1 edit
@sonhouse saidHas nothing to do with what side people pick when it gets bad.
@Contenchess
My grandpa lived to 104, mom to 100, aunt to 96 so I picked the right parents.....
BTW, 90 year olds are going to space these days.
With your rage...I'm surprised your ticker hasn't exploded 🤔
- Joined
- 28 Feb 16
- Moves
- 5090
Back to the original question of "what did we learn from this election..."
I think we learned that there really is a major shipping problem. All those Chinese-made ballots must have failed to get into Virginia, therefore the Republicans made some nice gains.
(We'll also learn, in short order, that the snowflake libs here can't take a joke and will lambast anyone who dares speak in any negative way of their deities in the DNC.)
@sonhouse
"there is ZERO actual provable evidence"
I assume you keep in mind evidence about election fraud.
Your claim that there is ZERO evidence of election fraud during the US elections in 2020 is so blatantly false that it makes discussion with you impossible.
Such demagoguery about zero evidence is based on ignorance concerning the laws regulating elections. An important nuance is that the courts will not start to manage the accusation if, when true, the correction of the results would not amount to changing the winner. Therefore, if some court rejected the complaint without starting to process it, it in no way means that there were no facts.
Actually, in ALL elections some frauds appear here and there. It has always been so. Therefore, always the real question is about the number of misconducts, etc.
It seems that you have not read the newspapers of your own country.
Nevertheless, your reply to mine was absolutely beside the point because you changed the context and theme. I was talking about censorship. You cannot learn if there is too much censorship. And, for example, Facebook banned even highly informed expert papers about the pluses and minuses of the voting machines, about their possible weak points. Therefore, you probably simply do not know whether your VOTING MACHINE is trustworthy at all, whether it can be hacked or manipulated, whether it can be detected, and so on.
Thus, you ignored what I said and changed the theme. On your new theme, however, you presented an incompetent and blatantly false claim that the number of fraud cases in these elections was absolute ZERO.
2 edits
@averagejoe1 saidNo you clown the republicants here are judging Biden in direct comparison to Trump, and it is Trump ( most likely ) who will be the POTUS candidate for the republicants in 2024, so no, talking about trump has nothing to do with the past, it is the crux of the political here and now.
You are the winner of missing issues, missing points. MY point is that you are simply saying in earlier post that 'that was a long time ago', not worth talking about. OK, I agree. But you seem to want to talk about Trump, who is not relevant to today's issues, either. He USED to be president. But you TALK about that old issue, the Trump issue. But we shouldn't talk about the Dem issue of yesteryear.
But you cannot be thick enough not to realise this so you must just be lying again.
Don’t you ever tire of lying Joe?
@eintaluj saidThat’s right there is a conspiracy afoot by MSM, Social Media and of course the Lizard people to keep right wing cranks out of the White House. Now if only we could get them off the forums 🤔
@sonhouse
"there is ZERO actual provable evidence"
I assume you keep in mind evidence about election fraud.
Your claim that there is ZERO evidence of election fraud during the US elections in 2020 is so blatantly false that it makes discussion with you impossible.
Such demagoguery about zero evidence is based on ignorance concerning the laws regulating election ...[text shortened]... etent and blatantly false claim that the number of fraud cases in these elections was absolute ZERO.
@kevcvs57 saidYou say I am judging Biden in comparison to Trump, when my post clearly says to quit talking about Trump. Are you daft?
No you clown the republicants here are judging Biden in direct comparison to Trump, and it is Trump ( most likely ) who will be the POTUS candidate for the republicants in 2024, so no, talking about trump has nothing to do with the past, it is the crux of the political here and now.
But you cannot be thick enough not to realise this so you must just be lying again.
Don’t you ever tire of lying Joe?
Since you say that, are you, in effect, lying.? I am not comparing the 2. You say I am. You lie. I am going to tell everyone at recess that you are a liar, you are a liar!!!
(In adult terms, you are a lost cause when it comes to debating)
@averagejoe1 saidWell you must be the stupidest person I’ve ever met. I’ve just explained why you cannot critique Biden as POTUS without reference to Trump given that he was the previous POTUS and will likely be his replacement if the electorate are dumb enough to give the Trump dictatorship project another shot.
You say I am judging Biden in comparison to Trump, when my post clearly says to quit talking about Trump. Are you daft?
Since you say that, are you, in effect, lying.? I am not comparing the 2. You say I am. You lie. I am going to tell everyone at recess that you are a liar, you are a liar!!!
(In adult terms, you are a lost cause when it comes to debating)
@mott-the-hoople saidNone Dummy that’s why I’m not retarded enough to send money to his Cayman Island bank account like his dumb as ditchwater base.
how much rent does Trump owe you?
Do you think we don’t who’s still hanging on his and his acolyte Tuckers every false word.
@kevcvs57 saidDid we critique each past president to the presidents before them? Can’t recall. The fixation of you libs is really creepy.
Well you must be the stupidest person I’ve ever met. I’ve just explained why you cannot critique Biden as POTUS without reference to Trump given that he was the previous POTUS and will likely be his replacement if the electorate are dumb enough to give the Trump dictatorship project another shot.
I think Trump would be perfect, you do not. So those statements cancel out each other. So that leaves rush to say That Trump could be his replacement, which is an obvious possibility. Geez.
So what ARE you saying? That we should compare trump and Biden? I think there is no room to do that when we have so much room to write about the nightmare that we are going through with Biden. It is difficult to write about Trump when Biden is giving us all the news we can handle.
I’m going to start a thread in about an hour that might enlighten you. Geez. What news r yoi fellers glommed onto? Suzianne’s Smatterings?
@kevcvs57 saidThere IS evidence about the violations during the US 2020 elections. First, the numbers badly do not sum up correctly.
That’s right there is a conspiracy afoot by MSM, Social Media and of course the Lizard people to keep right wing cranks out of the White House. Now if only we could get them off the forums 🤔
The evidence was presented to the courts. When courts rejected the case, it was not because there was zero evidence, but because the courts decided that this evidence does not amount to disputing the results of the elections. After the results of the elections have been confirmed, however, again one can go to the court with this evidence. But then, one cannot change the result of the elections anymore. Moreover, there were some cases when the evidence was strong and the election results were subsequently changed.
It is wrong to say that the complaints had zero evidence and were completely baseless. The real question is whether the violations were so extensive as to change the real winner. However, I am not going to discuss THAT question.
What I argued was solely, that you cannot learn anything from your elections if the mainstream media and main social media platforms have censored the information about the violations, the arguments of those who complain, etc. And it rather seems that some disputants here are using their ignorance as an argument.
The lesson to be learnt is that there can be no real democracy without objective information, freedom of speech and -information.
Thank you.
@eintaluj saidYou are exactly right, but Utopia aint happening. A nice post, but no legs to get to anything other than biased press. It is more difficult for the liberal press, because they want to change everything. Conservatives want to simply be left (the hell) alone and report the news. Someone on this forum said that Tucker lies, and I will be the first to admit it if someone tells me the lie. But that someone will not tell me of a lie. So does Tucker lie, or not.?
There IS evidence about the violations during the US 2020 elections. First, the numbers badly do not sum up correctly.
The evidence was presented to the courts. When courts rejected the case, it was not because there was zero evidence, but because the courts decided that this evidence does not amount to disputing the results of the elections. After the results of the ele ...[text shortened]... e no real democracy without objective information, freedom of speech and -information.
Thank you.
@kevcvs57 saidWhat, of Tucker’s words, do you find uncomfortable? Feel free to confer with Suzianne.
None Dummy that’s why I’m not retarded enough to send money to his Cayman Island bank account like his dumb as ditchwater base.
Do you think we don’t who’s still hanging on his and his acolyte Tuckers every false word.
@eintaluj saidYes so despite your politically slanted view of the evidence presented In by support of the Big Lie not even you have the gall to pretend that whatever evidence there was did not even remotely put the tiniest dent in Biden’s circa 8 million vote victory, in fact no different to any other POTUS election and probably less than some.
There IS evidence about the violations during the US 2020 elections. First, the numbers badly do not sum up correctly.
The evidence was presented to the courts. When courts rejected the case, it was not because there was zero evidence, but because the courts decided that this evidence does not amount to disputing the results of the elections. After the results of the ele ...[text shortened]... e no real democracy without objective information, freedom of speech and -information.
Thank you.