1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidYup. And the US will not land one boot on the ground to help.
Ukraine did call on us, as recently as today.
@averagejoe1 said$7 trillion for nothing.
You are correct. Your president, a puppet, is controlled by the Greenies, and by Obama, and a touch of Soros. THEY will not help Ukraine. It is not Biden. I wish we could all agree to use the phrase "the administration' in place of Biden....a common reader.
So you are correct, the administration is not helping Ukraine worth a damn. Take this post and run with it.
@averagejoe1 saidWell, my two faced friends, wasn't all that long ago that you,
If Russia moved on Scandinavia, Romania or Scotland, who-you-gonna-call? Why didn't Zelensky call on Scandinavia or Finland to help them? I get the answer being something about NATO, but if you say that, you are avoiding facing the fact that you think the USA has too much military.
Yeah, right.
So, any takers here? Esp you who have said our country is overmilitarized?
and your fellows, were parroting PUTIN's call, and
TRUMPS echo for ,''.....a reduced U.S. role in NATO...''
Where do you stand? Pusillanimous punks.
Where do any of you stand?...
Let's ask Lindsay Graham, a real strong voice and a steadfast leader
with the spine of a jellyfish...Call yourselves patriots,
my eyes well up when I think of some of them boys.
TRUMP's romacing Putin again, I see,
musta' just been a lovers spat.
If TRUMP were a statesman, who holds sway with Vlad,
don't you think the world would be better served by trying to negociate a settlement, than playing golf at Mir-Lago?
@mott-the-hoople saidAnother, well thought out
just wait
and clever retort from our very own ,
''Self Appointed Forum Proctologist.''
@averagejoe1 saidObviously.
May I rephrase…. Do you think, as most liberals on the forum have said in the past, that the United States should not build up its military or maintain its present military strength? That, such money should be, or should have been, spent on other things?
We're on the brink of WW III and not a single F-35 has left the hangar. What a waste of money.
@averagejoe1 saidSo, this massive US army you refer to… it’s stepped up to the base and is doing something? Like it did with Crimea?
If Russia moved on Scandinavia, Romania or Scotland, who-you-gonna-call? Why didn't Zelensky call on Scandinavia or Finland to help them? I get the answer being something about NATO, but if you say that, you are avoiding facing the fact that you think the USA has too much military.
Yeah, right.
So, any takers here? Esp you who have said our country is overmilitarized?
Mhmmm?
@jimm619 saidWould we be better served if Trump visited with the Administration (Not necessarily wasting time with the person of Biden) and came up with some ideas?
Well, my two faced friends, wasn't all that long ago that you,
and your fellows, were parroting PUTIN's call, and
TRUMPS echo for ,''.....a reduced U.S. role in NATO...''
Where do you stand? Pusillanimous punks.
Where do any of you stand?...
Let's ask Lindsay Graham, a real strong voice and a steadfast leader
with the spine of a jellyfish...Call yourselves patriots, ...[text shortened]... the world would be better served by trying to negociate a settlement, than playing golf at Mir-Lago?
Yes. I often ask that question. Hell, he is so smart that we can just let the administration have their own original ideas, and then let trump Show Them How To Implement the ideas!!!! What is wrong with that? He did whip NATO into shape, knows how to get the attention of all the countries, lets us put HIS boots on the ground.
@jimm619 saidContrare'. It is a neat straight out comment from a conservative. He is saying we will step in. Putting his money where his mouth is. Like I did when I guaranteed that Putin would Not invade!!! 🙁
Another, well thought out
and clever retort from our very own ,
''Self Appointed Forum Proctologist.''
@wildgrass saidGood comment!
Obviously.
We're on the brink of WW III and not a single F-35 has left the hangar. What a waste of money.