Video in the link:
https://www.newsweek.com/millers-white-life-flub-follows-cornyn-tweet-attacked-pro-segregation-1719263
Republican Mary Miller thanked Trump in front of a crowd of thousands for the "victory for white life in the Supreme Court".
A slip of the tongue you say? Last year, Jan 4th (yes, two days before the insurrection) Mary Miller was at a rally called "Save the Republic" and quoted Adolf Hitler:
"Hitler was right on one thing. He said, 'Whoever has the youth has the future.' Our children are being propagandized....This is the battle".
This comes just days after Republican Senator for Texas, John Cornyn, replied to a tweet from Obama criticizing the overturn of Roe v. Wade. Coryn responded to Obama by saying "Now do Plessy vs Ferguson/Brown vs Board of Education."
Those were both SCOTUS decisions about racial segregation.
@vivify saidIf Obama is criticizing the overturn of Roe v. Wade as bad because it reverses precedent, then to be consistent, he would also have a problem with Brown v. Board of Education. Sounds to me like Coryn was pointing out that Obama should be consistent. It seems obvious he is not calling to reverse Brown v. Board of Education, but using the fact that no one would support it's reversal to support the premise that reversals can be good.
Video in the link:
https://www.newsweek.com/millers-white-life-flub-follows-cornyn-tweet-attacked-pro-segregation-1719263
Republican Mary Miller thanked Trump in front of a crowd of thousands for the "victory for white life in the Supreme Court".
A slip of the tongue you say? Last year, Jan 4th (yes, two days before the insurrection) Mary Miller was at a rally call ...[text shortened]... Ferguson/Brown vs Board of Education."
Those were both SCOTUS decisions about racial segregation.
If you can't even see the logic of that, you have not demonstrated enough intelligence to have any credibility.
@techsouth saidObama should be "consistent" with keeping precedent, therefore Cornyn names Brown v. Board of Ed...for what?
If Obama is criticizing the overturn of Roe v. Wade as bad because it reverses precedent, then to be consistent, he would also have a problem with Brown v. Board of Education. Sounds to me like Coryn was pointing out that Obama should be consistent. It seems obvious he is not calling to reverse Brown v. Board of Education, but using the fact that no one would suppo ...[text shortened]... t even see the logic of that, you have not demonstrated enough intelligence to have any credibility.
Your post was refuted the moment you responded.
@techsouth saidRight, because we're not nice to a party of white supremacists.
Charming how leftists are the party of love and strive for unity.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@techsouth saidLove?.....Unity?....
Charming how leftists are the party of love and strive for unity.
As opposed to bigotry and and hatred?
I plead guilty.....at least we don't need 30,000
lies to try to get our point across......
The truth works for us. 😛
@jimm619 saidWell, thanks for at least standing up for me. When viviify said I was worthless, you lovingly corrected him and pointed out that as trash I at least had some value.
Love?.....Unity?....
As opposed to bigotry and and hatred?
I plead guilty.....at least we don't need 30,000
lies to try to get our point across......
The truth works for us. 😛
I'll always be indebted to you for that.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@techsouth saidA few words?....Try to expand your vocabulary....it's not difficult,
You are still unable to process a simple argument that was obvious to me in just a few words.
just a few minutes a day, I'll help you if you need assistance.
@techsouth saidI’m a leftie. I’d have you lot lined up and shot for just breathing.
Charming how leftists are the party of love and strive for unity.
I have no idea where your idea of “love” comes from.
If you’ve got a plague of wasps, you externinate them.