@dood111 saidUsually not, because some low-life white racist fucck always has to give him a hard time for existing, and ever since half of America elected a blatant racist for president, touted his connection to white supremacy groups, then insisted that he was screwed out of a second term, they've been emboldened to push the issue. Suddenly blatant racism is okay. Just read this forum for confirmation of that.
You should stop talking about it 24/7 and stop this weird mania you have for acting like a black person can't go to the store without experiencing racism in some way.
How many black people are in your neighborhood? I'd guess few to none, maybe that's why you don't see it through your rose-colored glasses. After all, white people are angels, don't you know.
@averagejoe1 saidHow does the "OK" sign even look like an "OK"?
So Segal tells the world that he is copping the OK sign? If I tell you that I am going to make the SAE handshake ( a fraternity, for you foreigners) the secret sign of my movement to wipe out all the bears in the Smokey Mountains, would this be made a part of our societal communications?
Just trying to follow all the logic and common sense here.
When the sign is positioned so the thumb is to the viewers right, the sign clearly looks like a "WP", for White Power.
Google "WP" images and you'll see any number of white supremacists using the sign. You cannot "unsee" it.
@mott-the-hoople saidBecause he's the subject of numerous Republican fairy tales.
why are you so triggered about hunter biden?
You know, lies.
And now KR will get his own chapter in the Big Book of Republican Fairy Tales.
@suzianne saidOK sign is couple hundred years old and it's never meant anything but OK.
How does the "OK" sign even look like an "OK"?
When the sign is positioned so the thumb is to the viewers right, the sign clearly looks like a "WP", for White Power.
Google "WP" images and you'll see any number of white supremacists using the sign. You cannot "unsee" it.
You are just seeing what you want to see.
@huckleberryhound saidNo bias here, no sireee.
By "Evidence" do you mean the two witnesses that attacked Kyle, that the prosecution didn't call? One of whome (Drop kick man, Maurice Freedman) had his identity with held from the Defene? Or do you mean the doctored footage? Or the footage that was given to the defence at a lower resolution? Or maybe you mean the phone records of one of the assailants that the prose ...[text shortened]... oint you really have to put the Kool Aid cup down, and ask yourself why you're so god damn gullible.
@dood111 saidTruth defames no one. He is what he is. Guilty.
Claiming he was a white supremacist, calling him a murderer, saying he was out looking for people to kill, etc. is defamation of character.
You don't have to be a celebrity to have your character defamed.
You do have to be innocent to be defamed.
@mott-the-hoople saidAnd you actually balk when we say that American conservatives are the dumbest people on the planet, yet you continue to prove it every day.
damn…very well said👍
@averagejoe1 saidYes, it was a legal protest.
Should the other guys have been there? Just trying to level your playing field, Shav.
But in your Tucker Carlson addled mind, you think protesting = rioting.
Funny, KR was under the same illusion.
@suzianne saidHere's a picture of the "legal protest" aftermath. There are hundreds more just like it:
Yes, it was a legal protest.
But in your Tucker Carlson addled mind, you think protesting = rioting.
Funny, KR was under the same illusion.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/Car_Source_Kenosha_Burned_out_car_lot.jpg