Go back
return conscientious objector to USA?

return conscientious objector to USA?

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7444116.stm

"I joined the Army National Guard in 1992. We all knew and it was made perfectly clear many times, before and after we joined, that we were in the United States Military and were required to defend the nation at home and abroad. We were never once told, nor was it inferred, that all we would do is "fill sandbags" for humanitarian reasons. Corey Glass joined the "ARMY National Guard" not the Peace Corps, Salvation Army, or any other humanitarian organization. The difference is that the Military pays more money. That is why Corey Glass joined. You train with guns, grenades, claymores; you train to fight a war. Not once in basic training was Corey Glass trained, nor was it ever mentioned in any class, or any Army field manual how to fill sandbags to stop a flood. Corey Glass learned to fill sandbags for a bunker to defend a military forward operating base from enemy attack. If it is for moral reasons then do what other conscientious objectors with standards have done: serve your time in a military prison for going back on the oath you gave to your country and fellow military personnel. Chris
CK, LIC, NY"

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7444116.stm

"I joined the Army National Guard in 1992. We all knew and it was made perfectly clear many times, before and after we joined, that we were in the United States Military and were required to defend the nation at home and abroad. We were never once told, nor was it inferred, that all we would do is "fill sa k on the oath you gave to your country and fellow military personnel. Chris
CK, LIC, NY"
Sounds like he's got things in perspective:
"I believe the Iraq War is illegal and morally wrong. I believe I have a duty to refuse to take part in a war not sanctioned by the United Nations, started on the basis of lies."

They should probably prosecute those who perpetrated a fraud on the American people (and the world) in starting an unjust war instead.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Sounds like he's got things in perspective:
"I believe the Iraq War is illegal and morally wrong. I believe I have a duty to refuse to take part in a war not sanctioned by the United Nations, started on the basis of lies."
Good for him! 🙂

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Why didn't he join the UN military then? I don't like my tax dollars going to employ someone who's unwilling to do his job because some other people across the planet who don't pay his wages don't want him to do it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Why didn't he join the UN military then? I don't like my tax dollars going to employ someone who's unwilling to do his job because some other people across the planet who don't pay his wages don't want him to do it.
Maybe the UN doesn't pay as well?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
Maybe the UN doesn't pay as well?
This is a man of principle and morals and stuff, remember?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Why didn't he join the UN military then?
Not a bad idea, but your precious tax dollars would still be paying for him, I think.

Did you ever get round to seeing a recruitment officer?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Not a bad idea, but your precious tax dollars would still be paying for him, I think.

Did you ever get round to seeing a recruitment officer?
No time. My school needs me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The concept that someone who joins the army can't leave when he wants to is quite possibly insane.

Why on earth can't someone change their minds and think: "Hell... actually, now I've read Bertrand Russell, I don't really want to go out and kill anybody anymore." (for example).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
The concept that someone who joins the army can't leave when he wants to is quite possibly insane.

Why on earth can't someone change their minds and think: "Hell... actually, now I've read Bertrand Russell, I don't really want to go out and kill anybody anymore." (for example).
Or, indeed, "I can see how war is sometimes necessary in self-defence but I question whether this particular war fits the bill. In particular, the fact that the country I'm being told to invade has lots of oil, and there isn't any good reason I can see for invading it, leads me to be suspicious of my government's motives".

I have friends who had cruisy civilian jobs prior to 9/11 who joined or rejoined the US military out of a sense of duty after 9/11. I don't think it's fair for someone who signed up thinking they were being sent to Afghanistan to then have no choice about being sent to Iraq, because there's a huge discrepancy between the merits of those two wars. Soldiers should have the right to make a decision of conscience about whether to endorse a particular war by fighting in it. No-one should be forced to kill people without being allowed a decision of conscience over whether the war is justified. (Compulsion is no defence for murder in a civilian context, incidentally.)

At the end of the day, in a country with 300 million people, if there's a clear and imminent threat to the country then there won't be a shortage of brave men and women willing to fight to defend it. No-one needs to be forced to stay in the military -- and this includes McCain's manipulative bill to try and trap people in the military by not giving them good benefits if they leave too early. You only need to force soldiers to go to war if your war isn't justified or necesary.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by karnachz
You only need to force soldiers to go to war if your war isn't justified or necesary.

Or maybe if they're like my brother who joined because it was peacetime and he didn't believe war might break out. He's very anti-war now.

If you sign up, you need to fulfill your contract.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung

If you sign up, you need to fulfill your contract.
How insane would a war have to be for you to change your mind? Say the president decides to end that immigration problem once and for all and sends the troops into Mexico 'for regional security' -- would you still regard conscientious objection (especially by troops with Mexican heritage) as a contractual matter in that case?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
How insane would a war have to be for you to change your mind? Say the president decides to end that immigration problem once and for all and sends the troops into Mexico 'for regional security' -- would you still regard conscientious objection (especially by troops with Mexican heritage) as a contractual matter in that case?
A good question.

Unfortunately, when you join the army, you have to accept that you must simply obey orders without question.
Even if that means shooting your friend tied to a post for desertion.

War may be stupid, but anyone who joins the army must be even more stupid.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
How insane would a war have to be for you to change your mind? Say the president decides to end that immigration problem once and for all and sends the troops into Mexico 'for regional security' -- would you still regard conscientious objection (especially by troops with Mexican heritage) as a contractual matter in that case?
You realize you're talking to a Chicano with a venemous hatred of the Los Angeles gangs, right?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
You realize you're talking to a Chicano with a venemous hatred of the Los Angeles gangs, right?
Yes ... Would that be an incentive for you to join up?

I wonder about the feasibility of short-term military contracts.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.