Originally posted by zeeblebotOk. Just say so. You have "delusions of grandeur".
each person gets one vote, the table is accumulating the tallies for the two tickets (in the first two columns) as it grows downward ... the third column logs the vote for the RHPer in the fourth column ...
i think we have to stick with condi/colin, it's more symmetric, and it's a mercy to the hillary/biden/barach/bayh ticket, they're the non-incumbe ...[text shortened]... ance they can get ... life won't be as much fun when their party goes the way of the Whigs ...
What are you expecting? A thousand votes?
Surprise!
You may get ten.
Originally posted by StarValleyWyright on both counts ... ten thousand votes! we need a another column! ... (good thing you caught that before we hit 1000 ...) ...
Ok. Just say so. You have "delusions of grandeur".
What are you expecting? A thousand votes?
Surprise!
You may get ten.
a. Condi/Colin
b. Hillary/Biden
------------------
tot c/c h/b c/c
tot tot tot or h/b
--- --- --- ---
001 001 000 c/c zeeblebot
002 001 001 h/b telerion
002 001 001 void Ragnorak
003 001 002 h/b moldy crow
004 002 002 c/c flyUnity
005 002 003 h/b bbar
006 003 003 c/c StarValleyWy
Originally posted by zeeblebotLike I said... "visions of grandeur."
yeah but that way at the end someone's got to go thru all the posts and tally the votes ... this way we don't need an end, and by 2008 we could have upwards of 200,000 RHP votes collected ... plus we know at any time what the current total is ...
You ain't gettin' but twelve votes in this thread dude.
Just list them. You don't need a "chart".
And God damned it... correct your errors. svw votes for "newt and condi" Ok?
Originally posted by StarValleyWyzeeble, both SVW and FU should be purged from the voting roles for RHP felony violations. Why are we allowing these people a vote?
Like I said... "visions of grandeur."
You ain't gettin' but twelve votes in this thread dude.
Just list them. You don't need a "chart".
And God damned it... correct your errors. svw votes for "newt and condi" Ok?
001 001 000 c/c zeeblebot
002 001 001 h/b telerion
002 001 001 void Ragnorak
003 001 002 h/b moldy crow
004 002 002 c/c flyUnity
005 002 003 h/b bbar
006 003 003 c/c StarValleyWy
007 004 003 h/b Amaurote
This table looks like it's been constructed by a Floridian, are you really going to trust us not to screw up the totals?
Far too right-wing for my tastes, and I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more, but she was still by far the bravest person in Clinton's first administration.
Oh my god it's florida all over again!
zeeble put c/c in the first slot. Am clearly meant to vote for h/b, but because of the biased system Am's vote goes for c/c.
It should read as follows:
001 001 000 c/c zeeblebot
002 001 001 h/b telerion
002 001 001 void Ragnorak
003 001 002 h/b moldy crow
004 001 002 c/c flyUnity (purged from rolls due to RHP felony)
005 001 003 h/b bbar
006 001 003 c/c StarValleyWy (purged from rolls due to RHP felony)
007 001 004 h/b Amaurote
Originally posted by telerionSVW is right. Why put the relative accumulated scores?
Oh my god it's florida all over again!
zeeble put c/c in the first slot. Am clearly meant to vote for h/b, but because of the biased system Am's vote goes for c/c.
It should read as follows:
001 001 000 c/c zeeblebot
002 001 001 h/b telerion
002 001 001 void Ragnorak
003 001 002 h/b moldy crow
004 001 002 c/c flyUnity (purged from rolls due ...[text shortened]... 006 001 003 c/c StarValleyWy (purged from rolls due to RHP felony)
007 001 004 h/b Amaurote
c/c zeeblebot
h/b telerion
void Ragnorak
h/b moldy crow
c/c flyUnity (purged from rolls due to RHP felony)
h/b bbar
c/c StarValleyWy (purged from rolls due to RHP felony)
h/b Amaurote
Totals:
c/c - 3
h/b- 4
a. Condi/Colin
b. Hillary/Biden
------------------
tot c/c h/b c/c
tot tot tot or h/b
--- --- --- ---
001 001 000 c/c zeeblebot
002 001 001 h/b telerion
002 001 001 void Ragnorak
003 001 002 h/b moldy crow
004 002 002 c/c flyUnity
005 002 003 h/b bbar
006 003 003 c/c StarValleyWy (has a write-in for Newt/Condi but Newt washed out in the primaries)
007 003 004 h/b Amaurote
(i don't see any non-felonious voters yet, here is a table just for them: 000 000 000.)
(we need a running tally to prevent the h/b3 side from clearing out the middle column.)
(i agree, Amaurote probably meant to go h/b3 and was confused by the ballot. following Florida Supreme Court precedents we should guess what he meant and swap his tally, especially if swapping his tally means a vote for h/b3.)
