2 edits
@averagejoe1 saidIs the woman you're talking about your daughter? If not, your post is creepy. If so, that's probably even creepier.
My daughter is beautiful and angel-like. Don't get you there....
Your dodge about wins at a sport is quite entertaining here in the forum, you LEAVE OUT the crux of the discussion, that the individual is competing not in just 'a sport', but in a sport event limited to women
See my very first sentence, where I say I don't think trans women should compete against cis-gender women. I didn't "dodge", I actually agreed with you there.
Why is your reading comprehension so trash? Why?
Through I agree without you about trans-women competing against cis-women, the constant posting is tiresome and seems little more than an excuse to gloat about men having physical advantages. Your creepy, diminutive "sweet little angel" comment is evidence of that.
1 edit
There is no doubt in my mind that libs, WOKEs and Cancels are doing what they can
do demolish Western Civilization and send us back to the caveman days.
I like living in a country where women are given enough respect that they can compete FAIRLY
on their own plain. Forcing women to compete against men (physical) will lead to women
simply not competing any more. As James Brown once sang, "This is a Man's World"
You go, libs
Just a word, if I may, about discrimination
In my town of Boston, they run a marathon every year about this time.
This marathon race, like most others, chooses to have many divisions, the two biggest are Men's and Women's.
But they also have divisions for wheelchairs, blind/visually impaired, and seniors (M&F). Cool.
Now, notice that technically this is discriminating, to which I say, "So what?". you should be able to.
So why then can't sporting organizations that face this encroachment of men in the women's athletics problem,
say that they are discriminating and only letting in women that are woman-bodied. SIMPLE.
But you watch how Libs will shoot the idea down. You watch. f'n snakes,
@earl-of-trumps saidThe "caveman days" when people accepted the gender choices of others?
There is no doubt in my mind that libs, WOKEs and Cancels are doing what they can
do demolish Western Civilization and send us back to the caveman days.
@mchill saidIt is a given that anyone would agree with Martina, that it is wrong, so your comment is vacuous.
then how can you sit here on the Forum and vent the same way that I do about concepts or laws or decisions that are made outside of our control?
You are saying that I should not state opinions on the Forum.
Dear Joe - I don't recall "venting" about anything here (except possibly too many ads on YouTube) The fact remains neither myself nor any other Liberal dictates NCAA ru ...[text shortened]... age. So please don't label all Liberals as villains in this matter. We're really not you know. 🙂
We do indeed vent on the forum, don't get you there. Pick another word if you'd like, did not mean to strain your sensibilities.
You say "We have nothing to do with it." what in the world. Everyone, McHill says only write about things that we have to do with. Ha. What if Zahlanzi is a spotter at the event,,,,is he allowed to write about it!?!? Geez, this is extremely entertaining.
"Claiming they have an unfair advantage". They do, McHill. Be a man, or a transman, and tell us they have an unfair advantage.
What a laugh. Let the courts decide. You know, I don't have a child in the CRT curriculum, so you are telling me that I cannot comment on that abomination, because I have nothing to do with it.. Let the courts decide.
Time for you to have a heart-to-heart with yourself.
@vivify saidNice try. You said next,,,,"Where a trans-woman wins At A Sport".
Is the woman you're talking about your daughter? If not, your post is creepy. If so, that's probably even creepier.
Your dodge about wins at a sport is quite entertaining here in the forum, you LEAVE OUT the crux of the discussion, that the individual is competing not in just 'a sport', but in a sport event limited to women
See my very first sentence, where I ...[text shortened]... ving physical advantages. Your creepy, diminutive "sweet little angel" comment is evidence of that.
You limited your comment by NOT saying 'wins in a women's sport',, or competing with women in their women's final. Your fans are embarrassed that you are still dancing around this. There is a reason that you did not make a statement dead on issue. You lose this one, and you definitely lose the point.
If you and I were chatting on a plane and you said your trans-niece won, competing in a sport today, it would be disingenuous if you were not forthcoming as to what she was REALLY competing in. Do you often veil your comments to suit the moment?
4 edits
@averagejoe1 saidSorry, I assumed you weren't a completely brain-dead retard. I assumed by starting the first line of my first post with a position that actually agrees with yours, that I don't need to do so on each and every subsequent post, because I thought you weren't a senile thick-skulled imbecile.
Nice try. You said next,,,,"Where a trans-woman wins At A Sport".
You limited your comment by NOT saying 'wins in a women's sport',, or competing with women in their women's final.
My mistake.
@vivify saidI do not understand that sentence, seriously. Cut the fat. You said Trans woman 'Wins in a sport". You omitted the nature of the sport, which was a WOMAN's final. Jesus.; Do you not admit that that makes a difference, that it was not 'just' a sport???? That, it was limited to women, and you chose to just call it a sport????
Sorry, I assumed you weren't a completely brain-dead retard. I assumed by starting the first line of my first post with a position that actually agrees with yours, that I don't need to do so on each and every subsequent post, because I thought you weren't a senile thick-skulled imbecile.
My mistake.
What has the fact that you agree he/she should not have been in the competition got to do with anything. What you agree is irrelevant. What you SAID was disingenuous. In this post you attempt to dance around that. If I am wrong, please restate. You can do this.
@AverageJoe1
The seat mate on the plane, he goes home and says this great new friend has a daughter who won her swim meet.!!! Don't you think his sweet little innocent wife should know she'd been a man, and that it was a women's meet? She may go tell all the neighbors how wonderful that was. Then a picture in the papers, and her neighbors find out what what was REALLY going on, and our seat mate's wife is shamed.
I know this is hard for libs to diseminate, that's why I'm here. This should wrap up this thread.
JesusH!
@averagejoe1 saidI feel sorry for you Joe. I really do - 😕
@AverageJoe1
The seat mate on the plane, he goes home and says this great new friend has a daughter who won her swim meet.!!! Don't you think his sweet little innocent wife should know she'd been a man, and that it was a women's meet? She may go tell all the neighbors how wonderful that was. Then a picture in the papers, and her neighbors find out what what was REALLY ...[text shortened]... is hard for libs to diseminate, that's why I'm here. This should wrap up this thread.
JesusH!
1 edit
@earl-of-trumps said“ There is no doubt in my mind that libs, WOKEs and Cancels are doing what they can
There is no doubt in my mind that libs, WOKEs and Cancels are doing what they can
do demolish Western Civilization and send us back to the caveman days.
I like living in a country where women are given enough respect that they can compete FAIRLY
on their own plain. Forcing women to compete against men (physical) will lead to women
simply not competing any more. As James Brown once sang, "This is a Man's World"
You go, libs
do demolish Western Civilization and send us back to the caveman days. ”
You might want to google hyperbole earl.
The base are constantly using this topic to fire themselves up, it’s like they are worried that if they don’t play the ‘end of civilisation as we know it’ card every 5 minutes they’ll lose the mid terms.
I can’t think of a so called liberal on these forums who thinks cis women being edged out of competitive sport by trans women is a good idea.
When common sense prevails and someone starts cis women only sporting events, I wonder what woke monstrosity you guys will latch onto to fuel your fiery outrage.
@mchill saidSeriously, you know I am right. My analogy of a person on the plane being told being a half truth by Vivify, and the result of the half truth. Very good post, I would think. And no I-Feel-Sorry-For-You links.
I feel sorry for you Joe. I really do - 😕
If we were debating on stage at W&L, would links be allowed? A big screen to mirror your findings for me and judges to absorb?Maybe clap thereafter?
Be specific, tell us libs and conservatives alike, for what do you feel sorry for me? 🤔
- Joined
- 28 Feb 16
- Moves
- 5026
@vivify saidSo, are you contrasting conservative thought on this subject (trans-women in women’s sport) with that of liberals? If so, you mean liberals think trans-women competing in women’s sports is “smart?”
I agree with anyone's right to transition, I don't agree trans women should compete against cis-gender women.
That said, I'm getting tired of this subject constantly coming up. why do we need a thread of every single instance where a trans-woman wins at a sport? We get it: conservatives think trans-women in sports is dumb. We don't need monthly updates of this.
@liljo saidFrom the very post you quoted:
So, are you contrasting conservative thought on this subject (trans-women in women’s sport) with that of liberals? If so, you mean liberals think trans-women competing in women’s sports is “smart?”
"I don't agree trans women should compete against cis-gender women."
Why is the reading comprehension of conservatives so trash?
@vivify said“ See my very first sentence, where I say I don't think trans women should compete against cis-gender women”
Is the woman you're talking about your daughter? If not, your post is creepy. If so, that's probably even creepier.
Your dodge about wins at a sport is quite entertaining here in the forum, you LEAVE OUT the crux of the discussion, that the individual is competing not in just 'a sport', but in a sport event limited to women
See my very first sentence, where I ...[text shortened]... ving physical advantages. Your creepy, diminutive "sweet little angel" comment is evidence of that.
you are speaking about something that doesnt exist…therein lies your problem.