@metal-brain saidThe delightful soul was also a convicted child molester, for what that's worth.
Rosenbaum was being a violent maniac.
Is it true Rosenbaum was mentally ill and recently released from a mental hospital?
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-joseph-rosenbaum-025246842.html
@sh76 saidYou know what it is worth. Not even convicted child molesters can be killed by shooting them in the back.
The delightful soul was also a convicted child molester, for what that's worth.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-joseph-rosenbaum-025246842.html
@no1marauder said"Not even convicted child molesters can be killed by shooting them in the back."
You know what it is worth. Not even convicted child molesters can be killed by shooting them in the back.
wrong there buddy!
@mott-the-hoople saidI should have added "legally".
"Not even convicted child molesters can be killed by shooting them in the back."
wrong there buddy!
@no1marauder saiddepends on the actions of the molester. you find yourself defending some pretty fuked up people dont you?
I should have added "legally".
@mott-the-hoople saidLike the people defending an accused killer in this thread?
depends on the actions of the molester. you find yourself defending some pretty fuked up people dont you?
@no1marauder saidare you against all our soldiers? sometimes killing is necessary.
Like the people defending an accused killer in this thread?
now, give me your excuse for raping children
@mott-the-hoople saidOnly in the diseased minds of right wingers have I ever defended "raping children."
are you against all our soldiers? sometimes killing is necessary.
now, give me your excuse for raping children
@no1marauder said"In most jurisdictions today, the circumstantial use of character is rejected but with important exceptions: ...
You know what it is worth. Not even convicted child molesters can be killed by shooting them in the back.
(2) an accused may introduce pertinent evidence of the character of the victim, as in support of a claim of self-defense to a charge of homicide"
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_404
I would say being chomo is indicative of a person who's more likely to use aggression against another person.
1 edit
@sh76 saidI doubt even Judge Schroeder would agree to such a baseless claim. Given the extremely prejudicial nature of such information, it would be akin to declaring open season on such individuals.
"In most jurisdictions today, the circumstantial use of character is rejected but with important exceptions: ...
(2) an accused may introduce pertinent evidence of the character of the victim, as in support of a claim of self-defense to a charge of homicide"
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_404
I would say being chomo is indicative of a person who's more likely to use aggression against another person.
@no1marauder saidWhat would you consider "pertinent evidence of the character of the victim, as in support of a claim of self-defense to a charge of homicide"?
I doubt even Judge Schroeder would agree to such a baseless claim.
@sh76 saidI'm sure no recent case ever considered child sexual abuse as such.
What would you consider "pertinent evidence of the character of the victim, as in support of a claim of self-defense to a charge of homicide"?
@sh76 saidDont look for original thought here. Prepare for links
What would you consider "pertinent evidence of the character of the victim, as in support of a claim of self-defense to a charge of homicide"?