2 edits
Originally posted by royalchickenno worries, i wasn't asking you. 😀
I'm the wrong person to ask, not being married...
but someday, you'll no doubt will be mr. right and make someone very happy.
then you can have 2 children and name them orville and wilbur - ok i am making the thread depunerate, but i can't seem to help it. in any case, i meant what i said in the second line - that is the only redeeming thing about me 🙁
in apologeticship,
prad
Originally posted by pradtfSadly the stereo types probobly apply to about 3 couples I know.
well that's what i'm wondering about?
in friendship,
prad
There is almost always some reason for a stereo type. I have seen stereo types lived out right in front of me. I always thought they were bogus until I observed them.
Mike
It is a terribly complex and conflicting issue. Let me explain. People were not created monogomous. There are some species in the animal kingdom that were, but homosapians were not. However, and this is important, we were told by God (this is our perception, Rob, so don't get all over me about how religion is BS. 🙂 )that we should be monogomous. Thus we are conflicted and frustrated. The act of marriage, while uniting couples in the strength of commitment, also goes against our basic instincts.
Originally posted by kirksey957I dunno about that kirk, I have not looked at another woman since I met my wife.
It is a terribly complex and conflicting issue. Let me explain. People were not created monogomous. There are some species in the animal kingdom that were, but homosapians were not. However, and this is important, we were told by God (this is our perception, Rob, so don't get all over me about how religion is BS. 🙂 )that we should be monogomous. T ...[text shortened]... e, while uniting couples in the strength of commitment, also goes against our basic instincts.
Mike
1 edit
Originally posted by kirksey957i don't understand this.
It is a terribly complex and conflicting issue. Let me explain. People were not created monogomous. There are some species in the animal kingdom that were, but homosapians were not. However, and this is important, we were told by God ...[text shortened]... e strength of commitment, also goes against our basic instincts.
how is it that people can be created monogamous or polygamous (not in the legal sense, of course)
isn't it simply a choice?
in friendship,
prad
Originally posted by pradtfChoice. I could be out tom catting around I guess if I wanted to, but I made a promise to my wife I would not. I don't go back on a promise.
i don't understand this.
how is it that people can be created monogamous or polygamous (not in the legal sense, of course)
isn't it simply a choice?
in friendship,
prad
Mike
Originally posted by pradtfI don't think so. There are some species that mate for life and it is not hardwired into their "system" to stray so to speak. That's all I was saying.
i don't understand this.
how is it that people can be created monogamous or polygamous (not in the legal sense, of course)
isn't it simply a choice?
in friendship,
prad
Originally posted by elvendreamgirlI have no complaints with my wife. We go through more positions that would make the writer of "Kama Sutra" blush. Sometimes it isn't the womans fault. Some guys just want to knock off a "quickie" and thats it. My thoughts are if you are knocking the bottom out of that thing then your sex will never be boring.😉😛😏😵🙂
I have noticed l;ately alot of commentsfrom men and women regarding married couple's sexual relationships. From what I am hearinf\g, it seems alot of wives refuse to do the "fun" sex things. They only want your basic missionary style sex act. Is this true? If so, WHY?????
I would think married couples would have a field day doing everything there is to do out there!!!! I certainly will when ALex and I marry.
Originally posted by skeeterMichelle, I can understand your feelings here, and I respect your assertions, but I think some of the comments made here at the beginning of this thread are important, albeit humourous. These men are using humour to express that they agree that the statement I made is true.
Call me a prude but I find the tone of this thread degenerating into[b]".....offensive" Tone it down or I will alert it. Thanks.
Michelle[/b]
I find it sad that so many people do not enjoy sex after marriage. Sex and even more importantly, intimacy, are vital parts of a marriage. How sad to be married to someone for your entire life without being physically loved or even touched.
I wonder if part of it is the old-fashioned or even Puritanical views many people still have ingrained in their belief systems. I know that the Puritanical belief system still affects life here in the USA, and the Victorian belief system still affects the UK.
Originally posted by kirksey957that certainly seems to be true for some species.
I don't think so. There are some species that mate for life and it is not hardwired into their "system" to stray so to speak. That's all I was saying.
are you sure though that humans are hardwired for polygamy?
even if that is so, we can still make the choice one way or another.
for example, some partners choose a 1:1 existence. some choose otherwise.
i don't see what hardwiring has to do with it in the case of homo sapiens.
in friendship,
prad