@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidFar from impotent?!?!?
FFS learn from history Mike. The days of Empires are over. Stupidity is firmly in your camp, not mine.
I predict a stronger Europe as a result of the mess your president has caused. - Leave NATO already. You're a liability.
NATO without the US is far from impotent, with more than a million troops and modern weaponry at its disposal from the 31 other countr ...[text shortened]... ://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/07/europe/nato-ukraine-survive-without-united-states-analysis-intl-hnk-ml
The U.S. has the largest, most advanced military in the alliance (aircraft carriers, intelligence, nuclear weapons).
Roughly two-thirds of NATO’s total defense spending comes from the U.S.
NATO would miss the USA contributions.
if it weren’t for USA, NATO would still exist but be a durn sight weaker . Close to impotent.
We are the big guy. Everyone would miss us. We are the first country Zahlanzi would call if Romania was attacked.
1 edit
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidPoint taken, you are so spoiled, delusional, and so used to us taking care of your defense that you don’t have a clue. Do you realize we pay 70% of nato, what happens if that goes away?
FFS learn from history Mike. The days of Empires are over. Stupidity is firmly in your camp, not mine.
I predict a stronger Europe as a result of the mess your president has caused. - Leave NATO already. You're a liability.
NATO without the US is far from impotent, with more than a million troops and modern weaponry at its disposal from the 31 other countr ...[text shortened]... ://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/07/europe/nato-ukraine-survive-without-united-states-analysis-intl-hnk-ml
Take all those countries and now try and coordinate with 27 different languages just as one issue😆.
@mike69 saidlol the USA didn't invent English
Point taken, you are so spoiled, delusional, and so used to us taking care of your defense that you don’t have a clue. Do you realize we pay 70% of nato, what happens if that goes away?
Take all those countries and now try and coordinate with 27 different languages just as one issue😆.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidExactly.
Mike has a selective memory.
NATO doesn't nothing for us,......Oh err, apart from the whole Gulf war thing. But I don't want to talk about that. I'd rather belittle our allies and complain about them not following Trump blindly into an illegal war based on a lie.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou'd be a king who barely speaks English himself, you goober.
If I were king, any person who cannot speak English would be ejected back across the river.
@mike69 saidThey did it during WW2. Most of the same countries in Europe we called allies in WW2 are in NATO. They're still our allies, unless you're a spoiled child named Donald Trump.
Point taken, you are so spoiled, delusional, and so used to us taking care of your defense that you don’t have a clue. Do you realize we pay 70% of nato, what happens if that goes away?
Take all those countries and now try and coordinate with 27 different languages just as one issue😆.
@AverageJoe1 saidAnd thus the Alliance is important.
Far from impotent?!?!?
The U.S. has the largest, most advanced military in the alliance (aircraft carriers, intelligence, nuclear weapons).
Roughly two-thirds of NATO’s total defense spending comes from the U.S.
NATO would miss the USA contributions.
if it weren’t for USA, NATO would still exist but be a durn sight weaker . Close to impotent.
We are the big guy. Everyone would miss us. We are the first country Zahlanzi would call if Romania was attacked.
A unified Europe is in America's best interests.
Too bad your Führer is a spoiled, bratty man-child bully. He obviously doesn't give a damn about America, and since you follow him, neither do you.
@AverageJoe1 saidHypocrite.
If I were king, any person who cannot speak English would be ejected back across the river.
@Rajk999 saidSo we should all genuflect in Trump's general direction.
$30 Billion in 1940 = $700 Billion today adjusting for inflation. The UK was basically bankrupt, without food and weapons. Had it not been for US support the British would be speaking German. Not recognizing the role of the US [or reducing it in any way] in WWII, is really a sign of ingratitude, and is like if Ukranians in 50 years time forget with whose support they are fighting off Putin.
Nope!
We wouldn't be in this mess if it wasn't for him.
@mike69 saidYou are a dyed-in-the-wool idiot.
It lets us know they won’t be there for us ever, with this new liberal mindset and leaders. The world was a safer, better place before the woke mentality took over and patriots and logic took a backseat. I guess we can pack all of our stuff up, ship it home and leave. We need allies that do their part.
@AverageJoe1 saidThe UK did.
The us did not 'end' the blitz. Hitler did. you would bore the horns off a billy goat
They endured to the end and Hitler got tired of wasting millions in a frontal assault.
@AverageJoe1 saidThat's because you have no backbone.
All of the liberals, every last one of them, are all for the wrong things. They can defend nothing to any degree. No Police? Let illegal people live here? Let people vote without proof? Get money from the successful? Depend on govt to support them? Preach that a man can become a woman?. If I were a lib and read this, I would not feel good about myself.
1 edit
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidIndeed. We have the British people to thank as much as anyone else for winning the fight against the Third Reich. They were a stone that Hitler got tired of blunting his weapons upon.
Sir, we won the battle of Britain and endured the Blitz, which failed to break British morale or cripple its war industry.