20 Jun '18 22:21>
We were all duped into opening this thread anyway. I thought it was about Trump's underground tunnels or something. I guess we can just add the thread title to the growing list of No1's dishonest ploys.
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyNo you missed the whole point.
Essentially you are saying this:
It's fine that Obama caged children, because they weren't apprehended along with adults who allege to be their parents. It's child abuse if Trump does the same thing, solely for the reason that the children were apprehended along with people who allege to be their parents.
Originally posted by @mghrn55kids in cages...Obama had a good reason...got it!
No you missed the whole point.
Under Obama's watch carried out their duties under the rule of law.
NOT under orders from the White House !!
Now the president would have to take some heat over by ICE being over zealous.
But the previous administration did not issue those orders.
This administration escalated the use of the laws in place ??
For poli ...[text shortened]...
While I know you will say "what's the difference ??"
There is a big difference.
Capiche ???
Originally posted by @no1marauderand the trafficing continues.
Or:
It's worse to separate children from their parents then detain unaccompanied children.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleTrump got it better.
kids in cages...Obama had a good reason...got it!
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleBecause this administration is incompetent !!
and the trafficing continues.
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyDo you agree with Ann Coulter that these children, especially the ones recorded screaming and crying on audio and video, are "crisis actors"?
Nope. Sorry. It's a fact. The "guardians" shall we say, often cannot be proven to be the parents of the children.
Anyway, the talking point is done, the executive order was signed because Congress wouldn't act, and now you can move on to the next talking point. You should continue to concentrate your faux outrage on matters that involve children ...[text shortened]... ver crimes committed 12 years ago doesn't seem to have worked. Oh well. You'll find something.
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyMothers and daughters are needlessly victimized and traumatized by Donald J Trump and his stupid policy and we're now supposed to feel sorry for Trump?? Yeah, I'm all choked up (NOT!) 😞
"Trump Caves"
So... you find it necessary to insult him (which the NY Times didn't), even when he takes measures to fix what you complain about. Says a lot about you. And your lack of virtue.
Originally posted by @mghrn55The White House is supposed to carry out the law numb nuts.
No you missed the whole point.
Under Obama's watch ICE carried out their duties under the rule of law.
NOT under orders from the White House !!
Now the president would have to take some heat over by ICE being over zealous.
But the previous administration did not issue those orders.
This administration escalated the use of the laws in place ??
For ...[text shortened]...
While I know you will say "what's the difference ??"
There is a big difference.
Capiche ???
Originally posted by @tom-wolseyHis caving in was the result of heavy political pressure from his own party and does nothing to help the thousands of children already in intern camps.
"Trump Caves"
So... you find it necessary to insult him (which the NY Times didn't), even when he takes measures to fix what you complain about. Says a lot about you. And your lack of virtue.
Originally posted by @deepthoughtTrump's decisions are informed by only two (2) considerations: self-aggrandizement and the belittlement of others. The only scenario in which I could envision applauding Trump is if he were to bounce at least three times when falling down a flight of stairs.
I've been thinking about this, one might give recognition that he didn't dig his feet in for any longer, but I'm not sure a round of applause is in order either. I'm left wondering about the timing however. The US has just withdrawn from UNHRC and apparently not because the last three letters are the same as the initials of his Democratic Party rival ...[text shortened]... s is to fend off international criticism aimed at undermining the credibility of the UNHRC move.
Originally posted by @eladarEver hear of 'executive prerogative', numbnuts?
The White House is supposed to carry out the law numb nuts.
Originally posted by @suzianneNo. Although at least one of the crying children on video was, in fact, a hoax. The child was legitimately crying, but the context of it was completely made up. The child was at a protest behind a fake cage that was used as a prop in the protest.
Do you agree with Ann Coulter that these children, especially the ones recorded screaming and crying on audio and video, are "crisis actors"?
Originally posted by @sonhouseYep, there you have it folks. The mob screams bloody murder in a full rage... then Trump takes action since Congress wouldn't... and you condemn him for it. What you're actually mad about is, with the stroke of a pen, he removed this talking point from your arsenal.
Trump did NOTHING.