You often try to cast negative light on Fox, like that it is too conservative, but one of their top hosts has reportedly been let go for BEING TOO FRIENDLY with Trump!!!
So, they are not so biased,,,,,,firing a real strong conservative.
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/maria-bartiromos-lawyer-says-was-not-fired-fox-news-rcna596127
This renders all your negative comments about FOX NEWS Fake News, esp by suzianne, to be meaningless. They actually considered the host to be too friendly with Trump!!!! And TDS shines in your hearts!
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, they considered her sharing information from in-house memos with the Administration to be a breach of her employment contract, which it was.
You often try to cast negative light on Fox, like that it is too conservative, but one of their top hosts has reportedly been let go for BEING TOO FRIENDLY with Trump!!!
So, they are not so biased,,,,,,firing a real strong conservative.
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/maria-bartiromos-lawyer-says-was-not-fired-fox-news-rcna596127
This renders all your nega ...[text shortened]... They actually considered the host to be too friendly with Trump!!!! And TDS shines in your hearts!
The network remains a right wing propaganda outlet.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidSo CNN is rabid liberal. your point? FOX is simply shown to have done the right thing, regardless of political leaning.
No, they considered her sharing information from in-house memos with the Administration to be a breach of her employment contract, which it was.
The network remains a right wing propaganda outlet.
Are you aware that ,like you, as I was writing about how Mangione premeditatedly murdered a man in cold blood, in the back, MB responded about some issue of an insurance company, a place where the man worked.? Let's say I had done that to a guy who made me a bad sandwich at McDonalds... Would you and MB discuss that McDonalds had something to do with it, or that I had killed a man in coid blood. Y'all are just pitiful llibs with nothing to get a grip on.
As an aside, should Mangione be executed. Tomorrow?
MB seems to think we should go easy on him due to some gripe he had with the company that the man worked for.
You will not give me a straight up answer...Or, tell me that MB is a loser.
INSURANCE COMPANY!!!!??? Jesus
@AverageJoe1 saidYou're off-topic in your own thread (odd) BUT:
Oh, i know about all his rights and plea deals..Please, don't waste ink on that.
Here I gko again, I know you just hate it and it taxes you to find a way to dodge and deflect......
DO YOU THINK HE SHOULD EXECUTED?!
A real brain teaser.
Ask me a question.
I don't believe the State should have the power to execute anyone. History shows they invariably abuse it.
@no1marauder saidFirst I sincerely apologize , off topic. But being floored by the MB’s mangione comments, I thought you should know what he is about. Then, that led me to asking what YOU think, should Mangine die for his act.
You're off-topic in your own thread (odd) BUT:
I don't believe the State should have the power to execute anyone. History shows they invariably abuse it.
Funny thing, MB answer referenced insurance, and YOUR answer referenced ‘the State’
To you both: the question was what YOU think in each respective case.
Pitiful . Why can’t you get it?
@AverageJoe1 saidI already answered.
If I murder your uncle in the back as he strolls along a sidewalk, should ‘The State’ execute me?
@no1marauder saidDon’t make start a thread on this, O ye who will not answer. That corner you find yourself in…..it can get cramped. It will be a one sentence post, I will not mention your name
I already answered.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidWhy do you always play this stupid game?
Don’t make start a thread on this, O ye who will not answer. That corner you find yourself in…..it can get cramped. It will be a one sentence post, I will not mention your name
I gave an answer to your question, you don't like the answer, so you say I didn't answer. Changing the identity of the victim doesn't change my answer.
It's ridiculous and childish.
@no1marauder saidYou certainly did not. You are playing a contracts professor who shifts between shifting and springing executory interests to fool his students. Won't work here. Everyone wants to know your simple answer (nothing about the State or insurance) to my question.
Why do you always play this stupid game?
I gave an answer to your question, you don't like the answer, so you say I didn't answer. Changing the identity of the victim doesn't change my answer.
It's ridiculous and childish.
Your uncle walks on a sidewalk, I appear behind him and murder him in the back with a silencered pistol. Would you demand the death penalty for me??
No fluff, please, yes or no.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, you idiot.
You certainly did not. You are playing a contracts professor who shifts between shifting and springing executory interests to fool his students. Won't work here. Everyone wants to know your simple answer (nothing about the State or insurance) to my question.
Your uncle walks on a sidewalk, I appear behind him and murder him in the back with a silencered pistol. Would you demand the death penalty for me??
No fluff, please, yes or no.
When I said the State shouldn't have the power to execute anyone, I meant it.
@no1marauder saidI did not ask about the process or procedure of the State
No, you idiot.
When I said the State shouldn't have the power to execute anyone, I meant it.
Would you want me to be executed for shooting your uncle in the back.?
I can ask you an easier question to work into this question if you would like.