@no1marauder saidThe reason Mrchan, whose daughter has made millions on this trial (look it up), will not declare is because, simply , he is one of you.
I rate that possibility as low. Trump is facing 34 separate and distinct counts, all of which must be decided by the jury unless the judge dismisses some after closing arguments (I rate it as a possibility that some of the ones based on false ledger accounts might be so dismissed but regard it as almost certain the ones involving signed checks and Cohen's invoices will go ...[text shortened]... send them back for further deliberations.
I expect a resolution by verdict one way or the other.
He is Sonhouse in a black robe.
@spruce112358
This was reported by a talking head inside the courtroom and I heard this on MSNBC, but no idea of the identity of the jurist, they did not give out names to keep them safe, Trump has henchmen who WOULD attack them if they could find them.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou never quit with the Republican fairy tales, do you?
The reason Mrchan, whose daughter has made millions on this trial (look it up), will not declare is because, simply , he is one of you.
He is Sonhouse in a black robe.
@AverageJoe1 saidIt's far from unusual for the members of a judge's family to have some involvement in partisan politics.
The reason Mrchan, whose daughter has made millions on this trial (look it up), will not declare is because, simply , he is one of you.
He is Sonhouse in a black robe.
That is insufficient legal reason for such an extraordinary remedy as recusal.
@shavixmir saidThis will be the problem jurors have. At least you DO know that a particular crime was never alleged.
I can't even follow what the hell it's all about.
Are they questioning trump sleeping with Stormy?
Or is it the payment of hush money they're denying?
Or is is that the hush money came from an election trust (or something) which they claim is false?
Is it all three?
Didn't we know 8 years ago that trump was sleeping with a porn star?? I seem to recall that som ...[text shortened]... rruption, mishandeling of finances which is at the centre of this trial, but I really can't be sure.
Even a layman knows that there are numerous factors which will have the appeal reverse everything.
@shavixmir saidMcHill is going to apprise us iof a ‘mountain of evidence “ I think first thing tomorrow. Since we’ve heard nothing of substance yet from any credible witnesses , it will be some new stuff.
I can't even follow what the hell it's all about.
Are they questioning trump sleeping with Stormy?
Or is it the payment of hush money they're denying?
Or is is that the hush money came from an election trust (or something) which they claim is false?
Is it all three?
Didn't we know 8 years ago that trump was sleeping with a porn star?? I seem to recall that som ...[text shortened]... rruption, mishandeling of finances which is at the centre of this trial, but I really can't be sure.
@AverageJoe1 saidUh, you do realise that trump fvcked that porn star, did pay hush money and racked it up as election costs, don’t you?
McHill is going to apprise us iof a ‘mountain of evidence “ I think first thing tomorrow. Since we’ve heard nothing of substance yet from any credible witnesses , it will be some new stuff.
@shavixmir saidAnd hurt who?
Uh, you do realise that trump fvcked that porn star, did pay hush money and racked it up as election costs, don’t you?
@AverageJoe1 saidReally?
And hurt who?
Stealing or abusing political party funds is acceptable, because nobody's leg was broken? Is that the level of your comprehension?
Sweet Christ almighty. It's like shouting into a sink hole.
@shavixmir saidShould I mention what Biden is doing with the funds that I have put into the treasury through my taxes? I know you do not agree with me, but he is definitely abusing the funds, stealing the funds, to make himself look good to all of these loser college graduates by paying off their tuition loans. Give me a break man.
Really?
Stealing or abusing political party funds is acceptable, because nobody's leg was broken? Is that the level of your comprehension?
Sweet Christ almighty. It's like shouting into a sink hole.
@shavixmir saidthere is no crime, no evidence of a crime has been shown.
I can't even follow what the hell it's all about.
Are they questioning trump sleeping with Stormy?
Or is it the payment of hush money they're denying?
Or is is that the hush money came from an election trust (or something) which they claim is false?
Is it all three?
Didn't we know 8 years ago that trump was sleeping with a porn star?? I seem to recall that som ...[text shortened]... rruption, mishandeling of finances which is at the centre of this trial, but I really can't be sure.
its just democrat lawfare abusing the justice system
it is however backfiring on them
too many people have been mistreated by the law and can relate to what is going on…yo