1 edit
@wildgrass
I don't remember that, wild, but if true, it must be brought to the public's attention.
In 4 years of possessing the Epstein files, Joe Biden et al said nothing about them.
When Harris ran for president, she also said nothing about the Epstein files.
Donald Trump ran for president and a campaign promise of his was to release the Epstein files.
But you democrats think that only Donald Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files.
hmmmmmmmmmmm.... 😕
@wildgrass saidYou silly Billy . We have made it obvious that y'all do the Epstien Gambit to detract from Hillary, et al, but here she is, in black and white!!!! Really...y'all don't know this is going on?!?!? And you chide US for defending Trump!?!?!?
Someone reminded me what happened the last time there was a big news story about trump and Epstein (remember when it was revealed that he showed up in the flight log at least 7 times???).
Bo, don't remember that?
Maybe thats because that news story came out the day before trump was 'shot' but not wounded in the ear at a campaign event.
He's a terrible leader but masterful at press distraction.
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_412c9d5e-4ec0-491d-9321-7df6cf2e85eb.html
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidSo, once it became public knowledge that the Russian government was interfering in the 2016 election (as every government investigation, including the House Intelligence Committee one, concluded), some Democrats wanted to use that fact as a political issue against Trump.
Yes, and my sish comes true. You fellers just did deeper holes.
(I can't believe that y'all don't know all this is going on)
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_412c9d5e-4ec0-491d-9321-7df6cf2e85eb.html
So what?
@AverageJoe1 saidOh, the "Durham annex".
Yes, and my sish comes true. You fellers just did deeper holes.
(I can't believe that y'all don't know all this is going on)
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_412c9d5e-4ec0-491d-9321-7df6cf2e85eb.html
LOL, what a rube.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidYou believe anything as long as someone on the right writes down their fever dreams.
You silly Billy . We have made it obvious that y'all do the Epstien Gambit to detract from Hillary, et al, but here she is, in black and white!!!! Really...y'all don't know this is going on?!?!? And you chide US for defending Trump!?!?!?
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_412c9d5e-4ec0-491d-9321-7df6cf2e85eb.html
I do not have words for how stupid this is.
Getting desperate, eh?
2 edits
@wildgrass saidReference, the 'terrible leader' part....
Someone reminded me what happened the last time there was a big news story about trump and Epstein (remember when it was revealed that he showed up in the flight log at least 7 times???).
Bo, don't remember that?
Maybe thats because that news story came out the day before trump was 'shot' but not wounded in the ear at a campaign event.
He's a terrible leader but masterful at press distraction.
If the Leader of Mars landed on Borneo and demanded to see ONE PERSON to speak for Earth,..one person in effect representing all countries in the face of this Martian with horns for ears, who (what leader exsting on earth) do you think that our 'conclaves' would select? To negotiate, and defend, our world???
Don't everyone answer all at once!!
@no1marauder saidSo see, I guess.
So, once it became public knowledge that the Russian government was interfering in the 2016 election (as every government investigation, including the House Intelligence Committee one, concluded), some Democrats wanted to use that fact as a political issue against Trump.
So what?
@AverageJoe1 saidBill Pullman, obviously...
Reference, the 'terrible leader' part....
If the Leader of Mars landed on Borneo and demanded to see ONE PERSON to speak for Earth,..one person in effect representing all countries in the face of this Martian with horns for ears, who (what leader exsting on earth) do you think that our 'conclaves' would select? To negotiate, and defend, our world???
Don't everyone answer all at once!!
"In less than an hour, aircraft from here will join others from around the world, and you will be launching the largest aerial battle in the history of mankind... Mankind. That word should have new meaning for all of us today. We can't be consumed by our petty differences anymore. We will be united in our common interests. Perhaps it's fate that today is the Fourth of July, and you will once again be fighting for our freedom. Not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution… but from annihilation. We're fighting for our right to live. To exist. And should we win the day, the Fourth of July will no longer be known as an American holiday, but as the day when the world declared in one voice: We will not go quietly into the night! We will not vanish without a fight! We're going to live on! We're going to survive! Today we celebrate our Independence Day!"
@wildgrass saidDon't know of Pullman, but seems like he would have said, we will need an effective strong leader. We shall prevail!!!!!
Bill Pullman, obviously...
"In less than an hour, aircraft from here will join others from around the world, and you will be launching the largest aerial battle in the history of mankind... Mankind. That word should have new meaning for all of us today. We can't be consumed by our petty differences anymore. We will be united in our common interests. Perhaps it's fate th ...[text shortened]... t a fight! We're going to live on! We're going to survive! Today we celebrate our Independence Day!"
@AverageJoe1 saidDo you think a good leader divides or unites?
Don't know of Pullman, but seems like he would have said, we will need an effective strong leader. We shall prevail!!!!!
2 edits
@wildgrass saidToo general a question. Maybe a group has to first be divided, to register respective concerns, maybe 11 factions, to get to a point where they can then all be united with similar policies.
Do you think a good leader divides or unites?
@AverageJoe1 saidWhy do you think that? Are there any historical examples where a good leader purposefully chooses division as a strategy for unity? It seems bonkers.
Too general a question. Maybe a group has to first be divided, to register respective concerns, maybe 11 factions, to get to a point where they can then all be united with similar policies.
@wildgrass saidI don’t know. Who but a history nut could know that, should make for good study. Something you are familiar with, or are you just hypothecating?
Why do you think that? Are there any historical examples where a good leader purposefully chooses division as a strategy for unity? It seems bonkers.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidMy feeling is that historical examples of good leaders are uniters not dividers. You just made up the idea of the opposite, or does that derive from somewhere?
I don’t know. Who but a history nut could know that, should make for good study. Something you are familiar with, or are you just hypothecating?