Go back
Should Rittenhouse…

Should Rittenhouse…

Debates


…sue biden for defamation of character?


@mott-the-hoople said
…sue biden for defamation of character?
Nah, he should get some friends, march on the White House and see if he can lure Biden into a room and if he can he can expertly whip around and shoot him, claiming self defense. It worked once already, why not try his luck again?


@mott-the-hoople said
…sue biden for defamation of character?
Just because a jury declared him not-guilty of murder, doesn’t mean he should have been there, nor that he should be carrying a gun nor that he didn’t murder two people.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the little brat got lynched at some point in the foreseeable future.


@shavixmir said
Just because a jury declared him not-guilty of murder, doesn’t mean he should have been there, nor that he should be carrying a gun nor that he didn’t murder two people.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the little brat got lynched at some point in the foreseeable future.
The point is, Biden used Rittenhouse in his presidential campaign as a token of white supremacy. Like the Covington kids, i think he has a strong case. The defense gave up Kyle's phone records willingly when the prosecution couldn't crack his phone. If there was any hint of Proud boy in him, it would've made it to the court room. In short, boy gonna get paid.


@huckleberryhound said
The point is, Biden used Rittenhouse in his presidential campaign as a token of white supremacy. Like the Covington kids, i think he has a strong case. The defense gave up Kyle's phone records willingly when the prosecution couldn't crack his phone. If there was any hint of Proud boy in him, it would've made it to the court room. In short, boy gonna get paid.
Maybe he won't sue because maybe they don't want to stick their necks out just in case "evidence" could exist, they're just not sure who's holding on to it.

1 edit

@kmax87 said
Maybe he won't sue because maybe they don't want to stick their necks out just in case "evidence" could exist, they're just not sure who's holding on to it.
By "Evidence" do you mean the two witnesses that attacked Kyle, that the prosecution didn't call? One of whome (Drop kick man, Maurice Freedman) had his identity with held from the Defene? Or do you mean the doctored footage? Or the footage that was given to the defence at a lower resolution? Or maybe you mean the phone records of one of the assailants that the prosecution had a warrant for, but refused to use?

Or do you mean the unicorn pixie dust evidence that you guys always hold on to when you find out the main stream media lied to you again?

They lied to you about the covington kids
They lied to you about Russiagate.
They lied to you about Jessie Smullet.
They lied to you about Hunter Biden.

At some point you really have to put the Kool Aid cup down, and ask yourself why you're so god damn gullible.


@mott-the-hoople said
…sue biden for defamation of character?
What character ??
I had never heard of the guy before this mess.
There's nothing to defame.


@shavixmir said

I wouldn’t be surprised if the little brat got lynched at some point in the foreseeable future.
I wouldn't either, given the way the left feels about the United States Constitution.

1 edit

@mghrn55 said
What character ??
I had never heard of the guy before this mess.
There's nothing to defame.
Claiming he was a white supremacist, calling him a murderer, saying he was out looking for people to kill, etc. is defamation of character.
You don't have to be a celebrity to have your character defamed.


Take the contracts
Write a book
Accumulate the cash
Buy 100 acres of land in Texas
Build a well fortified house
Disappear - off grid


@huckleberryhound said
By "Evidence" do you mean the two witnesses that attacked Kyle, that the prosecution didn't call? One of whome (Drop kick man, Maurice Freedman) had his identity with held from the Defene? Or do you mean the doctored footage? Or the footage that was given to the defence at a lower resolution? Or maybe you mean the phone records of one of the assailants that the prose ...[text shortened]... oint you really have to put the Kool Aid cup down, and ask yourself why you're so god damn gullible.
damn…very well said👍


@mghrn55 said
What character ??
I had never heard of the guy before this mess.
There's nothing to defame.
OMG…how ignorant


@shavixmir said
Just because a jury declared him not-guilty of murder, doesn’t mean he should have been there, nor that he should be carrying a gun nor that he didn’t murder two people.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the little brat got lynched at some point in the foreseeable future.
ah comrade…settle down


@shavixmir said
Just because a jury declared him not-guilty of murder, doesn’t mean he should have been there, nor that he should be carrying a gun nor that he didn’t murder two people.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the little brat got lynched at some point in the foreseeable future.
Should the other guys have been there? Just trying to level your playing field, Shav.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@huckleberryhound said
By "Evidence" do you mean the two witnesses that attacked Kyle, that the prosecution didn't call? One of whome (Drop kick man, Maurice Freedman) had his identity with held from the Defene? Or do you mean the doctored footage? Or the footage that was given to the defence at a lower resolution? Or maybe you mean the phone records of one of the assailants that the prose ...[text shortened]... oint you really have to put the Kool Aid cup down, and ask yourself why you're so god damn gullible.
Heh hunter biden came up. Again.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.