Go back
Special Counsel Appointment

Special Counsel Appointment

Debates


@Mott-The-Hoople
It is truly astounding that our friends on the Forum are behind this sweetheart deal, freeing Hunter from some crimes not even known about or committed. Truly astounding.
It is all over the internet if you are not familiar with this case, where the judge threw all that sleaze out of her courtroom. Nothing to discuss, really, but you may find interesting reading.


@vivify said
Barr was handpicked by Trump, and Barr picked Durham.

Are you saying Trump picks "swamp" to work for him?
people can be bought…you know but rather wallow in you world of self pity


@vivify said
Barr was handpicked by Trump, and Barr picked Durham.

Are you saying Trump picks "swamp" to work for him?
As I said above, let us read you and Sonhouse banter about it.
Who is Barr, we can start there.


@no1marauder said
There was no "sweetheart deal" granting Hunter Biden general immunity besides the tax and gun charges: that's a persistent right wing talking point that can charitably called a "myth".
?
Hmmm, then what caused the judge to throw the sleaze out? Never mind, dont answer, it is all over the internet.


@averagejoe1 said
?
Hmmm, then what caused the judge to throw the sleaze out? Never mind, dont answer, it is all over the internet.
You're a gullible fool to believe something because "it's all over the internet."


@averagejoe1 said
@Mott-The-Hoople
It is truly astounding that our friends on the Forum are behind this sweetheart deal, freeing Hunter from some crimes not even known about or committed. Truly astounding.
It is all over the internet if you are not familiar with this case, where the judge threw all that sleaze out of her courtroom. Nothing to discuss, really, but you may find interesting reading.
Like I've been saying all along, Joe, he's a democrat. Bag job. Forget about it.


@no1marauder said
You're a gullible fool to believe something because "it's all over the internet."
you are a stupid fool to believe if something is all over the internet it is NOT true


@mott-the-hoople said
people can be bought…you know but rather wallow in you world of self pity
Who paid Barr then? Any information on that with sources? Or are you just making things up again?

Hint: we already know the answer.


@no1marauder said
You're a gullible fool to believe something because "it's all over the internet."
easy marauder (no caps intended). By all over the internet, I mean that all media sources splash this stuff on their websites. I should have said 'all over the number of websites that speak to current events, current news'.
Why, I think you are pretending you don't know what I mean?
Everyone, what do you think about No1's response? I think he is trying to make me look bad. Like , I should say, 'You are right, don't believe a thing you read on the internet". Pick it up Marauder, these posts waste space. Even Sonhouse and Suzianne 'get' my point.
Or, Sue and Sonhouse can regard me as a 'gullible fool'.


@no1marauder said
Keep drinking the Fox News Kool-aid, KJ.
Can you show me how I am wrong, instead of putting down a single news source?


@kellyjay said
Can you show me how I am wrong, instead of putting down a single news source?
Consider the possibility that a 5 year investigation still hasn't turned up any substantial, competent evidence of any criminal wrongdoing by Hunter Biden (besides the relatively minor charges in the indictment).

At the sentencing hearing for those crimes, the judge asked whether the plea agreement granted Hunter Biden general immunity from any charges and immediately the prosecution answered "no". This is a matter of public record that right wing media keeps ignoring.


@no1marauder said
Consider the possibility that a 5 year investigation still hasn't turned up any substantial, competent evidence of any criminal wrongdoing by Hunter Biden (besides the relatively minor charges in the indictment).

At the sentencing hearing for those crimes, the judge asked whether the plea agreement granted Hunter Biden general immunity from any charges and immediately ...[text shortened]... e prosecution answered "no". This is a matter of public record that right wing media keeps ignoring.
Concerning the investigation we also found that the whistleblowers talked about how information was withheld from them that the investigation did know about, this on top of having crimes fall off due to no charges due to the statute of limitations that they could have charged him over. When the public record part of this you talked about came up and the judge questioned it so the prosecution answered "no," the defense had a cow as they were sure that was what they were getting.

Seriously, how many other people would the government treat the way they did Hunter, on top of having the FBI run interference before all of these things with social media companies suppressing the laptop story? I considered the possibilities, what he was charged with wasn't the only issue. Acting as a foreign agent but not registering what is the name for that, I also lost count of it because there was so much of it coming in from so many different countries and companies, exactly how much money was sent to the Biden family in the time he was in the VP and Presidential office?

1 edit

@kellyjay said
Concerning the investigation we also found that the whistleblowers talked about how information was withheld from them that the investigation did know about, this on top of having crimes fall off due to no charges due to the statute of limitations that they could have charged him over. When the public record part of this you talked about came up and the judge questioned it s ...[text shortened]... ly how much money was sent to the Biden family in the time he was in the VP and Presidential office?
Two simple questions:

1) What is the most serious crime you believe Hunter committed?

2) Jared Kushner Received $2 Billion from the Saudi Government only six months after Trump left office:

https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-turn-jared-kushner-crossed-line-1819069

Is this evidence of corruption since Kushner clearly used his ties with Trump to get this deal? Keep in mind that Trump sold weapons to Saudi Arabia.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said.

Seriously, how many other people would the government treat the way they did Hunter, on top of having the FBI run interference before all of these things with social media companies suppressing the laptop story? I considered the possibilities, what he was charged with wasn't the only issue. Acting as a foreign agent but not registering what is the name for that, I als ...[text shortened]... ly how much money was sent to the Biden family in the time he was in the VP and Presidential office?
Marauder?


@vivify said
Two simple questions:

1) What is the most serious crime you believe Hunter committed?

2) Jared Kushner Received $2 Billion from the Saudi Government only six months after Trump left office:

https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-turn-jared-kushner-crossed-line-1819069

Is this evidence of corruption since Kushner clearly used his ties with Trump to get this deal? Keep in mind that Trump sold weapons to Saudi Arabia.
Bribery, extortion, acting as a foreign agent without registering, drugs, weapons, and that is just the stuff we know about. I have no idea what you are talking about concerning 2 billion going to Jared Kushner, and what does that have to do with Biden? Do you think if you find something smelly with someone else, that makes all of the crimes we know about void?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.