05 Jun '23 19:28>
@vespin saidOh dear.
Now that is FUNNY!! lol lol
@vespin saidI think you’re just easily upset by things which go on here and that are outside of your control.
You really are not bright. He gave you the answer snowflake.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThen I can't imagine what you think of Dives posts, which usually are "ALL" below the belt. Nothing wrong with hitting below the belt in a street fight. Or in this case a keyboard warrior. We will have to agree to disagree on this one.
We are all 'real' chess players, irrespective of ability or rating. From memory, Dive put up a pretty good game when I played him, same goes for Rusty.
Criticising someone's chess game, on a chess site, is always below the belt.
@vespin saidJust now you said that I “wasn’t very bright”; would you classify that post by you are being “below the belt”?
Then I can't imagine what you think of Dives posts, which usually are "ALL" below the belt.
@divegeester saidThat made absolutely no sense at all. Not even a little.
I think you’re just easily upset by things which go on here and that are outside of your control.
@vespin saidAnd you say I’m not too bright! 😆
That made absolutely no sense at all. Not even a little.
@divegeester saidNo that was appropriate because I was just simply answering his post. But I also said hitting below the belt is fine where it concerns chess. But I honestly did not mean for it to be nasty. And if that really bothered you then you really are a snowflake. I keep asking you to play two games with me. In fact 4 games. Two regular, and a different opening we can agree on.
Just now you said that I “wasn’t very bright”; would you classify that post by you are being “below the belt”?
@vespin saidI see, because it’s YOU answering someone else’s post, then it ok for you to say what you want.
No that was appropriate because I was just simply answering his post.
@vespin saidThis is your usual rhetoric when you are trying to self-justify your little jabs.
But I honestly did not mean for it to be nasty. And if that really bothered you then you really are a snowflake.
@vespin saidWe didn’t “used to play”, we happened to have a few games years ago. But that was before I realised what toerag you were.
I keep asking you to play two games with me. In fact 4 games. Two regular, and a different opening we can agree on.
We use to play.
@divegeester saidOh, the outrageous irony.
I think you’re just easily upset by things which go on here and that are outside of your control.
@divegeester saidA way of bowing out of a match you know you'll lose. 🙂
We didn’t “used to play”, we happened to have a few games years ago. But that was before I realised what toerag you were.
Not interested.