Trump's real crime

@metal-brain said
In other words, no. You have not read the indictment.
Polly want a cracker?

Need another run through an English primer?

@metal-brain said
4 out of 5 of us. Is this news to you?

https://www.dailywire.com/news/nearly-8-in-10-americans-believe-u-s-has-a-two-tiered-justice-system-survey

Yes, white people and then people of color.

This is news to you?

@suzianne said
Yes, white people and then people of color.

This is news to you?

4 out of 5 of us know better than you

@mott-the-hoople said
yes, and it is you libs

Uh oh. Now we have senator Ron Johnson saying the Biden tapes may not exist in reality. That's a lot of Republicans throwing cold water on hyped up " evidence" of Biden misconduct that no one saw or heard.

@wildgrass said
Uh oh. Now we have senator Ron Johnson saying the Biden tapes may not exist in reality. That's a lot of Republicans throwing cold water on hyped up " evidence" of Biden misconduct that no one saw or heard.

also known as state run media running cover

@mott-the-hoople said
also known as state run media running cover

The corrupt media corrupting the corrupt republican RINO and - somehow - mott you know the truth. Good job. Thanks. The call is coming from outside the house.

@metal-brain said
4 out of 5 of us know better than you

You mean the 4 out of 5 who are white? Apparently not.

@mott-the-hoople said
also known as state run media running cover

You really are dumber than you sound on here, aren't you? More gullible, too. Why do you insist on carrying water for a billionaire? Think he'll reward you some day? Did I mention gullible?

@wildgrass said
The corrupt media corrupting the corrupt republican RINO and - somehow - mott you know the truth. Good job. Thanks. The call is coming from outside the house.

hurts when you gat called out doesnt it?

@suzianne said
You really are dumber than you sound on here, aren't you? More gullible, too. Why do you insist on carrying water for a billionaire? Think he'll reward you some day? Did I mention gullible?

gullible is a liberal thinking dems are against billionaires…soros, gates, bezos come to mind?

@mott-the-hoople said
hurts when you gat called out doesnt it?

Nah. I'm just glad we have you to ignore evidence, sift through all the double reverse corruption, identify the truth, and then report it back to us. How do you do it, with all the state run media bs?

US Senators on the Republican side are now working for the state run media, controlled by the Dems. Meanwhile seemingly convincing evidence of corruption is planted by unnamed FBI agents for no apparent reason and the real crime was committed by the Biden's circling back on the state run media scam arguing the evidence was faked but that's just to make it look like there is no evidence.

Phew, I'm exhausted.

@wildgrass said
Nah. I'm just glad we have you to ignore evidence, sift through all the double reverse corruption, identify the truth, and then report it back to us. How do you do it, with all the state run media bs?

US Senators on the Republican side are now working for the state run media, controlled by the Dems. Meanwhile seemingly convincing evidence of corruption is planted by unna ...[text shortened]... vidence was faked but that's just to make it look like there is no evidence.

Phew, I'm exhausted.

You’re supposed to be exhausted. It’s the lizard people’s strategy to keep humans distracted. Distracted and controlled. Distracted, controlled, and compliant. Distracted, controlled, compliant, and shooting at each other instead of at lizard people. Did I mention the lizard people? Fact. True fact. Real true fact. The lack of evidence is proof how thoroughly they hide evidence.



PS Birds don’t exist. They were all replaced by spy drones in the 1990s. Even penguins. The dead ones you sometimes see on the street are decoys, cryogenically preserved from 1989.

@metal-brain said
No it isn't. If others did the same thing and didn't have to accept accountability for it why would it not be relevant?

Why don't you just admit this is a double standard of injustice and you are fine with that because you hate Trump?

The fact that others may have done the same and not (yet) been indicted is no reason not to indict Trump, now that a grand jury has seen enough prima facie evidence to bring charges.

If indictments have not (yet) been brought against others, you should just let the DoJ do its job instead of whinging about double standards.

@moonbus said
The fact that others may have done the same and not (yet) been indicted is no reason not to indict Trump, now that a grand jury has seen enough prima facie evidence to bring charges.

If indictments have not (yet) been brought against others, you should just let the DoJ do its job instead of whinging about double standards.

No! Indict the a holes who did it first. Then move on to Trump.