Originally posted by stevetoddIt doesn't have to be a close match to be a good one, neither does the implication of a one sided match mean that it wasn't a good match. I'm not a utd fan but I enjoyed the game, it was a good game. Plenty of quality football from utd. It did die a little in the last 15 minutes but even so agreat reply to the events that happened in Rome last week.
Was it? I'm amazed! I didn't watch it, but assumed that it must have been one sided after seeing the result. Are you saying it was close but utd got lucky, but they won by a margin of 6 goals!
1 edit
Originally posted by 1WhiteKnightI disagree I think most would expect a good match to be closer than a one sided agme, but you are entitled to your opinion, and surely I must be too? as indeed onyx is.
It doesn't have to be a close match to be a good one, neither does the implication of a one sided match mean that it wasn't a good match. I'm not a utd fan but I enjoyed the game, it was a good game. Plenty of quality football from utd. It did die a little in the last 15 minutes but even so agreat reply to the events that happened in Rome last week.
Originally posted by stevetoddBeing a close match can be a good trait, but it's not the only one. Roma are no push-overs and MU's display was a beauty to watch for all football lovers.
I disagree I think a good match is a close rather than a one sided one, but you are entitled to your opinion, but surely I must be too? as indeed onyx is too
I was actually more impressed with Chelsea slowly but steadily asphyxiating Valencia, but I do think that being a close match is just one of many things that can make up a good match.