Go back
You said he couldn’t do it. Russia tomorrow or Friday?!?

You said he couldn’t do it. Russia tomorrow or Friday?!?

Debates


@Suzianne said
Ok, this irony is too real.
I work better with trans people. Does that make sense?
Nope. Fargin stupid!


@Metal-Brain said
Cherry picked data. It makes no sense. In fact, it defies common sense. Working with someone different does not improve my work performance. It is the dumbest thing I have heard lately.
I'm sure to someone as stupid and ignorant as you it "makes no sense".

Try reading the report or having someone considerably smarter than you (there must be bright 13 year olds in your neighborhood) read it and explain it to you and maybe it will.


@no1marauder said
So he's going to restore aid to the Ukranians, just like they want, and he's got them to support a 30 day ceasefire, which benefits them as the Russians have been making gains militarily (albeit modest ones). And in return he got ...................... apparently nothing.

Yeah, some negotiating; look like Zelensky won that round.
He will get himself nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, just you wait. 😆


@wildgrass said
The trump administration stopped reporting the deportation numbers, but by all accounts they are deporting fewer than Biden was, despite spending a lot more money. 🤑
Yeah, sending them out a dozen at a time on C 130 military transports big enough to hold a half dozen tanks and a cost of three times a civilian jet......


@my-king-and-i removed their quoted post
Right. 1959. I remember that year, in out town, Escondido, north of San Diego, nice liberal town, right?
Unless you were black, ok to work here but you better be the hell out of town by 5 PM.

1 edit

@MetalBrain,
It appears you've managed to make many new friends on here. 😉

-VR

1 edit

@My-King-And-I said
@Suzianne

I've seen job postings that stipulated it was only available to poc, indigenous, crap, etc

If they can be racist, so can I.

I'm not a traitor like you, nor am I living in fear of being called racist like the liberals.

I can give as good as I get 😘
Try getting over yourself!!!

You might become more disliked than MetalBrain or Cliff!!! 😉

Perhaps I shouldn't leave out AverageJoe1. 😉

-VR


@Very-Rusty said
Try getting over yourself!!!

You might become more disliked than MetalBrain or Cliff!!! 😉

Perhaps I shouldn't leave out AverageJoe1. 😉

-VR
We never are told why you do not like Trump, nor why you do not like average Joe


@AverageJoe1 said
We never are told why you do not like Trump, nor why you do not like average Joe
Hey I guess I can ask, since you don’t like me anyway. You mention equal..If Jake decides that he is a dog, on all fours, the works, should you regard him as a dog and treat him respectfully as a dog? After all, you regard a man who says he is a woman as a woman. Of course, by you, I mean all of the Woke society.
Please an honest answer, it will help me with some decision-making.


@Metal-Brain said
No. Those are assertions without explanation.
You found a website that is full of crap. You sought out a confirmation bias that makes no sense.

Where is your evidence?
His ‘evidence’ is the subjective opinions of, well, some people. Some of them are Berkeley graduates. If they are in the least biased, neither you, me, nor Marauder have any reason to waste time on their weeenie study. Really, you would think they would have something better to do. But then maybe they don’t.




@my-king-and-i removed their quoted post
You godda be kidding. It is your imitation of a human being wannabe king who wants to take us back, not to !959 but EIGHTEEN 59.
Tariffs on our fuuking ALLIES? What could possibly go wrong. Wait, it already HAS.


@AverageJoe1 said
His ‘evidence’ is the subjective opinions of, well, some people. Some of them are Berkeley graduates. If they are in the least biased, neither you, me, nor Marauder have any reason to waste time on their weeenie study. Really, you would think they would have something better to do. But then maybe they don’t.
No, I presented data, not "subjective opinions." I then presented logical explanations of the data largely based on well-known aspects of human psychology.

Besides, huffing and huffing, neither you or MB presented anything in rebuttal, certainly no facts or data.


@no1marauder said
No, I presented data, not "subjective opinions." I then presented logical explanations of the data largely based on well-known aspects of human psychology.

Besides, huffing and huffing, neither you or MB presented anything in rebuttal, certainly no facts or data.
The CEO of Starbucks just announced that he is, in the interest of cost cutting, laying off 1100 corporate employees.
Your reasoning of this highly-regarded factual study would dictate that they must be sure to pick and choose who they lay off on....based on what factors?
On their failure to be as effective as another employee?? No, not that. Of course, that is how AvJoe and Trump would do it, but you and suzianne would apply the mysterious rules of DEI, and make sure some ineffective DEI types would remain at SBucks while better employess are let go.

Common sense, Marauder. Common dam sense. What would you do if you have to cut staff at your peanut factory? Don't lie to us. What would you do if you had to reduce to a leaner staff. (so you could make a lot more money for your stockholders). Would you write your stockholders and say we have to apply DEI rules, might cost us a bit of reduced performance? Would you attach a copy of the Psychological Article to your correspondence?? Marauder??

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.