@KingDavid403 saidShould be just as easy for you, KING. You seem to have a lot of time to waste. Plus, you can zero in on what REALLY upsets you. Like SHOuse does.
A quote from an article:
What article liar joe?
I aint gonna search it for you. How bout you send us somethiing that Democrats are more charitable.
I didn't ask you to search it for me; you brought it up and posted it as fact; prove your supposed fact little liar joe boy before you post it as a fact.
[b]that counties which are “overwhelmingly Rep ...[text shortened]... it should be real easy for you to prove you false claims with some links, huh liar joe boy? lol...
@Suzianne saidSome people a lot more knowledgeable than you and the KING (senators committees, etc) are going to vet him on these matters this week. They may turn Trump down on this, after they agree with you!!!!! that RFK is not qualified.
Might as well put RFK Jr. in charge of the FDA.
Diff in you and me, we elected these people to make such decisions, I abide everytime with their decisions.
You angry people, no way. Get signs and storm the capitol!!
The citizens of Washington voted for Natural Gas, etc....The State is SUING to get their wishes thrown out.
Maybe Sonhouse will weigh in on this assault on Democracy. You are one of those type people, sue 'em since you don't like their votes!!!
Sue,,,,is this an assault on democracy?? By Dems?
2 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidSo you quoted from an article that you all the sudden lost; we got it liar joe boy, we got it liar.
Should be just as easy for you, KING. You seem to have a lot of time to waste. Plus, you can zero in on what REALLY upsets you. Like SHOuse does.
You seem to have a lot of time to waste.
you're the one posting lies non-stop on this site liar joe, not me. Show some reference links to back up you statements liar joe boy.
In ANY college or University you would have to reference your statements such as this; so do so liar joe.
The only way you would not have a link is if you're lying liar Joe boy. LOL...
@KingDavid403 saidCan't, wore out. Easily done with you and the suean.
A quote from an article:
What article liar joe?
I aint gonna search it for you. How bout you send us somethiing that Democrats are more charitable.
I didn't ask you to search it for me; you brought it up and posted it as fact; prove your supposed fact little liar joe boy before you post it as a fact.
[b]that counties which are “overwhelmingly Rep ...[text shortened]... it should be real easy for you to prove you false claims with some links, huh liar joe boy? lol...
It is all on the internet, many many articles. Sends us one that Dems are more charitable.
@KingDavid403 saida quick google search would have prevent you from making yourself look like a dumbass…
A quote from an article:
What article liar joe?
I aint gonna search it for you. How bout you send us somethiing that Democrats are more charitable.
I didn't ask you to search it for me; you brought it up and posted it as fact; prove your supposed fact little liar joe boy before you post it as a fact.
[b]that counties which are “overwhelmingly Rep ...[text shortened]... it should be real easy for you to prove you false claims with some links, huh liar joe boy? lol...
“Over three-quarters of US charities’ revenues come from donations by individuals, and we used these individual giving decisions to learn about differences in “apolitical” behaviour by partisans. In three surveys, we asked whether Republicans and conservatives give more or less to charity than Democrats and liberals. While political identity and giving are measured slightly differently across the surveys, the results are consistent: Republicans and conservatives report donating between $60 and $160 more per year to charity than Democrats and liberals. This result holds even when we account for socio-economic measures that are correlated both with political identity and charitable giving. The baseline difference in giving behaviour comports with what others have found: partisanship is a dividing line not only in terms of choosing candidates and policies, but also in how partisans spend their disposable income.”
https://www.democraticaudit.com/2017/11/17/republicans-give-more-to-charity-but-not-because-they-oppose-income-redistribution/
1 edit
@KingDavid403 saidThankyou, Mott. But no matter what I bring up, (like the link below that KING cannot find on his own), they will come back with , let me see....., their doghouse in the back yard, or something like that.
So you quoted from an article that you all the sudden lost; we got it liar joe boy, we got it liar.
You seem to have a lot of time to waste.
you're the one posting lies non-stop on this site liar joe, not me. Show some reference links to back up you statements liar joe boy.
In ANY college or University you would have to reference your statements such as this ...[text shortened]... so do so liar joe.
The only way you would not have a link is if you're lying liar Joe boy. LOL...
https://nonprofitquarterly.org/republicans-give-more-to-charity-than-democrats-but-theres-a-bigger-story-here/
I have no idea what is the 'bigger story', but the sentence says repubs give more. KING will dissect it all while I play 18 holes of golf, and when he writes me something that he thinks negates my point, I will gloss over it to see what is on Sue's mind this afternoon. Do you know that when we pay taxes, that she says that it is not our money? A bit more fun than KING.
I engaged her about that a while back, I asked her that if the Govt decided to cease to exist, what would theoretically happen to the money in he Treasury,,,,which would obviously be returned to us....because it is ours, unused..
She would not answer the question,,,,,,,,which is what she accuses me of in this very thread.
I could just scream.
@AverageJoe1 saidYep, you lied, liar.
Can't, wore out. Easily done with you and the suean.
It is all on the internet, many many articles. Sends us one that Dems are more charitable.
@AverageJoe1 saidNot to the extent that I own my own water supply, gas well, and electric power generation. Few do. 😆
Do you, and your friends, not have one scintilla of independence in your body or psyche
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidAwwww. poor baby. lol... We all know who the dumb ass is, except you the dumb ass.
a quick google search would have prevent you from making yourself look like a dumbass…
“Over three-quarters of US charities’ revenues come from donations by individuals, and we used these individual giving decisions to learn about differences in “apolitical” behaviour by partisans. In three surveys, we asked whether Republicans and conservatives give more or less t ...[text shortened]... t.com/2017/11/17/republicans-give-more-to-charity-but-not-because-they-oppose-income-redistribution/
People in both parties give roughly the same. It is income that creates the divide.
https://apply.surveymonkey.com/resources/partisanship-influence-charitable-giving/
1 edit
@KingDavid403 said😂
Awwww. poor baby. lol... We all know who the dumb ass is, except you the dumb ass.
People in both parties give roughly the same. It is income that creates the divide.
https://apply.surveymonkey.com/resources/partisanship-influence-charitable-giving/
per your link
Overall giving levels rise as incomes grow for both groups, but Republicans give slightly more at each income level. To offer one example, in households with an annual income under $29,000, 36% of Republicans donated $101-$1000, compared to 26% of Democrats. The trend continues in this direction across all brackets, as seen in the graphic below.
u is stoopid my man
😉
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidSo where do independents rank? Or don't they count too?
😂
per your link
Overall giving levels rise as incomes grow for both groups, but Republicans give slightly more at each income level. To offer one example, in households with an annual income under $29,000, 36% of Republicans donated $101-$1000, compared to 26% of Democrats. The trend continues in this direction across all brackets, as seen in the graphic below.
u is stoopid my man
😉
Either way, and you know it if you're honest at all; they is no damn way to honestly say which party gives the most percentage of their income; end of story. Nice try tho dumb ass.
Gee, I wonder if the author of your article is a Republican. lol... Only a Republican would say and study something so stupid; someone like little joe boy. He whines and lies like Donald jr; a little angry grade school girl.
@KingDavid403 saidI used your link 😉
So where do independents rank? Or don't they count too?
Either way, and you know it if you're honest at all; they is no damn way to honestly say which party gives the most percentage of their income; end of story. Nice try tho dumb ass.
Gee, I wonder if the author of your article is a Republican. lol... Only a Republican would say and study something so stupid; someone like little joe boy. He whines and lies like Donald jr; a little angry grade school girl.
maybe you learned something today
your hole is deep enough, quit digging
@spruce112358 saidBingo. Certain needful services should not be run like businesses, based on profit. Justice, courts, and the prison system is one example. Public transport is another. Health care is a third. As you rightly pointed out, quite a number of other countries in the world have managed to get the mix about right, providing good quality healthcare free at the point of consumption. what scares Americans away from these other systems is that Americans have a horror of socialism and think that providing healthcare free at the point of consumption is the same thing as the government telling people what operations they can have and which doctors they can go to. It’s scaremongering. It does not have to be that way.
We can be more exact: UHC is the manifestation of the problem. 😆
THE actual problem is strictly regulating a healthcare "market" to reduce competition to near zero but then refusing to regulate the resulting soar in prices.
Europe regulates both competition AND prices which turns healthcare into a public utility - which doesn't lead to much innovation, but it func ...[text shortened]... he water they use. It's bananas. But it is why we have the highest healthcare costs in the world. 😆
@AverageJoe1 saidYes. Absolutely.
Are you suggesting we go to the Single Payer system??
The healthcare crisis is entering what appears to be its final stages. The end game. Big changes will come, no doubt about it, simply because the stratospheric costs of healthcare are increasingly untenable. Obamacare was and is a bandage, a stopgap, and the only way forward is to recognize the realities that the rest of the civilized world recognized generations ago.