While Trump fumes, Joe gets to work

Old Man Joe can't work past noon without needing a nap he's not doing diddly squat, Kamala and his handlers are putting everything together while he rests.

@mott-the-hoople said
go somewhere and masturbate...too much pressure on you brain right now.

mth is a proud boy
masturbates once a month
alone

@shavixmir said
From the BBC:

International monitors praise US election
A team of international monitors from the Organization of American States (OAS) has praised the conduct of the US election.

The delegation - which had 28 experts and observers from 13 countries - said in its preliminary report: "While the environment of the elections was competitive and fraught, the ability of v ...[text shortened]... s there, responding to President Trump's claims that the Democrats had tried to steal the elections.

"The monitors were able to follow campaigning events and the voting itself on 3 November in several locations, including the key battleground states of Georgia and Michigan."

Did they monitor Antrim County MI? As I recall "the monitors" did not discover republican votes being flipped to democrats because of human error.

Were the "monitors" too busy eating donuts to do their job?

@no1marauder said
If Congress had wanted to wait until the Electors cast their ballots before the provisions of the PTA became effective, they would have said so.

They didn't and there is no reasonable interpretation that would suggest so.

Congress?
What does congress have to do with the electors?
What are you talking about?

@mott-the-hoople said
oh...I though the opposing party had to concede...oh thats right, they do...you are being a weasel again.

Sorry, there is nothing in the Presidential Transition Act requiring the losing candidates to concede. It would be an absurdity to allow a sore loser to defeat the will of Congress to have an orderly transition by a simple refusal to accept apparent defeat.

@metal-brain said
Congress?
What does congress have to do with the electors?
What are you talking about?

Read the law. I already provided the text on the last page.

EDIT: To remind you:

""The terms "President-elect" and "Vice-President-elect" as used in this Act shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful candidates for the office of President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained by the Administrator following the general elections held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg153.pdf Section 3(c)

@metal-brain said
"The monitors were able to follow campaigning events and the voting itself on 3 November in several locations, including the key battleground states of Georgia and Michigan."

Did they monitor Antrim County MI? As I recall "the monitors" did not discover republican votes being flipped to democrats because of human error.

Were the "monitors" too busy eating donuts to do their job?

No votes were "flipped". There was an error in tabulation by a Republican County Clerk that was quickly discovered and corrected.

@no1marauder said
If Congress had wanted to wait until the Electors cast their ballots before the provisions of the PTA became effective, they would have said so.

Congress IS the Electoral College.
My god you are ignorant.
Are you the one that claims to be a lawyer. or is that someone else?

@dood111 said
Congress IS the Electoral College.
My god you are ignorant.
Are you the one that claims to be a lawyer. or is that someone else?

LMAO!

You think Congress is the Electoral College and then have the ballsz to call someone else "ignorant"?

@no1marauder said
Sorry, there is nothing in the Presidential Transition Act requiring the losing candidates to concede. It would be an absurdity to allow a sore loser to defeat the will of Congress to have an orderly transition by a simple refusal to accept apparent defeat.

But that has already happened. The GSA denied Biden transition information and money. An orderly transition has already been thwarted by DJT.

Do you know why Biden merely threatened to take legal action against the GSA and never did? Because Biden has no legal ground to stand on, that is why. He is not the president elect and will not be until Dec. 14 at the soonest.....unless Trump decides to concede.

During Bush v. Gore debacle Al Gore had nothing from the GSA either. Do you know why? Because he was not the president elect.

Have you accepted these facts yet? The news media wants you to think Biden won. That way even if Trump wins in the end you will think he stole the election. And the divide and conquer tactic is taken to a new level.

It is kind of like Star Wars. Embrace your hate for one another.....mwaahahaha!

@no1marauder said
No votes were "flipped". There was an error in tabulation by a Republican County Clerk that was quickly discovered and corrected.

Votes were flipped. That is how it was discovered!

You seem to be in denial of basic facts. You can explain why they were flipped and how it was an accident all you want. Republican votes were flipped to democrat votes so much it was obvious something was wrong. That is how it was discovered.

Once again, just because it was obvious and discovered in one county does not mean it was discovered in all counties. This justifies a recount in Michigan. A judge ruled against it anyway? Was he a democrat? You are the partisan guru here. You should know.

@no1marauder said
Read the law. I already provided the text on the last page.

EDIT: To remind you:

""The terms "President-elect" and "Vice-President-elect" as used in this Act shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful candidates for the office of President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained by the Administrator following the general elections held to determ ...[text shortened]... ons 1 and 2.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg153.pdf Section 3(c)

That proves nothing.

Why do some states have mandatory recounts when the election is very close? There is a reason. What is it?

@metal-brain said
But that has already happened. The GSA denied Biden transition information and money. An orderly transition has already been thwarted by DJT.

Do you know why Biden merely threatened to take legal action against the GSA and never did? Because Biden has no legal ground to stand on, that is why. He is not the president elect and will not be until Dec. 14 at the soonest.. ...[text shortened]... n to a new level.

It is kind of like Star Wars. Embrace your hate for one another.....mwaahahaha!

You're ridiculous.

Biden team is considering legal action; that they haven't actually taken it since yesterday proves absolutely nothing. They're probably in negotiation with the GSA hoping to avoid it. Not everyone has the patience of a five year old like yourself.

There was no apparent winner in 2000 for about a month; there were only a few hundred votes separating the two main candidates in the decisive State. By contrast, Biden is just as much, if not more, the apparent winner than Trump was in 2016 - he leads in States that get him to exactly the same amount of EC votes and his leads are bigger in the decisive States.

It is you who are refusing to accept facts. And apparently refusing to read the applicable statute.

@no1marauder said
You're ridiculous.

Biden team is considering legal action; that they haven't actually taken it since yesterday proves absolutely nothing. They're probably in negotiation with the GSA hoping to avoid it. Not everyone has the patience of a five year old like yourself.

There was no apparent winner in 2000 for about a month; there were only a few hundred votes separatin ...[text shortened]...
It is you who are refusing to accept facts. And apparently refusing to read the applicable statute.

Why do you want an apparent winner now? Why is it so important? We have until Jan. 20th or something like that. What is your hurry?

If Biden really wants unity like he said, why doesn't he encourage recounts to reaffirm his legitimacy as POTUS? Do you want him to go through the same thing Trump did for 4 years? After all, if Trump is so wrong why is Biden not eager to prove it to benefit himself?

You don't want to be talking about Electiongate for the next 4 years, do you?

"Biden team is considering legal action"

LOL!
Didn't you claim the BSA was run by some unreasonable partisan hack or something along those lines? Is Biden waiting for an apology from this unreasonable partisan hack? LOL!!!

Stop pretending you do not know better. Biden will not sue because he has no case. Why do you think Trump took legal action to stop certification of the vote in certain states? It is not over and it never was.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/dont-fall-psyop-biden-not-officially-president-elect-at-least-not-yet/5728913