Go back
The reflecting pool in Washington

The reflecting pool in Washington

Debates

Vote Up
3
Vote Down
-2

@PuzZuLz said
Riiiight, so you're planning on some leftist activist judges to throw the charges out. I see.

I suggest you stay away from sports and the fans.
They don't like people who gamble and then don't pay.
The boundary conditions were clearly set.

You were proabbyl one of the first who were unhappy with people taking a conviction for granted in the Trump cases.
So that someone has been arrested or even been accused of something says nothing about the truth.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@Ponderable

5 people have been arrested for vandalizing the reflecting pool, another 5 were issued citations.
14 separate incidents.

The Guardian is as anti trump as you can get and they wrote about it.
One person cut a 250 foot gash in the liner.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jun/22/trump-reflecting-pool-vandalized-lincoln-memorial-iran-us-politics-latest-news-updates

Vote Up
3
Vote Down
-1

@PuzZuLz said
@Ponderable

5 people have been arrested for vandalizing the reflecting pool, another 5 were issued citations.
14 separate incidents.

The Guardian is as anti trump as you can get and they wrote about it.
One person cut a 250 foot gash in the liner.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jun/22/trump-reflecting-pool-vandalized-lincoln-memorial-iran-us-politics-latest-news-updates
I did not doubt that people have been arrested.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@Ponderable said
I did not doubt that people have been arrested.
So you're hoping the DC activist judges throw the cases out?

You clearly can't believe they are all just innocent people walking by 🙄

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@shavixmir
@moonbus
@wildgrass

I guess The Guardian, a news company that absolutely hates Trump is writing about the damage and arrests.

Stupid thread by @shavixmir he thought it was just shoddy work. And yet, crazy anti Americans were damaging the pool.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jun/22/trump-reflecting-pool-vandalized-lincoln-memorial-iran-us-politics-latest-news-updates

Vote Up
3
Vote Down
-2

@PuzZuLz said
So you're hoping the DC activist judges throw the cases out?

You clearly can't believe they are all just innocent people walking by 🙄
No. I am not hoping anything. I doubt that there will be convictions.
Arresting somebody is very easy get them convicted not so. There is "reasonalbe doubt".
I ahve read that at least one of the person was arrested, because they fished out a flab of color from the "pool". To prove that they losened it (probably without any tool) will be not easy at least.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-4

@Ponderable

Since you think they are all innocent, they must be preparing some rock solid false arrest lawsuits then right?

Or did you say guilty but hard to prove? That would imply you think they are guilty right?

Which one?

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-4

@Ponderable said
I did not doubt that people have been arrested.
And the rest??

Vote Up
4
Vote Down
-1

@PuzZuLz said
@shavixmir
@moonbus
@wildgrass

I guess The Guardian, a news company that absolutely hates Trump is writing about the damage and arrests.

Stupid thread by @shavixmir he thought it was just shoddy work. And yet, crazy anti Americans were damaging the pool.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jun/22/trump-reflecting-pool-vandalized-lincoln-memorial-iran-us-politics-latest-news-updates
same article
guardian update
pussle is a dummy

2h ago
10.04 EDT
Trump continues evidence-free and changing claims about reflecting pool
Further to our earlier post about the reported arrests made and federal citations issued after the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool was allegedly “vandalized”, Donald Trump has claimed that the pool “has been given a 300 foot long gash, chemicals have been illegally placed in the water, and the beautiful new grass field has been destroyed with a gigantic 86 47 chemically carved into it.”

It’s worth noting that on Saturday, Trump alleged a “250 foot gash” and has still not provided evidence of that, and now appears to be claiming it was actually 300 ft.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-5

@rookie54 said
same article
guardian update
pussle is a dummy

2h ago
10.04 EDT
Trump continues evidence-free and changing claims about reflecting pool
Further to our earlier post about the reported arrests made and federal citations issued after the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool was allegedly “vandalized”, Donald Trump has claimed that the pool “has been given a 300 foot long ga ...[text shortened]... and has still not provided evidence of that, and now appears to be claiming it was actually 300 ft.
Can you not see all the made up things in this article that they have no way of knowing? I don’t think so considering that you post it.

Vote Up
4
Vote Down
-1

@PuzZuLz said
@shavixmir
@moonbus
@wildgrass

I guess The Guardian, a news company that absolutely hates Trump is writing about the damage and arrests.

Stupid thread by @shavixmir he thought it was just shoddy work. And yet, crazy anti Americans were damaging the pool.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jun/22/trump-reflecting-pool-vandalized-lincoln-memorial-iran-us-politics-latest-news-updates
Really. Is there evidence?
Has the story been updated yet?
Who’s been arrested?

Ahhhh…

Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@shavixmir

David Hearn was arrested.
A former Olympic athlete who's Facebook page is nothing but anti Trump BS.

4 others were arrested too. Why ask when you're just going to deny everything.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

@rookie54

Sorry if the courts don't think notifying your woke joke life is important when it comes to the people who were arrested.

I can absolutely see you thinking you're important enough to be notified but no you're not.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

This is all they have lulz

@rookie54 gonna hit us with some "Braking News" 🤣

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

@PuzZuLz said
@shavixmir

David Hearn was arrested.
A former Olympic athlete who's Facebook page is nothing but anti Trump BS.

4 others were arrested too. Why ask when you're just going to deny everything.
Source?