Debates
20 Nov 23
@AverageJoe1
Tell that to Judge Wallace:
https://whyy.org/articles/colorado-judge-trump-engaged-in-insurrection-rejects-constitutional-ballot-challenge/#:~:text=The%20decision%20by%20District%20Judge,knock%20Trump%20off%20the%20ballot.
You wouldn't get THAT on Newsmax would you?
21 Nov 23
@averagejoe1 saidI think because the tapes do not prove insurrection.
The tapes are prpbably already released, why isn't Sonhouse on it!?!??
I think because the tapes do not prove insurrection. Sonhouse wants it to prove insurrection so that Biden can lead for 4 more years and ruin our lives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOa8S10mSvk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Opy7MLGAPBk
Joe, who hasn't viewed even 1% of these tapes is convinced "the tapes do not prove insurrection." Good to see you're making such well informed decisions Joe.
If the boys in your news source told you there were 8 legged mice on the moon, would you believe that too?
@mchill said'Well informed' is the correct phrase. I am 'well informed'; by people in the know. I am not informed by you or, for heavens sake' Sonhouse. Nor the linkster, Marauder.
I think because the tapes do not prove insurrection.
Joe, who hasn't viewed even 1% of these tapes is convinced "the tapes do not prove insurrection." Good to see you're making such well informed decisions Joe.
If the boys in your news source told you there were 8 legged mice on the moon, would you believe that too?
Think of the time spent on this by lawyers and their underlings 'in the stacks', a law school phrase. Study study study, worky worky....Not one of these people Educated In The Law find any insurrection. I am, of course, assuming that they have studied these tapes. THAT is why I am convinced. I have not studied squat, we pay people to do that. So I only base my Forum opinions on very good sources. Everyone in the WH probably thinks exactly like Sonhouse. Guilty!!
21 Nov 23
@averagejoe1 said'Well informed' is the correct phrase. I am 'well informed';
'Well informed' is the correct phrase. I am 'well informed'; by people in the know. I am not informed by you or, for heavens sake' Sonhouse. Nor the linkster, Marauder.
Think of the time spent on this by lawyers and their underlings 'in the stacks', a law school phrase. Study study study, worky worky....Not one of these people Educated In The Law find any insur ...[text shortened]... opinions on very good sources. Everyone in the WH probably thinks exactly like Sonhouse. Guilty!!
You've not viewed even 1% of these tapes, but you're "well informed" on this subject? You'll have to excuse now me Joe, I'm due back on planet earth. 🙄
@mchill saidNot well informed on the subject ins and outs, but on that which is told to me BY the people who inform us all. By 'well', I am aware of the veracity of info and who it comes from. I am on the other side of the prosecution, but I know they are studying and (having to) conform to court procedures and be honest in their findings. I have total faith in the extreme diligence of Trump lawyers,,,,,,thus, I am well informed.
'Well informed' is the correct phrase. I am 'well informed';
You've not viewed even 1% of these tapes, but you're "well informed" on this subject? You'll have to excuse now me Joe, I'm due back on planet earth. 🙄
You seem to know a lot about it, and I think Sonhouse thinks there was an insurrection. Does he inform you? Does he cite sources, or just type to himself?
PS: I have not viewed any of the tapes. It makes my posting no less effective. Shining a light on it, don't you know.
@averagejoe1 saidNot well informed? Every newspaper in America called it an assault, mob, attack, siege, and/or insurrection on the day after it happened. What other info are you referring to? It is only the revisionists who wanna pretend it didn't happen. A MAGA cult.
Not well informed on the subject ins and outs, but on that which is told to me BY the people who inform us all. By 'well', I am aware of the veracity of info and who it comes from. I am on the other side of the prosecution, but I know they are studying and (having to) conform to court procedures and be honest in their findings. I have total faith in the extreme diligen ...[text shortened]... ed any of the tapes. It makes my posting no less effective. Shining a light on it, don't you know.
21 Nov 23
@wildgrass saidAs to 'informed' you speak of facts that are not proven, so I don't trust them. If we all knew what 'actually' happened, there would never be a hearing.....Hey, is that hearing still going on. So your post is dead out of the gate. I cannot IMAGINE following the lives of all these rabid people, on both sides. Don't care. So, yes, my being informed is people I trust, like at Breitbart, keeping us all apprised. For what that is worth. As to the girl killed, she should not have been there, her fault. As to the cop, that was his job.
Not well informed? Every newspaper in America called it an assault, mob, attack, siege, and/or insurrection on the day after it happened. What other info are you referring to? It is only the revisionists who wanna pretend it didn't happen. A MAGA cult.
21 Nov 23
@averagejoe1 saidRevisionist history. Breitbart was critical of the insurrection. They changed their tune because of the cult. Now they sow doubt into your brain ( wait there's more tape,? Does the new tape negate the old tape? Maybe it was the reptoids? What we all saw on TV was not really a riot. It was soo peaceful.) so you can pretend what you saw wasn't a riot.
As to 'informed' you speak of facts that are not proven, so I don't trust them. If we all knew what 'actually' happened, there would never be a hearing.....Hey, is that hearing still going on. So your post is dead out of the gate. I cannot IMAGINE following the lives of all these rabid people, on both sides. Don't care. So, yes, my being informed is people I trust, li ...[text shortened]... As to the girl killed, she should not have been there, her fault. As to the cop, that was his job.
If you only listen to people you agree with then you end up with a knotted pine tree where the brain once was.
21 Nov 23
@wildgrass saidDid I say there was no riot? You writing to me?
Revisionist history. Breitbart was critical of the insurrection. They changed their tune because of the cult. Now they sow doubt into your brain ( wait there's more tape,? Does the new tape negate the old tape? Maybe it was the reptoids? What we all saw on TV was not really a riot. It was soo peaceful.) so you can pretend what you saw wasn't a riot.
If you only listen to people you agree with then you end up with a knotted pine tree where the brain once was.
Remember when y’all could never produce a lie that Tucker told? Just pitiful. So, now produce a lie that Breibart told.
21 Nov 23
@averagejoe1 saidNo lie. They revise history.
Did I say there was no riot? You writing to me?
Remember when y’all could never produce a lie that Tucker told? Just pitiful. So, now produce a lie that Breibart told.
The riot was real. Not peaceful.
@averagejoe1 saidUnfortunately joe we have all seen the tapes showing insurrectionists attacking capitol police and violently smashing their way into the building and hunting down trumps hit list in order to hang them or dispatch them in some way
Not well informed on the subject ins and outs, but on that which is told to me BY the people who inform us all. By 'well', I am aware of the veracity of info and who it comes from. I am on the other side of the prosecution, but I know they are studying and (having to) conform to court procedures and be honest in their findings. I have total faith in the extreme diligen ...[text shortened]... ed any of the tapes. It makes my posting no less effective. Shining a light on it, don't you know.
You could have 40,000 hrs of tape showing that not happening but it is irrelevant to the reality of what happened live on tv
@AverageJoe1
I imagine you will just rationalize this one like you do all the others but here is one truth about FUKKER Carlson:
https://www.npr.org/2023/04/25/1171800317/how-tucker-carlsons-extremist-narratives-shaped-fox-news-and-conservative-politi
And why are you touting that 40,000 hour propaganda piece anyway? Do you think that is going to rewrite history and the historians are going to write, yep just another peaceful political discourse? What do you think was the goal here with the publication of those tapes by a known Trumpite, Mike Johnson, the squeaker of the house. Do think those tapes somehow exhonerates Trump? He is now innocent of being the ultimate leader of the insurrection because good old boy Mikey puts out all those tapes?
24 Nov 23
@sonhouse saidHow did Judge Wallace explain why so many insurrectionists forgot to bring guns?
@AverageJoe1
Tell that to Judge Wallace:
https://whyy.org/articles/colorado-judge-trump-engaged-in-insurrection-rejects-constitutional-ballot-challenge/#:~:text=The%20decision%20by%20District%20Judge,knock%20Trump%20off%20the%20ballot.
You wouldn't get THAT on Newsmax would you?