Originally posted by mikelomAccepted/unaccepted paradigms aside, seems the crux issue goes to the broader question of which RHP Member/Posters become content to cling to the past, flail at windmills, pontificate artificial (though popular) solutions as contrasted with those sturdy souls focusing their good will and energies on the present and attempting to do the deed that needs being done.
There is also a paradigm here, in those of whom you rec!
Seemingly unassociated objectives, or associated relatives of old time RHP!
It's seen to be bad to rec somebody of an old objective and assuming clan, rather than to move on and accept futures, which should be accumulative for RHP as a whole!
Enough said!
Edit: Then again, I'm just assumed to be an old abusing fart, so sod the words I just wrote! 😏
................................................................
Originally posted by Grampy Bobbyand what is this deed, oh magnificent one?
Accepted/unaccepted paradigms aside, seems the crux issue goes to the broader question of which RHP Member/Posters become content to cling to the past, flail at windmills, pontificate artificial (though popular) solutions as contrasted with those sturdy souls focusing their good will and energies on the present and attempting to do the deed that needs being done.
................................................................
2 edits
Originally posted by orion25Posting Guidelines - Overview
and what is this deed, oh magnificent one?
"... objective is to enable enjoyable forum usage. We want an environment where newcomers feel free to post to the forums without fear of being unfairly attacked and where posters don't feel overly-policed.
"We want the Red Hot Pawn forums to be as open as possible. All moderation will be made using best-judgment and will never be used to stifle opinion, so long as such posts remain within the boundaries set out here." -Russ & Chris
...........................................................
Note: Orion25, to me this statement suggests the inclusive privilege of equal freedom for all RHP Members & Subscribers to post on any and all of the site's public forums with the same daily initiative and self determination as they are invited to engage in chess. Member responsibilities include compliance with TOS Policy/Forum Posting Guidelines; fair chess play and civilized forum behavior. Bottom line deed is clearly to contribute to and promote the enjoyment of the challenge of the noble game as well as entertaining, informative, sometimes rough and tumble but always lively and tasteful conversation. We in agreement?
.......................................................................
1 edit
Originally posted by Grampy Bobbynon subs are only invited to play six games at a time, shouldn't their posting privileges reflect that as well?
Note: Orion25, to me this statement suggests the inclusive privilege of equal freedom for all RHP Members & Subscribers to post on any and all of the site's public forums with the same daily initiative and self determination as they are invited to engage in chess.
Originally posted by duecerNo. Do you feel it should? If so, why?
non subs are only invited to play six games at a time, shouldn't their posting privileges reflect that as well?
Can you find me a single website on the entire world wide web that requires people to pay to post on their public forum?
Originally posted by darvlayAgreed! It's only law, medical etc. that require membership before you can access 'private forums. There, you have to prove your qualifications, proffessional references etc., before you are eligible to post.
No. Do you feel it should? If so, why?
Can you find me a single website on the entire world wide web that requires people to pay to post on their public forum?
Can you imagine if all of RHP members had to do that? 😲
We should go that way, Russ.
That would be hilarious! 😀
NOTTT!
All successful entrepreneurs have several things in common: 1) They know that the business of business is business, irrespective of product lines or range of services; 2) They are acutely aware of the fact that their present/potential markets are not static but rather constantly moving targets; 3) They anticipate new and enhanced products and services which will likely have a compelling reason for being (made available) on the near horizon; 4) They do not compete greedily for all the business but rather for all the profitable business demand within the niche their companies serve; 5) They package, price, market, segment and sell accordingly with an evolving big picture commonsense plan. We all know eyeballs and daily hits drive advertising site desirability and annual revenues. Let's defer the RHP Subscriber/Non-Sub mix of privileges to the R & C Cockpit for now.
.....................................................................................
Originally posted by darvlayYes, there is a site which you can not post in a forum if you're not a paying subscriber. I am sure if I know of one there are more. 😉
No. Do you feel it should? If so, why?
Can you find me a single website on the entire world wide web that requires people to pay to post on their public forum?
1 edit
Originally posted by wormwoodPerhaps if you were to quit calling people names like bonehead, you might get along much better with them and they with you! 😉
nah, there's just not much worth reccing. well in gf there isn't. but there's loads of good stuff in the private forums, safe from the pollution of the 2-3 boneheads.
although 95% of it couldn't be posted here because either the robomod or the retard mod would remove it. and in the rare case that wouldn't happen, the boneheads would fill the thread with n at their very best. so did the older guys. and sad thing is I'm not even exaggerating.