1. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    25 Sep '10 15:03
    Originally posted by Eladar
    When [politicians] take a mile after we've given them an inch, it is about time we excercise our right given to us by the right to bear arms.
    Ladies and Gentlemen. Introducing Eladar. One of RHP's prominent Tea Party supporters.
  2. Russ's Pocket
    Joined
    04 May '06
    Moves
    53845
    25 Sep '10 15:12
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    It IS a position of power, period. There are many sectors of public service that involve all different kinds of power.

    Politicians affect legislation that affects our lives.

    Police officers have the power of arrest.

    The military yields massive amounts of lethal force

    The FDA has the power to decide what drugs and foods can be legally sold.

    The list goes on.
    Police officers have the power of arrest.
    Not according to n1m.
  3. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    25 Sep '10 15:14
    Originally posted by cheshirecatstevens
    [b]Police officers have the power of arrest.
    Not according to n1m.[/b]
    I'd love to see a cite supporting that statement.
  4. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    25 Sep '10 16:11
    Originally posted by Wajoma
    You poor sap.
    The fact that so many lefties believe that what I call wrong with America isn't actually a problem just goes to show how far the US has gone down the road of the New Class.
  5. Joined
    07 Mar '09
    Moves
    27924
    25 Sep '10 20:47
    Originally posted by Eladar
    The only power they have is what we give them. When they take a mile after we've given them an inch, it is about time we excercise our right given to us by the right to bear arms.
    Is that treason?
  6. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    25 Sep '10 20:48
    Originally posted by TerrierJack
    Is that treason?
    How do you think this country was created? Treason is only feared by those who believe in the dominaiton of government. Any government that steps beyond its rightful place needs to be replaced.
  7. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    26 Sep '10 00:261 edit
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Any government that steps beyond its rightful place needs to be replaced.
    Do you personally get to decide what "steps beyond its rightful place" means? And do you personally get to decide exactly when this stepping beyond is deemed to have happened? You decide 'what' and you decide 'when' and then you can resort to using firearms against elected officials or public employees? Have I got the 'right' you are asserting right?
  8. Joined
    07 Mar '09
    Moves
    27924
    26 Sep '10 00:27
    Originally posted by Eladar
    How do you think this country was created? Treason is only feared by those who believe in the dominaiton of government. Any government that steps beyond its rightful place needs to be replaced.
    So you are in fact advocating treason?
  9. Joined
    08 Oct '08
    Moves
    5542
    26 Sep '10 00:38
    Originally posted by Eladar
    How do you think this country was created? Treason is only feared by those who believe in the dominaiton of government. Any government that steps beyond its rightful place needs to be replaced.
    Do you really want to see a violent revolution? Because it's not 1776 anymore - they wouldn't be fighting this battle with muskets and bayonets. And not every revolution goes as nicely as that one did (the French Revolution is Exhibit A for all the things that can go wrong even in an 18th century world.)
  10. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    26 Sep '10 00:53
    If things get bad enough? Sure, but as you said this isn't the 1700's and if such a revolution were to succeed it would require that soldiers join the revolution. Soldiers would be duty bound to rebel if they decide that the government no longer follows the Constitution.
  11. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    26 Sep '10 00:532 edits
    Originally posted by Melanerpes
    Do you really want to see a violent revolution? Because it's not 1776 anymore - they wouldn't be fighting this battle with muskets and bayonets. And not every revolution goes as nicely as that one did (the French Revolution is Exhibit A for all the things that can go wrong even in an 18th century world.)
    WARNING "BAD" WORDS ETC

    YouTube
    YouTube
  12. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    26 Sep '10 01:13
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Soldiers would be duty bound to rebel if they decide that the government no longer follows the Constitution.
    "...if they decide..."?

    So it is for each individual U.S. soldier to decide when and why they turn their firearms on (some or all of) their superior officers, the nation's elected representatives and public employees?
  13. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    26 Sep '10 01:14
    Eladar's the kind of guy who cheered Caesar on back in the day. Right wing military coup ftw.
  14. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    26 Sep '10 01:15
    Originally posted by FMF
    "...if they decide..."?

    So it is for each individual U.S. soldier to decide when and why they turn their firearms on (some or all of) their superior officers, the nation's elected representatives and public employees?
    Yeah, you know...like Los Zetas!
  15. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    26 Sep '10 02:07
    Originally posted by FMF
    "...if they decide..."?

    So it is for each individual U.S. soldier to decide when and why they turn their firearms on (some or all of) their superior officers, the nation's elected representatives and public employees?
    We're all free moral agents. Who would or could make such a decision other than the individual? Simply being the legal leaders of a nation don't impart moral infallibility; a German soldier during the Nazi years who turned his weapon against his superior officers and public employees surely wouldn't deserve moral condemnation.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree