The Truth about 'Barack' Is About to Surface. Get Ready.

@wildgrass said
You started the thread mate. You're saying you don't know what tulsi is talking about even after watching a hundred FoxNews segments about it?

Seems like Trump is not the only senior citizen slowly losing his marbles.

@AverageJoe1 said
I did not say that I do not know what Tulsi Gabbard is talking about. What I do have to say has already been said by me 10 times. She is taking her sweet time to get everything right before publishing it because it will all go down in history as the greatest scandal that we have ever had in our 249 years. Our media is very excited about all of this and is reporting every ...[text shortened]... stinate with average Joe, I am just trying to keep you all apprised, because you apparently are not.

Why are you saying she's taking her time when she says she already released the treason evidence last week?

@wildgrass said
Why are you saying she's taking her time when she says she already released the treason evidence last week?

We would all like to see it, as I have said.

Check this out. Your realize, I hope, that the landscape changes hourly? If it is all out there, why would there keep being new articles.? You see, this shows that just yestereday we find that the FBI ignored Hillary wrongdoing. DO YOU NOW understand when I say it all still going on??????????????

https://san.com/media-miss/fbi-ignored-key-evidence-in-clinton-email-investigation-doj-watchdog-claims/#:~:text=The%20newly%20declassified%20Clinton%20Annex,in%20the%20newly%20declassified%20documents.

@wildgrass said
Why are you saying she's taking her time when she says she already released the treason evidence last week?

uhhhh, how can you say she released all the evidence, when just now she comes up finding that the FBI ignored the Hillary slime as set out in the link above?
And she will yet find even more stuff. I'd said 2 weeks, it may be longer. But, you say it is already published , put to to bed? They have gone home? You are like writing to Subiianne

@AverageJoe1 said
uhhhh, how can you say she released all the evidence, when just now she comes up finding that the FBI ignored the Hillary slime as set out in the link above?
And she will yet find even more stuff. I'd said 2 weeks, it may be longer. But, you say it is already published , put to to bed? They have gone home? You are like writing to Subiianne

I didn't say she released the evidence. She said it.

She was wrong (or lying).

@AverageJoe1 said
saying lie all the time dilutes your posts the last administration lied

I feel like a college professor grading papers

Oh, please!

This president has a different relationship with lies.

They are his raison d'etre.

But you just don't care. You don't even care if he lies to you, which he does on the regular.


Clearly you grade on the curve, but it's not a bell curve. More of the inverse of that.

@wildgrass said
I didn't say she released the evidence. She said it.

She was wrong (or lying).

You said : she says she already released the treason evidence.
Then you say here that you didn’t say she released the evidence.

Suzanne Ann, can you jump in here and explain to me what he is talking about. He reminds me of Biden at the debate, he does not know what he is talking about.

@Suzianne said
Oh, please!

This president has a different relationship with lies.

They are his raison d'etre.

But you just don't care. You don't even care if he lies to you, which he does on the regular.


Clearly you grade on the curve, but it's not a bell curve. More of the inverse of that.

You are writing about me again. Such posting really goes nowhere. What if I started writing about Sonhouse . Would you want to read it?

@AverageJoe1 said
You said : she says she already released the treason evidence.
Then you say here that you didn’t say she released the evidence.

Suzanne Ann, can you jump in here and explain to me what he is talking about. He reminds me of Biden at the debate, he does not know what he is talking about.

I'm not wasting my time on improving your reading comprehension.

@AverageJoe1 said
You are writing about me again. Such posting really goes nowhere. What if I started writing about Sonhouse . Would you want to read it?

Well, figure it out.

Calling you out as the idiot you are is a Public Service.

@AverageJoe1 said
You said : she says she already released the treason evidence.
Then you say here that you didn’t say she released the evidence.

Suzanne Ann, can you jump in here and explain to me what he is talking about. He reminds me of Biden at the debate, he does not know what he is talking about.

Tulsi says there's a bear in the woods. She says here's evidence the bear is there. Everyone looks, but there is no bear in the woods. Some people (mostly on FoxNews) say they believe they see a bear, but it isn't there. You have to believe in it first.

Then you say wait a minute maybe there will be a bear in the woods but later on. Tulsi is predicting the bear will arrive any day now we just have to hold on.

Is that what's happening?

@Suzianne said
I'm not wasting my time on improving your reading comprehension.

Exactly.

@wildgrass said
Tulsi says there's a bear in the woods. She says here's evidence the bear is there. Everyone looks, but there is no bear in the woods. Some people (mostly on FoxNews) say they believe they see a bear, but it isn't there. You have to believe in it first.

Then you say wait a minute maybe there will be a bear in the woods but later on. Tulsi is predicting the bear will arrive any day now we just have to hold on.

Is that what's happening?

Well, yes, that is a good analogy. If I tell you, there is a bear in your backyard, you may look back there and say no there is not a bear in the backyard , and not believe me. But if the neighbors and people have looked into it, and find that there is bear scat (poop) in the yard, a few dead chickens, and maybe a small bear den where it sleeps at night, we might surmise that there may indeed bea bear, altho there is no sighting of the bear….. Your bear ..that beer is the one we were talking about
So, we call the authorities, Tulsi Gabbard in this case, who sees just enough evidence out there to warrant an investigation in my backyard..
You certainly must follow me up to this point with my analogy, but I have to assume that you have watched the news to see what this present evidence is that is being discovered as we speak. If you want to pretend you don’t know that, then write away.

@AverageJoe1 said
Well, yes, that is a good analogy. If I tell you, there is a bear in your backyard, you may look back there and say no there is not a bear in the backyard , and not believe me. But if the neighbors and people have looked into it, and find that there is bear scat (poop) in the yard, a few dead chickens, and maybe a small bear den where it sleeps at night, we might surmise ...[text shortened]... s that is being discovered as we speak. If you want to pretend you don’t know that, then write away.

If you have to believe in it before you see it, is it really there?

@wildgrass said
If you have to believe in it before you see it, is it really there?

What would Confucius say.
I wonder what Confucius, and Sonhouse and Sue for that matter, say to Trump giving $1000 $1k investements at their birth? It would be worth $8000 in 2oo years, and if they add say $1000 a year as they grow up, imagine how that would compounc?
Do you think Kamala could define compounded interest? Trump can.

So many questions for Confucius. Financial literacy.