@mott-the-hoople saidNah, he should get some friends, march on the White House and see if he can lure Biden into a room and if he can he can expertly whip around and shoot him, claiming self defense. It worked once already, why not try his luck again?
…sue biden for defamation of character?
@mott-the-hoople saidJust because a jury declared him not-guilty of murder, doesn’t mean he should have been there, nor that he should be carrying a gun nor that he didn’t murder two people.
…sue biden for defamation of character?
I wouldn’t be surprised if the little brat got lynched at some point in the foreseeable future.
20 Nov 21
@shavixmir saidThe point is, Biden used Rittenhouse in his presidential campaign as a token of white supremacy. Like the Covington kids, i think he has a strong case. The defense gave up Kyle's phone records willingly when the prosecution couldn't crack his phone. If there was any hint of Proud boy in him, it would've made it to the court room. In short, boy gonna get paid.
Just because a jury declared him not-guilty of murder, doesn’t mean he should have been there, nor that he should be carrying a gun nor that he didn’t murder two people.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the little brat got lynched at some point in the foreseeable future.
@huckleberryhound saidMaybe he won't sue because maybe they don't want to stick their necks out just in case "evidence" could exist, they're just not sure who's holding on to it.
The point is, Biden used Rittenhouse in his presidential campaign as a token of white supremacy. Like the Covington kids, i think he has a strong case. The defense gave up Kyle's phone records willingly when the prosecution couldn't crack his phone. If there was any hint of Proud boy in him, it would've made it to the court room. In short, boy gonna get paid.
@kmax87 saidBy "Evidence" do you mean the two witnesses that attacked Kyle, that the prosecution didn't call? One of whome (Drop kick man, Maurice Freedman) had his identity with held from the Defene? Or do you mean the doctored footage? Or the footage that was given to the defence at a lower resolution? Or maybe you mean the phone records of one of the assailants that the prosecution had a warrant for, but refused to use?
Maybe he won't sue because maybe they don't want to stick their necks out just in case "evidence" could exist, they're just not sure who's holding on to it.
Or do you mean the unicorn pixie dust evidence that you guys always hold on to when you find out the main stream media lied to you again?
They lied to you about the covington kids
They lied to you about Russiagate.
They lied to you about Jessie Smullet.
They lied to you about Hunter Biden.
At some point you really have to put the Kool Aid cup down, and ask yourself why you're so god damn gullible.
@mott-the-hoople saidWhat character ??
…sue biden for defamation of character?
I had never heard of the guy before this mess.
There's nothing to defame.
- Joined
- 28 Feb 16
- Moves
- 4818
@shavixmir saidI wouldn't either, given the way the left feels about the United States Constitution.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the little brat got lynched at some point in the foreseeable future.
@mghrn55 saidClaiming he was a white supremacist, calling him a murderer, saying he was out looking for people to kill, etc. is defamation of character.
What character ??
I had never heard of the guy before this mess.
There's nothing to defame.
You don't have to be a celebrity to have your character defamed.
20 Nov 21
@huckleberryhound saiddamn…very well said👍
By "Evidence" do you mean the two witnesses that attacked Kyle, that the prosecution didn't call? One of whome (Drop kick man, Maurice Freedman) had his identity with held from the Defene? Or do you mean the doctored footage? Or the footage that was given to the defence at a lower resolution? Or maybe you mean the phone records of one of the assailants that the prose ...[text shortened]... oint you really have to put the Kool Aid cup down, and ask yourself why you're so god damn gullible.
20 Nov 21
@shavixmir saidah comrade…settle down
Just because a jury declared him not-guilty of murder, doesn’t mean he should have been there, nor that he should be carrying a gun nor that he didn’t murder two people.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the little brat got lynched at some point in the foreseeable future.
20 Nov 21
@shavixmir saidShould the other guys have been there? Just trying to level your playing field, Shav.
Just because a jury declared him not-guilty of murder, doesn’t mean he should have been there, nor that he should be carrying a gun nor that he didn’t murder two people.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the little brat got lynched at some point in the foreseeable future.
20 Nov 21
@huckleberryhound saidHeh hunter biden came up. Again.
By "Evidence" do you mean the two witnesses that attacked Kyle, that the prosecution didn't call? One of whome (Drop kick man, Maurice Freedman) had his identity with held from the Defene? Or do you mean the doctored footage? Or the footage that was given to the defence at a lower resolution? Or maybe you mean the phone records of one of the assailants that the prose ...[text shortened]... oint you really have to put the Kool Aid cup down, and ask yourself why you're so god damn gullible.