04 Dec '20 06:48>
@shavixmir saidWhy do you think it was so [inaudible]?
Her name is Ondick?
Denise Ondick?
Okay. Nothing funny about that.
Republicans can't even say it without swallowing it.
@shavixmir saidWhy do you think it was so [inaudible]?
Her name is Ondick?
Denise Ondick?
Okay. Nothing funny about that.
@dood111 saidNot a problem make a note in your diary for November 2024, but if you do win don’t expect the Dem candidate to concede or 80 million dem voters to accept the result.
Democrats stole the election through fraud and we need to have another HONEST one.
@earl-of-trumps saidIt could Maybe be counted as evidence if the Family Name was not [inaudible] so that anyone could run the test. What is the source of the transcript. Did the persion in the know put that into a court Action? (The Trump Team had far weaker "evidence" why would they have not been on this as a prime exmpale?)
So there ya go!!
they b'yotch for evidence of voter fraud, you show them, they call BS and a lot of other diversionary stuff
way to go, brain trust. How to address an issue - with intimidation, ad hominems, and ignorance.
Of course, I could have predicted this from this cast of chracters
@suzianne saidYou had years of investigation and came up with SQUAT.
No, you know what actually deserves investigation? Donald Trump. For corruption, if nothing else. We tried to investigate him and tried to impeach him and tried to get him removed from office for his way-more-than-obvious corruption. The right fought us tooth and nail all the way, even going so far as to make up 'moral' fairy tales, talking about how Democrats were tryin ...[text shortened]... wn "coup d'état" by reversing that same fair election.
Republicans. Best hypocrites EVAR!!!!1!!1
@metal-brain saidAnybody can claim to be anybody on this site that’s the joy of it and I can judge for myself the veracity of their assertion.
I am an American from Michigan. You calling me a Russian bot is a lie. If you continue this harassment and slander I will lobby to have you banned from posting on this site for 1 month.
@earl-of-trumps saidIt's the same case your link referred to, Earl. I find the case of deceased Denise strangely moving, and at the same time deeply symbolic of everything that is profoundly troubling about Trump's presidency.
Moonbus,
I don't think it needed discussion at all, as it has nothing AT ALL to do with what I posted, nor does finding resolution in *your* case resolve a FOOKING thing in the case I posted.
Chessplayer, you are. Logical Detective - not so much.,
@kevcvs57 saidAnybody can allege unsubstantiated claims. It doesn't make it true. You alert me to the mods because you are incapable of proving me wrong. If you were capable of that you would have done it by now.
Anybody can claim to be anybody on this site that’s the joy of it and I can judge for myself the veracity of their assertion.
I’ve already started alerting the mods to your constant spamming threads regarding unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud. It’s getting to the point where every other thread is you attacking the very concept of democracy.
That’s your privilege, but surely a couple of threads would suffice if it’s not a coordinated spoiler campaign.
@metal-brain saidWell, that's just the problem here. Unsubstantiated claims stand in need of proofs. The more improbable the claims, the more needful the proofs be sound and well attested. If your point is that someone somewhere sometime committed some fraud or other, it's trivial. There's no point to it, and no point in disputing it either.
Anybody can allege unsubstantiated claims. It doesn't make it true. You alert me to the mods because you are incapable of proving me wrong. If you were capable of that you would have done it by now.
You are a liar. Voter fraud exists in the USA and that is a fact. I NEVER claimed to know how much voter fraud there is. I have said nobody knows several times.
Prove ...[text shortened]... that way making you believe I am a Russian bot. Unjust censorship results in exactly what you hate.
@moonbus saidTrump does have proof. I already proved he does.
Well, that's just the problem here. Unsubstantiated claims stand in need of proofs. The more improbable the claims, the more needful the proofs be sound and well attested. If your point is that someone somewhere sometime committed some fraud or other, it's trivial. There's no point to it, and no point in disputing it either.
Furthermore, it is not needful to prove the oppo ...[text shortened]... ed any such proof of impossibility; those who claim that such things exist have the burden of proof.
@metal-brain saidNo one number is the right answer. That isn't an evasive answer. Trump would need to show enough fraud and miscounts in each of several states to get the electoral commissions of several states to change the result from Biden to Trump. How much depends on Biden's lead in each state. In GA roughly 11,000, in WI roughly 20,000, in PA about 80,000, in MI about 150,000. No proof of that magnitude has been presented; what's been presented are a few sporadic incidents, which are almost without exception explainable as glitches, counting errors (within tolerance of 0.5% or whatever as defined by state law), honest mistakes, misinterpretations of facts, or other anomalies which have already been corrected -- nowhere near enough to justify a re-assignment of the result in even one state. Several federal judges, at least one of whom was appointed by Trump himself, have dismissed his cases as "meritless" -- why? Because his allegations are not backed by anything like 'proof' which would stand up in court.
Trump does have proof. I already proved he does.
How much voter fraud does he have to prove? 100? 1000? 10,000? 100,000?
It isn't a trick question. How much?