4 edits
@Sleepyguy saidDurham reviewed all that already, and, again, his investigation was itself redundant with what Trump's inspector general investigated prior to that (it was way back in 2017). So from 2016 until 2023 there was constant investigations on this topic from hand selected Trump appointed people. The only thing he wouldn't have had access to was what was never documented, but tulsi can't get that either without subpoenas and more interviews and years more 'we will see in 2 weeks' stuff.
I don't see how you can say it has been thoroughly investigated when Gabbard is producing hundreds of previously classified documents. She has the power to reach into all the silos, and give it all to a willing DOJ that will hopefully now be able to expose the giant lie.
Tulsi is running a media attention deflection operation, nothing more. None of what she produced is revealing anything, Durham allready reviewed it. Many argued that is what Durham was doing too.
There's no denying that experienced attorney John Durham tried really really hard for years to find dirt on Obama and came up empty. Now, NOW, you're saying the magic evidence appears to tulsi gabbard? Riiiight. I don't buy it.
@AverageJoe1 saidRebuilt the military. RIIIGHT. You mean the part where the "beautiful' bill added some 170 BILLION to fund ICE which BTW is greater than the entire military budget for the Marine Corps. I guess we don't need that much protection from outside forces since the whole world is SO peaceful now and there are no enemies in sight, right?
FIRST: President Trump, in just 6 months........
He has rebuilt military. Modernized our military. All recruitment goals have been met. He has restored standing on the world stage. Brought back peace through strength (faeries do not like the 'strength' word), obliterated Iran's nuclear program, to end the war between Israel and Iran (you prob forgot that one), he he has ...[text shortened]... ere an express intent to carry on a coup over one year. There is a really really big word for that.
@wildgrass saidYou have not heard her apparently. Gotthe goods. O will pro skate, but about 4 of his co-conspirators are lawyeringup.
Durham reviewed all that already, and, again, his investigation was itself redundant with what Trump's inspector general investigated prior to that (it was way back in 2017). So from 2016 until 2023 there was constant investigations on this topic from hand selected Trump appointed people. The only thing he wouldn't have had access to was what was never documented, but tulsi ...[text shortened]... mpty. Now, NOW, you're saying the magic evidence appears to tulsi gabbard? Riiiight. I don't buy it.
If you accuse me of stealing money from the church, of course I didn’t,and SHOW no signs of ever having done so! Why would Iawyer up?
2 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidNice try smaller than average joe boy but it won't work. Release the Epstein files. Everyone knows that Russia interferes in almost every election around the world.
You have not heard her apparently. Gotthe goods. O will pro skate, but about 4 of his co-conspirators are lawyeringup.
If you accuse me of stealing money from the church, of course I didn’t,and SHOW no signs of ever having done so! Why would Iawyer up?
THE EPSTEIN FILES!!!
Your Child molester and thief is going down smaller than average Joe boy; just as Richard Nixon.
Trump is nothing but a disgrace, and he always has been.
@KingDavid403 saidThey knew they had to release something so they said let's just release al the stuff we already investigated twice and that'll appease the people who want to see the Epstein clients prosecuted.
Nice try smaller than average joe boy but it won't work. Release the Epstein files. Everyone knows that Russia interferes in almost every election around the world.
THE EPSTEIN FILES!!!
@wildgrass saidThat's what I think the did, and the reason they did it.
They knew they had to release something so they said let's just release al the stuff we already investigated twice and that'll appease the people who want to see the Epstein clients prosecuted.
1 edit
@wildgrass saidI agree 100%. Then trump says he well release the grand jury testimony in the Epstein case knowing full-well that would be illegal for the Federal Judge to do.
They knew they had to release something so they said let's just release al the stuff we already investigated twice and that'll appease the people who want to see the Epstein clients prosecuted.
Trump thinks he's smart but he is an idiot threw and threw.
@spruce112358 saidAG Bondi already has advised Trump that he is mentioned in those Epstein files.
@AverageJoe1
Yes. It really does appear that the Epstein thing is NOT going away. 😆 😆 😆
I see that Trump and Epstein were the closest of friends and had little “secrets?” Normally that would be of no interest, but Epstein was a notorious criminal.
We should look at the files and see if Trump is mentioned in there in any way. 😆
But it sure did not stop Trump from ordering the files to be released. He's not worried.
But Biden, on the other hand, had the Epstein files for 4 years and he did not release those files to the public.
Biden could have kept Trump from getting elected. What's WRONG with that guy?
You do the math.
I get - important democrats are far more worried than Donald Trump. What do you get 😏
@Sleepyguy saidThanks. I have a lot of opinions about the importance of info siloing as it pertains to individual privacy. Maybe a new thread entirely. But as it pertains to this thread, the thesis of your article suggests that John Durham did not have access to the files that tulsi gabbard just released. As far as I know this is incorrect. He went out of his way to say that he was granted access to every document he needed to make a firm conclusion. Am I wrong?
@wildgrass
Read this with an open mind?
https://tinyurl.com/4uzrjm4k
@AverageJoe1 saiddumbass it was sarcasm
Hey, did not you libs go haywire when SCOTUS considered Trump gets immunity???!? Hypocrites, Hypocrites!!!
and, S of limitations may figure in, unless treason by Obama is found.
ofc it was a bad thing
@AverageJoe1 said"we will own the elections for some time"
None of that crowd, the Obamagate, Comey, Brennon, Clapper, hillary, etc will ever go to jail. No one that is not a hardened criminal will ever go to jail. That is not the point.
But, instead, to unearth what we all think is in there, which is just enough to pull a few people out of the dem party, and we will own the elections for some time.
If biden can open o ...[text shortened]... ose all of this travesity to get who is left!!!
Catch up, Z, we have been on that for some time.
which is what freedom is all about. one party owning the elections
@Earl-of-Trumps saidWait where did he order the document release?
AG Bondi already has advised Trump that he is mentioned in those Epstein files.
But it sure did not stop Trump from ordering the files to be released. He's not worried.
But Biden, on the other hand, had the Epstein files for 4 years and he did not release those files to the public.
Biden could have kept Trump from getting elected. What's WRONG with that guy?
Yo ...[text shortened]... the math.
I get - important democrats are far more worried than Donald Trump. What do you get 😏
I actually don't care if the docs are public or private. The big travesty is not prosecuting the human traffickers and abusers.
@wildgrass said"where" or did you mean "when" ?
Wait where did he order the document release?
I actually don't care if the docs are public or private. The big travesty is not prosecuting the human traffickers and abusers.
About 3 days after AG Bondi said that were no Epstein files, President Trump directed Bondi to release the files.
Buy from I think I heard on the radio, the judge refused to open the files up.
Democrat judge, I'm sure 😉
@Earl-of-Trumps saidYou swallowing Trump BS again. All the administration did was ask to release Grand Jury testimony, not all the investigative files in possession of the DOJ (which is what Trump promised to release).
"where" or did you mean "when" ?
About 3 days after AG Bondi said that were no Epstein files, President Trump directed Bondi to release the files.
Buy from I think I heard on the radio, the judge refused to open the files up.
Democrat judge, I'm sure 😉