19 Jan '11 20:54>
http://www.cnn.com/2011/TRAVEL/01/19/ryanair.boarding.fee.judge/
So, under the guise of "protecting" the consumer, this moronic judge is trying to force an airline essentially to raise rates or cut other services (the money doesn't grow on trees, folks; Ryanair has to make their money somehow) because it doesn't like what essentially amounts to a stupid/lazy tax.
The rule, fully disclosed by private company as a condition of their service, rewards people for having the sense and foresight to simply print their boarding passes at home. If you're too technologically inept to print your boarding pass or too lazy or forgetful (or have enough money so that you don't care), you pay a tax so that everyone can have lower fares in general.
What is "abusive" about that?
The activist judges and public advocates and the like want to have their cake and eat it too. They want the low fares, but they don't want companies to have the freedom to do what's necessary to keep those fares low. It's pathetic.
I sincerely hope they do this; just to show that judge how moronic it is to start dictating price rules to competitive private sector companies in a vacuum.
A judge in Barcelona, Spain, ruled that the carrier's 40 euro (about $54) boarding card reissue fee is illegal. Passengers must pay it if they arrive for their flight without a pre-printed boarding pass.
"I declare abusive and, therefore, null, the clause in the contract by which Ryanair obliges the passenger to take a boarding pass to the airport," Judge Barbara Cordoba said, according to The Guardian.
So, under the guise of "protecting" the consumer, this moronic judge is trying to force an airline essentially to raise rates or cut other services (the money doesn't grow on trees, folks; Ryanair has to make their money somehow) because it doesn't like what essentially amounts to a stupid/lazy tax.
The rule, fully disclosed by private company as a condition of their service, rewards people for having the sense and foresight to simply print their boarding passes at home. If you're too technologically inept to print your boarding pass or too lazy or forgetful (or have enough money so that you don't care), you pay a tax so that everyone can have lower fares in general.
What is "abusive" about that?
The activist judges and public advocates and the like want to have their cake and eat it too. They want the low fares, but they don't want companies to have the freedom to do what's necessary to keep those fares low. It's pathetic.
If the decision is not reversed, Ryanair vowed to get rid of the charge altogether, warning that passengers who arrived at the airport without their pre-printed boarding passes would simply not be able to go through security or board their plane.
I sincerely hope they do this; just to show that judge how moronic it is to start dictating price rules to competitive private sector companies in a vacuum.