee/employer relationship is one of mutual exploitation and mutual benefit. By continuing to provide a service to an employer you disagree with you are in effect helping to s ...[text shortened]... es decide not to work for a Co./employer because of the Co./employers out of hours conduct/politics.

Money.

@wildgrass said
Money.

We are all fully aware that the employer/employee relationship is about money, the employee makes money directly from selling their services, the employer makes money by indirectly on-selling those services. i.e. a mutually exploitative, mutually beneficial relationship

This does not make any difference to the point I made.

wildgrass tries to appear wittily obscure by a one word reply but ends up presenting his/her/itself as an actual lack-wit.

@wajoma said
Something I've never been able to understand and this goes way back personally pre-libertarian.

Why do you want to continue to work for someone that does not want you there for any reason? The employee/employer relationship is one of mutual exploitation and mutual benefit. By continuing to provide a service to an employer you disagree with you are in effect helping to s ...[text shortened]... es decide not to work for a Co./employer because of the Co./employers out of hours conduct/politics.

Coulda written this myself.....it is common sense. Kinda like if your job does not pay enough, you quit and find another job. Liberals spread blame around and sue. Note that suing was just mentioned by one of our resident dependents above 1000young. If I hire a guy and find out he has a tattoo protruding over his collar, I would fire him for cause, on the spot. He should have disclosed that to me when hired. Appearance is tantamount in business.
A lib certainly has a diff definition of appearance, but hey, it is my business, I own it, I don't split profits, and, I define appearance. It all seems so easy.

@averagejoe1 said
oct 23-28th. area west coker

God damn… how the hell did you end up down there??

But, okay, ai believe you.
I personally love pheasant. And wood pigeon. And venison.

@wajoma said
We are all fully aware that the employer/employee relationship is about money, the employee makes money directly from selling their services, the employer makes money by indirectly on-selling those services. i.e. a mutually exploitative, mutually beneficial relationship

This does not make any difference to the point I made.

wildgrass tries to appear wittily obscure by a one word reply but ends up presenting his/her/itself as an actual lack-wit.

Did you mis-phrase the question then?

@wajoma said
Something I've never been able to understand and this goes way back personally pre-libertarian.

Why do you want to continue to work for someone that does not want you there for any reason? The employee/employer relationship is one of mutual exploitation and mutual benefit. By continuing to provide a service to an employer you disagree with you are in effect helping to s ...[text shortened]... es decide not to work for a Co./employer because of the Co./employers out of hours conduct/politics.

Because employers coordinate with other employers causing a cartel locking people out of jobs across the board. Shirley you've heard of black lists.

@averagejoe1 said
Coulda written this myself.....it is common sense. Kinda like if your job does not pay enough, you quit and find another job. Liberals spread blame around and sue. Note that suing was just mentioned by one of our resident dependents above 1000young. If I hire a guy and find out he has a tattoo protruding over his collar, I would fire him for cause, on the spot. He shou ...[text shortened]... it is my business, I own it, I don't split profits, and, I define appearance. It all seems so easy.

Especially the handouts you get from your red state.

@athousandyoung said
Because employers coordinate with other employers causing a cartel locking people out of jobs across the board. Shirley you've heard of black lists.

Yes, they're called unions.