03 Oct 14
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2773672/The-rich-richer-400-wealthiest-Americans-worth-2-3TRILLION-34billion-Mark-Zuckerberg-cracks-Forbes-10-time.html#ixzz3EjAzQqgx
The list regarding those who are the richest in America is like reading a democrat whose who list.
Just keep focusing on taxing income guys, that way the wealth that you have attained will not be matched, paving the way for your offspring to be our future slave masters.
Originally posted by whodeyAs always, I am refreshed by your sunny outlook.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2773672/The-rich-richer-400-wealthiest-Americans-worth-2-3TRILLION-34billion-Mark-Zuckerberg-cracks-Forbes-10-time.html#ixzz3EjAzQqgx
The list regarding those who are the richest in America is like reading a democrat whose who list.
Just keep focusing on taxing income guys, that way the wealth that you have attained will not be matched, paving the way for your offspring to be our future slave masters.
03 Oct 14
Originally posted by whodeyThis has nothing to do with Obama. It is a general trend in the US and has been for a very long time.
The rich get richer under Obama
Certainly Obama hasn't significantly reversed any policies that favor the trend. But nor is he responsible for putting the policies in place.
Whats more notable, is that you are a supporter of the policies in question, so its kind of odd that you appear to be critical of the results.
If you are interested in the subject, here is a video about the same situation in the UK although it is not nearly as bad as the US:
If you really don't like the trend, then I suggest you have a look at Finland and consider emulating their politics.
03 Oct 14
Originally posted by twhiteheadDo you support the UK emulating Finland?
This has nothing to do with Obama. It is a general trend in the US and has been for a very long time.
Certainly Obama hasn't significantly reversed any policies that favor the trend. But nor is he responsible for putting the policies in place.
Whats more notable, is that you are a supporter of the policies in question, so its kind of odd that you appe ...[text shortened]... like the trend, then I suggest you have a look at Finland and consider emulating their politics.
04 Oct 14
Originally posted by twhiteheadOf course it's not Obama's fault, nothing ever is.
This has nothing to do with Obama. It is a general trend in the US and has been for a very long time.
Certainly Obama hasn't significantly reversed any policies that favor the trend. But nor is he responsible for putting the policies in place.
Whats more notable, is that you are a supporter of the policies in question, so its kind of odd that you appe ...[text shortened]... like the trend, then I suggest you have a look at Finland and consider emulating their politics.
What I do know is that filth like Obama depend on these rich folks to fork over money for their campaigns. He could not have done it without them.
04 Oct 14
Originally posted by KazetNagorraHow is Ron Paul any different than Obama? The only difference between the two would be the letter next to the name affiliated with the Aristocrat.
How about a genuine proposal? Maybe Ron Paul's proposal to abolish the middle class by re-instituting the aristocracy will help the middle class?
Big government = European Feudal System.
The American Revolution is proving to truly be a revolution.
04 Oct 14
Originally posted by EladarRon Paul is different from Obama at least in the sense that whodey appears to support or has supported Ron Paul.
How is Ron Paul any different than Obama? The only difference between the two would be the letter next to the name affiliated with the Aristocrat.
Big government = European Feudal System.
The American Revolution is proving to truly be a revolution.
You do know that in a feudal system, the central government is weak, right?
Originally posted by KazetNagorraYou really aren't too bright are you? If you do have a high IQ, then it has been replaced with brainwashing.
Ron Paul is different from Obama at least in the sense that whodey appears to support or has supported Ron Paul.
You do know that in a feudal system, the central government is weak, right?
Originally posted by LundosYou mean that in a Feudal system the government doesn't rule over its citizens?
You really should read a history book. You might learn something.
In the US the citizens are supposed to rule over the government. The US is supposed to be the land of the people who are free from government interference and domination.