@Earl-of-Trumps saidMaybe if she were convicted of a felony she would be president by now?
yes. from her illegal hidden mail server
@Earl-of-Trumps saidIn other words you don't care how many convictions Trump has you are still a Magat. NO matter how many businesses he ran into the ground or bankruptcies or maybe named in the Epstein files, he is a bastard but he is YOUR bastard.
you should write commentary for some liberal rag
@Earl-of-Trumps saidSo the ONLY thing that would cause you to reject your Lord Trump is if he is in the Epstein files?
of cose
34 felony counts don't do it. Corrupt Jury, Corrupt Judge, Corrupt lawyers.
It doesn't matter to you if YOU had had 10 contempt charges we would be in jail but Trump gets a bye. 1000 per contempt, chicken change.
Threatening the judge, AND his family. And legal clerk and stenographer.
No big deal
Stealing hundreds of top secret docs and reading one of them to an Aussie billionaire. What's the problem.
They are locked up.
Well we ALL feel SO much better knowing that
He could literally shoot someone in Times square on New Years and you would just say the victim deserved it.
@Earl-of-Trumps saidI'll take that as a yes. You don't care how morally corrupt or physically corrupt Trump is, you Love the fact you will have your tax refund of a half million soon
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
@Earl-of-Trumps saidIllegal, hidden email server?
yes. from her illegal hidden mail server
You mean like Colin Powell's "illegal, hidden" server?
Or like Condoleezza Rice's "illegal, hidden" server?
Fun Fact: These ex-Secretaries of State kept email servers at their home, just like Ms. Clinton.
@boonon saidGiven the Republican Party's response to other true things, like Russia's involvement in the 2016 election?
@KingDavid403
The Dems would have used that list before the election if the Donald was a kid toucher.
Get serious.
@wildgrass saidI did not move any goal posts.
Stop moving goalposts.
Do you just think lying is trendy?
@Metal-Brain saidRussia interfered in our election. Trump's campaign manager and other members of the campaign including his son participated in that interference. When he was asked by the FBI, he chose prison instead of answering simple questions.
I did not move any goal posts.
Do you just think lying is trendy?
These are facts. Collusion is secret by definition and cannot be proven true unless people admit to it. So you move the goalpost to collusion, without acknowledging that real crimes happened and the Russia investigation was not a hoax.
@Earl-of-Trumps saidOh yeah, just one party after another in this heaven we call life under Trump.
@sonhouse
enjoying yourself?
@wildgrass saidBrennan and others admitted they had no evidence when they started the investigation. Manafort did not collude with Russia. His crimes were unrelated to Russia as you have been told countless times.
Russia interfered in our election. Trump's campaign manager and other members of the campaign including his son participated in that interference. When he was asked by the FBI, he chose prison instead of answering simple questions.
These are facts. Collusion is secret by definition and cannot be proven true unless people admit to it. So you move the goalpost to collusion, without acknowledging that real crimes happened and the Russia investigation was not a hoax.
You have conflated campaign opposition research with election interference. There is nothing illegal about opposition research. Hillary did that when she had Steele create the dossier that is a pack of lies. You had no problem with that.
@wildgrass
From the link below:
"And now we have the Durham annex... which includes a 2016 memorandum alleging that Russian intelligence knew of a Clinton campaign plan to tie Trump to Russian hackers. This memo claims the plan was designed to “distract the [American] public from the Clinton email server scandal.” Gabbard’s HPSCI report similarly references Russian intelligence claiming Clinton’s campaign discussed linking Putin to Trump.
Clinton’s Approval of Smear Campaign: Pages 4 and 5 of the annex, highlighted in X posts, contain a 2016 memorandum alleging that Clinton personally approved a plan on July 26, 2016, to frame Trump with Russian hacking claims. The memo suggests this was to distract from her email scandal, with coordination involving DNC leadership and outside groups."
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/smoking-gun-declassified-durham-appendix-confirms-hillary-clinton-plan-smear-trump-use
2 edits
@Metal-Brain saidThere was enough smoke and valid reasons for FBI/cia to look into it. Of course mistakes were made and that is all documented in the three fracking prior reports we all had to read. Durham report, Senate report, house report etc etc all of them basically said the same thing except the partisan Republicans wanted it on the record that they didn't think Putin thought trump would win.
Brennan and others admitted they had no evidence when they started the investigation. Manafort did not collude with Russia. His crimes were unrelated to Russia as you have been told countless times.
You have conflated campaign opposition research with election interference. There is nothing illegal about opposition research. Hillary did that when she had Steele create the dossier that is a pack of lies. You had no problem with that.
Some of the intle was bad and the agents were overzealous. Some reports weren't filed correctly.
Why did Papadopoulos and stone and others lie to the FBI if it was just opposition research?
Manafort was the campaign manager in an active and very high profile presidential campaign. They have interns for oppo research, he should not have time for that. He's taking Trump's two sons to a meeting with a Russian spy in NYC for oppo research? Nah, in politics this is done at a shady hotel with a campaign lawyer who knows not to lie if the FBI comes around asking questions.
Roger stone, Michael Flynn, the list goes on. These guys were acting guilty. It made sense for the FBI to investigate and then when they did everyone lied about it. Why would they do that if it was just to sif up dirt on Clinton?
@Metal-Brain saidOk, but all of that was reviewed by Durham, was used to make the determination of no wrongdoing for the third time. I've been asking the forum what's the new evidence that makes this a treasonous conspiracy and no one has provided that.
@wildgrass
From the link below:
"And now we have the Durham annex... which includes a 2016 memorandum alleging that Russian intelligence knew of a Clinton campaign plan to tie Trump to Russian hackers. This memo claims the plan was designed to “distract the [American] public from the Clinton email server scandal.” Gabbard’s HPSCI report similarly references Russian in ...[text shortened]... com/political/smoking-gun-declassified-durham-appendix-confirms-hillary-clinton-plan-smear-trump-use