Originally posted by normbenignIt is not extraneous but fundamental. If everyting from WND is not gospel (and that is a generous characterization), why would you think the cite in your original post has any credibility.
By citing an article from WND, I hardly implied that everything there was gospel. Why not stick to the OP, and deal with it rather than divert attention to extraneous matters.
Your panties were in a twist when GWBush was President, and DHS was his powerful, unconstitutional organization. Now, with a different President, it is all hunky dorry?
Originally posted by moon1969If the OP is not accurate, it should be pretty easy to find a news source which contradicts WND. Instead of making it an ideological argument, try to make it factual.
It is not extraneous but fundamental. If everyting from WND is not gospel (and that is a generous characterization), why would you think the cite in your original post has any credibility.
Originally posted by normbenignI wonder if the parachuter is an agent. Notice how he will argue against anything that points out new world order agenda? He still tries to use words like conspiracy theory in the negative, hoping it will have the same effect it had a few years ago. Also trying to give the impression the military is liberal.
Why would he use terminology which was absurd on its face? And please stop calling me stupid, or just FO.
Originally posted by joe beyserThe fact that so many want to just kill the messenger, tells me that WND may be onto something, maybe lots of things.
I wonder if the parachuter is an agent. Notice how he will argue against anything that points out new world order agenda? He still tries to use words like conspiracy theory in the negative, hoping it will have the same effect it had a few years ago. Also trying to give the impression the military is liberal.
Originally posted by joe beyserLOL!
I wonder if the parachuter is an agent. Notice how he will argue against anything that points out new world order agenda? He still tries to use words like conspiracy theory in the negative, hoping it will have the same effect it had a few years ago. Also trying to give the impression the military is liberal.
No rebuttal. I'm just going let this stupidity stand on its own merit.
Originally posted by normbenignThe World Nut Daily is not a reliable news source.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/why-is-government-stockpiling-guns-ammo/
This article examines an Obama campaign promise, and current policy and asks why?
Well why?
The author of the article provides no evidence that "Washington is stockpiling massive amounts of ammunition." No evidence at all that billions of rounds of ammo were delivered. Until he can support his claim, this is a hoax.
Originally posted by moon1969http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/021213-644201-dhs-buys-7000-semiautomatic-assault-weapons.htm
The World Nut Daily is not a reliable news source.
The author of the article provides no evidence that "Washington is stockpiling massive amounts of ammunition." No evidence at all that billions of rounds of ammo were delivered. Until he can support his claim, this is a hoax.
http://www.kveo.com/news/ammunition-stockpiling-causing-shortages-gun-stores
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/02/16/ammunition-shortage/1919321/
You knuckledraggers who found it so easy to make light of WND, could have confirmed the story, or sought out contradictory information, but instead ignorantly tried to kill the messenger, and now end up with egg on your collective faces.
