@sonhouse saidYou are right. Let's do something. Let's get a bus to DC, I will pay fo r it, and we will expose the Trump Presidency and bring him down....reverse all that he has done, which is all no good. We will ask Kamala what her policies are and follow her thinking. We will love all People, we will call it the Shavixmir Accord, and we will erase our boundaries. Is this about right, or, what would you think we should do if we can pull it off.? Should we have killed Solomani? Of course not, but we have to get people to listen to us!!!
Tell me. WHO IS THE FKING PRESIDENT RIGHT NOW?
WHO just had a POLITICAL powwow in the WH with the head of FBI and the AG?
That would be impeachable offense if it had been 20 years ago AND a dem in office. Now with Trump, corruption is the new normal.
You don't have the balls to even get CLOSE to seeing it because you are blinded by the wonderfulness of your lord Trump.
@AverageJoe1 saidWhat charged of corruption were there against Clinton talking to Lynch. eh? Exactly who would do those charges? the Attorney general? The FBI? Get frigging real.
But, but, but, but , but, but, but , there are no charges of corruption...except by you, little feller. Uhhh, why would I read your post? We've had had this discussion,, you just don't listen!!!
@AverageJoe1 saidStop with the sarcasm. You are clearly on board with AG and FBI now being Trump's bitch.
You are right. Let's do something. Let's get a bus to DC, I will pay fo r it, and we will expose the Trump Presidency and bring him down....reverse all that he has done, which is all no good. We will ask Kamala what her policies are and follow her thinking. We will love all People, we will call it the Shavixmir Accord, and we will erase our boundaries. Is this about r ...[text shortened]... off.? Should we have killed Solomani? Of course not, but we have to get people to listen to us!!!
@AverageJoe1 saidYou can't see corruption if it stains the end of your nose.
You are so comfortable in the past. Get your feet wet, man.
I was using the Clinton affair as an EXAMPLE of why it is a no no for FBI or AG to be colluding with the WH and here they are actually LITERALLY in the WH talking POLITICS with Vance and you are either so STUPID you cannot understand why this is corruption or you know full well just what it is and are just as complicit in the whole corruption era we are in now. Take your pick.
1 edit
@sonhouse saidColluding with WH? If you will, please set Trump aside for a moment. These five people have evidence against them for a conspiracy, which has been referred to as treason, given that it was to upset the nature of the United States of America. Do you follow me so far?
You can't see corruption if it stains the end of your nose.
I was using the Clinton affair as an EXAMPLE of why it is a no no for FBI or AG to be colluding with the WH and here they are actually LITERALLY in the WH talking POLITICS with Vance and you are either so STUPID you cannot understand why this is corruption or you know full well just what it is and are just as complicit in the whole corruption era we are in now. Take your pick.
So, Patel‘s FBI sees fit to investigate these people. This has nothing to do with Trump, it has everything to do with Patel and with these people. If you could whistle your posts down to that concise premise , someone may enjoy reading your posts. If you ramble on about Trump, no one will enjoy reading your posts.
@AverageJoe1 saidI didn't mention Trump here. I SAID it was the head of FBI and AG in CULLOSION with Vance IN THE WH making POLITICAL decisions which is NOT how it is supposed to be done.
Colluding with WH? If you will, please set Trump aside for a moment. These five people have evidence against them for a conspiracy, which has been referred to as treason, given that it was to upset the nature of the United States of America. Do you follow me so far?
So, Patel‘s FBI sees fit to investigate these people. This has nothing to do with Trump, it has everyt ...[text shortened]... ne may enjoy reading your posts. If you ramble on about Trump, no one will enjoy reading your posts.
What don't you understand about FBI and AG being totally and I mean TOTALLY independent from the WH?
Those agencies are not there to be a pawn for Trump.
They are supposed to look at FACTS of cases, LAW, DUE Process and the like. NOT what does Trump want us to attack this time which is EXACTLY what that meeting was. First to limit political damage to Trump if and when the full Epstein files are let out to the public and second to make a hit list of those to be fired BECAUSE they worked on the Jan 6 insurrection investigation and others.
THAT IS CORRUPTION. But of course you will never get that.
@sonhouse saidEpstein, Jan 6, yeah yeah. Let us resolve those two matters so we won't have to write about them anymore. I wish I would have thought of that before.
I didn't mention Trump here. I SAID it was the head of FBI and AG in CULLOSION with Vance IN THE WH making POLITICAL decisions which is NOT how it is supposed to be done.
What don't you understand about FBI and AG being totally and I mean TOTALLY independent from the WH?
Those agencies are not there to be a pawn for Trump.
They are supposed to look at FACTS of cases, LAW, ...[text shortened]... 6 insurrection investigation and others.
THAT IS CORRUPTION. But of course you will never get that.
I have always wondered how you know what goes on behind closed doors in the White House, and how you know so much about the inner workings and what people's conversations about and why they do what they do or say what they do. Also, you always know what certain people are thinking, and you know what the decisions are made based on politics or on something else. Amazing.
@AverageJoe1 saidIt is not about not writing about it anymore, it is about KEEPING TRUMPS NAME OUT OF THE FILES. That is ALL it is about.
Epstein, Jan 6, yeah yeah. Let us resolve those two matters so we won't have to write about them anymore. I wish I would have thought of that before.
I have always wondered how you know what goes on behind closed doors in the White House, and how you know so much about the inner workings and what people's conversations about and why they do what they do or say wh ...[text shortened]... thinking, and you know what the decisions are made based on politics or on something else. Amazing.
If and when the files are released you can bet your ass Trump's name will be redacted but by god, Clinton will be there and any other Dem. No repubs will be in that list when Trumps bitch FBI gets through with it.
@sonhouse saidEpstein again, Jesus. OK I'll play. Let's say his name is there and he was cuddling with two 14-year-olds on the video. Tell us what you think should happen if we saw a video like that cut and dry. No trial required. no one disavowing it or calling it a fake. Slam dunk.
It is not about not writing about it anymore, it is about KEEPING TRUMPS NAME OUT OF THE FILES. That is ALL it is about.
If and when the files are released you can bet your ass Trump's name will be redacted but by god, Clinton will be there and any other Dem. No repubs will be in that list when Trumps bitch FBI gets through with it.
So, tell us what do you think should happen then thank you very much. After you answer, please allow me a follow up question thank you very much again.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou fking miss the point. It is not JUST about Trump. it is about DOJ and FBI being Trump's bitch. They do what he says and that is a BIG no no.
Epstein again, Jesus. OK I'll play. Let's say his name is there and he was cuddling with two 14-year-olds on the video. Tell us what you think should happen if we saw a video like that cut and dry. No trial required. no one disavowing it or calling it a fake. Slam dunk.
So, tell us what do you think should happen then thank you very much. After you answer, please allow me a follow up question thank you very much again.
Did you ever hear about the idea of DOJ and FBI being INDEPENDENT from POTUS?
@sonhouse saidI dont miss the point. See this copy of what you wrote above, the point...
You fking miss the point. It is not JUST about Trump. it is about DOJ and FBI being Trump's bitch. They do what he says and that is a BIG no no.
Did you ever hear about the idea of DOJ and FBI being INDEPENDENT from POTUS?
""It is not about not writing about it anymore, it is about KEEPING TRUMPS NAME OUT OF THE FILES. That is ALL it is about."" Jesus. You said that, and then here you say, ...."IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT TRUMP>". Jesus. A total reverse in 2 sentences. Jesus.
So I dammit respond. Do you think I can respond to all of your sentences??? So I pick this one, and I asked you politely, not missing the point. You say they will keep his name out. I ask that if they do NOT keep his name out, just what do you want to happen when they discover a horrible video of Trump???? That is all I ask you here, and it is dammit in response to your post that they may remove his name from a list. Jesus. You still wont answer, will you.
Instead of ranting, I go straight to what you are talking about. Trump's name being
@AverageJoe1 saidAnd you see nothing wrong with AG, head of FBI and Vance IN THE WH discussing ANYTHING do you.'
I dont miss the point. See this copy of what you wrote above, the point...
""It is not about not writing about it anymore, it is about KEEPING TRUMPS NAME OUT OF THE FILES. That is ALL it is about."" Jesus. You said that, and then here you say, ...."IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT TRUMP>". Jesus. A total reverse in 2 sentences. Jesus.
So I dammit respond. Do you think I ...[text shortened]... ll you.
Instead of ranting, I go straight to what you are talking about. Trump's name being
Do you understand ANYTHING about the fact they are supposed to be independent of control by the WH?
I think you know that full well and cannot bring yourself around to even admitting THAT part of it and they were not JUST talking about Trump they were discussing plans on what FBI agents to fire for daring to have had their bosses tell them to investigate the Jan 6 case.
So the next day the latest round of firings started, but there were already hundreds of firings of agents just because they were involved in investigations into Jan 6.
@sonhouse saidYeah, it's Stalinism American style. Different language, different targets, same thing. Nothing to do with our Constitution. So much for that experiment. Bunch of power-mad cowards cowed.
And you see nothing wrong with AG, head of FBI and Vance IN THE WH discussing ANYTHING do you.'
Do you understand ANYTHING about the fact they are supposed to be independent of control by the WH?
I think you know that full well and cannot bring yourself around to even admitting THAT part of it and they were not JUST talking about Trump they were discussing plans on what F ...[text shortened]... already hundreds of firings of agents just because they were involved in investigations into Jan 6.
"This is not America"