@AverageJoe1 saidYes, you imbecile, when a high ranking member of the government accuses someone of "treason" we expect them to present some evidence of such an incendiary charge not "Oh maybe we'll come up with something later".
But why do you people keep boring us by asking us 'Show us the Treason". Do you not see that that is waht they too are looking for.???? Marauder is the same way, Wants it now. Patience, children. Why dont you run over to Epstein and check back in a few weeks
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, it's not, and it doesn't matter how much this administration of lies, well, lies, this will never, ever, ever be true.
Treason?. If James Madison and Samuel Adams had tried to illegally affect a ballot box to get rid of George Washington, that might not fit the def of Treason, but what would it be? Which is what Obama did.......to Trump.
If you want an example, or multiple examples, of treason, look no further than 6 January, 2021.
The truth about Barack Obama is that even though he probably is a holographic thinker, he tends to be rather loquacious, whether or not other people would be willing to sit still for that outside of the confines of a college classroom.
However, in his defense, although I imagine he is quite capable of coming up with some succinct, post-Voltairian aphorisms, that might not be how he would wish to express himself, on principle, and based on his holographic considerations.
@no1marauder saidThere was no direct accusation of Treason, 'arrest that man'. There is a directive by Gabbard to look into the possibilty. Your posts are getting bit haywire. And look at the news this very minute, she is already turning up damning stuff.
Yes, you imbecile, when a high ranking member of the government accuses someone of "treason" we expect them to present some evidence of such an incendiary charge not "Oh maybe we'll come up with something later".
Curious....do you not want to get to the bottom of this? What if Clapper and Brennan et al did all what we think they did? Marauder, do we forgive and forget? What do you want, anyway?
@Suzianne saidsaying lie all the time dilutes your posts the last administration lied
No, it's not, and it doesn't matter how much this administration of lies, well, lies, this will never, ever, ever be true.
If you want an example, or multiple examples, of treason, look no further than 6 January, 2021.
I feel like a college professor grading papers
@AverageJoe1 saidNo man you gotta stop with this. She accused him of treason and said she already had evidence of it.
There was no direct accusation of Treason, 'arrest that man'. There is a directive by Gabbard to look into the possibilty. Your posts are getting bit haywire. And look at the news this very minute, she is already turning up damning stuff.
Curious....do you not want to get to the bottom of this? What if Clapper and Brennan et al did all what we think they did? Marauder, do we forgive and forget? What do you want, anyway?
“The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.”
Can you tell me what "multiple pieces of evidence she's talking about? After all those hundreds of FoxNews segments you watched, surely you have some idea.
1 edit
@wildgrass saidLots of ways to say it, but I see no 'arrest that man'. So I'm sure you are right, she said somewhere that Obama has committed treason, i just have not googled that one.
No man you gotta stop with this. She accused him of treason and said she already had evidence of it.
“The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.”
Can you tell me what "multiple pieces ...[text shortened]... talking about? After all those hundreds of FoxNews segments you watched, surely you have some idea.
Anyway, you fellers refuse to watch the process, such being not something you are familiar with, but there is a LOT of fact finding, she has people working 24/7. If it were reversed and Trump were being accused, Kamala would already have him in jail. Just throw him in!.
Hey, she was on Colbert last night, selling her book (imagine Trump hawking a book.. 😆 😆 ...) and he asked her
'Who is the present leader of the dem party?" She said, 'oh, there could be anybody", or some such. Why would not this person, who was close to being president. not have said I AM THE LEADER OF THE DEM PARTY.' A weak loser.
She is preparing to run in 2028, BTW. You heard it here first. She will be asking you for money soon. She spent $1.5Billion last time!!!
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidLol "the process"
Lots of ways to say it, but I see no 'arrest that man'. So I'm sure you are right, she said somewhere that Obama has committed treason, i just have not googled that one.
Anyway, you fellers refuse to watch the process, such being not something you are familiar with, but there is a LOT of fact finding, she has people working 24/7. If it were reversed and Trump were bei ...[text shortened]... You heard it here first. She will be asking you for money soon. She spent $1.5Billion last time!!!
You right wingers sure are suckers for a show.
It's interesting that you keep saying that you're paying attention but can't clearly articulate what tulsi is talking about when she says new evidence. What is in the new evidence that takes it from no wrongdoing to treason?
@AverageJoe1 saidThat's a lie; I already showed you Trump's social media post where he said Obama and others committed "treason".
There was no direct accusation of Treason, 'arrest that man'. There is a directive by Gabbard to look into the possibilty. Your posts are getting bit haywire. And look at the news this very minute, she is already turning up damning stuff.
Curious....do you not want to get to the bottom of this? What if Clapper and Brennan et al did all what we think they did? Marauder, do we forgive and forget? What do you want, anyway?
@wildgrass saidShe says she has the evidence. You think she is lying, is that right? Wow, she is taking quite a risk for her reputation for the rest of her life. Do you think she is taking such a risk? I don't think she is. I think she has the goods.
Lol "the process"
You right wingers sure are suckers for a show.
It's interesting that you keep saying that you're paying attention but can't clearly articulate what tulsi is talking about when she says new evidence. What is in the new evidence that takes it from no wrongdoing to treason?
By process,,,,,those goods??? There is a process in the making public tose goods, such information that will go down in history as our most horrible scandal, so she wants to get it right, so that AI and Media get it right from the start. A process.
Whew.,
@AverageJoe1 saidNo she said she already released the evidence. Everyone has had time to review it. There is no treason.
She says she has the evidence. You think she is lying, is that right? Wow, she is taking quite a risk for her reputation for the rest of her life. Do you think she is taking such a risk? I don't think she is. I think she has the goods.
By process,,,,,those goods??? There is a process in the making public tose goods, such information that will go down in history as ...[text shortened]... she wants to get it right, so that AI and Media get it right from the start. A process.
Whew.,
@no1marauder saidHe may have, political patter, whatever. But are we talking about the findings of Tulsi Gabbard, we are not talking about the findings of Trump.
That's a lie; I already showed you Trump's social media post where he said Obama and others committed "treason".
As an aside, I DO hope that you all at least respect the hell that Trump went through during those years, that he might be a tad upset, and justifiably can be expected to cast a few aspersions at what you tried to do to him. And i think it is reasonable for him to say Obama's actions were treasonous, as you are about to see.
@wildgrass saidOK. Link us the evidence that she has released. I am not aware of it. And of course, follow it up with what 'everyone' responded with, confirming that there was no treason. It is for the experts to decide, not you and me, and certainly not Sonhouse.
No she said she already released the evidence. Everyone has had time to review it. There is no treason.
What did they say, whoever they are?
@AverageJoe1 saidI have no clue. It looks like they just rereleased the Durham report evidence from 2 years ago with a different conclusion. Nothing new at all. Nothing about to surface. Likely a media circus distraction from Epstein
OK. Link us the evidence that she has released. I am not aware of it. And of course, follow it up with what 'everyone' responded with, confirming that there was no treason. It is for the experts to decide, not you and me, and certainly not Sonhouse.
What did they say, whoever they are?
You started the thread mate. You're saying you don't know what tulsi is talking about even after watching a hundred FoxNews segments about it?
@wildgrass saidI did not say that I do not know what Tulsi Gabbard is talking about. What I do have to say has already been said by me 10 times. She is taking her sweet time to get everything right before publishing it because it will all go down in history as the greatest scandal that we have ever had in our 249 years. Our media is very excited about all of this and is reporting every 10 minutes about what she is up to. That is great, so that the populace can be aware of what is about to happen. Instead of writing me about this over and over why won’t you just turn on the news for a couple of days and settle down. Any news will do, because they would all have to report the same thing. The present facts.
I have no clue. It looks like they just rereleased the Durham report evidence from 2 years ago with a different conclusion. Nothing new at all. Nothing about to surface. Likely a media circus distraction from Epstein
You started the thread mate. You're saying you don't know what tulsi is talking about even after watching a hundred FoxNews segments about it?
Why be obstinate with average Joe, I am just trying to keep you all apprised, because you apparently are not.