Go back
Trump invades DC

Trump invades DC

Debates


@shavixmir said
You mean trump lying through his teeth by sending 4 shifts of national guard to DC to stand alongside thousands of policemen?

The numbers aren’t doctored, numb nuts. They’re your official figures.
That you don’t like the truth is neither here, not there.

Well, other than you’re being taken for a ride and do not contemplate it.
rage on lunatic

https://thepostmillennial.com/dc-police-commander-placed-on-leave-over-deliberately-falsifying-crime-data


@shavixmir said
Crime was down in most major US cities by 25% or more last year. Indeed, murder dropped even more.

In the republican states, the murder rates went up last year.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/murder-rate-by-state

Read it and weep. Look at the states with the highest murder rates. They don’t look very democratic to me…

One can only wonder where the hell you’re getting so indictrinated…
"indictrinated"

illiterate fool


@wildgrass said
Are you surprised at all that they deployed 1450 soldiers and only found 29 people to arrest ?
how many people does it take to kill you?


@wildgrass said
Are you surprised at all that they deployed 1450 soldiers and only found 29 people to arrest ?
Your logic, or the lack there of, does not make sense, and that our authorities surmise that it would take 1450 people. You will have to check on them as to why that number.
But, You’re saying this has nothing to do with the fact that 23 criminals (and maybe some suspects who werenot who were found to not be criminal, but we’re in the wrong place at the wrong time) …. 23 criminals would not have been caught. Have they not been there.

And tell me this, do liberals have a problem when someone might be accidentally picked up, that is hanging on the same street corner as an illegal alien? Do you find that reprehensible or possible? What do you find that? Being argumentative does not bode well in debates by the way. You see I predict right now neither I know anyone I know will ever be picked up by accident on some street corner or wherever these people are. If I’m attending a high school football game on Saturday or walking into church on Sunday, and an illegal is there when they pick him up they will not pick me up.


@Mott-The-Hoople said
how many people does it take to kill you?
Is that a threat?


@AverageJoe1 said
Your logic, or the lack there of, does not make sense, and that our authorities surmise that it would take 1450 people. You will have to check on them as to why that number.
But, You’re saying this has nothing to do with the fact that 23 criminals (and maybe some suspects who werenot who were found to not be criminal, but we’re in the wrong place at the wrong time) … ...[text shortened]... lking into church on Sunday, and an illegal is there when they pick him up they will not pick me up.
The subway sandwich tosser I assume is on that list of criminals that they arrested but ironically he would not have committed a crime if they were not there.


@wildgrass said
Is that a threat?
I doubt it. It's just another example of his moronic posts that he is famous for.


@wildgrass said
The subway sandwich tosser I assume is on that list of criminals that they arrested but ironically he would not have committed a crime if they were not there.
Wild grass officially loses it. He is saying that the sandwich thrower was justified for the simple reason that the policeman was there. That is what he is saying. Like it is the policeman‘s fault for having Ben there. I think that is what he is saying. I think he is saying this whole altercation was the fault of the policeman……. Who was there to protect your granny while she was trying to get into a store that was mobbed by thieves wearing masks., also trying to get into that very store. Sure is confusing, isn’t it. I’ll recommend applying the logic of wild grass. You really are floundering. Join the ranks of the forum morons.
Why is there no emoji for moron? It must be a liberal touchy thing that it might be offensive.?


@AverageJoe1 said
Wild grass officially loses it. He is saying that the sandwich thrower was justified for the simple reason that the policeman was there. That is what he is saying. Like it is the policeman‘s fault for having Ben there. I think that is what he is saying. I think he is saying this whole altercation was the fault of the policeman……. Who was there to protect your granny while ...[text shortened]... ns.
Why is there no emoji for moron? It must be a liberal touchy thing that it might be offensive.?
No not what I said.... It's not the policeman's fault at all, but the policeman's absence would have prevented the crime from occurring.

You see the difference? In a police state obedience to government is more important than criminal enforcement.


He would have rather eaten the sandwich himself than throw it at the soldier right?

Fight fascism with sandwiches. This could be a new as campaign for Subway.


@wildgrass said
No not what I said.... It's not the policeman's fault at all, but the policeman's absence would have prevented the crime from occurring.

You see the difference? In a police state obedience to government is more important than criminal enforcement.
Now he says that IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IMPOSSIBLE for that crime to have occurred, or been committed, if the cop had not been there๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜—๐Ÿ›ต๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค”.

Thank you, Wildgrass, a great example for our readers to see what not to do when losing a conversation, to change over and write silly stuff.


@wildgrass said
Is that a threat?
If I threaten you , you will know it ๐Ÿ˜‚ skeert fboy

Vote Up
1
Vote Down


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Oh YEAH!?

https://m.


Throwing a sandwich at a cop: felony

Beating a cop unconscious with a flagpole: tourism