@fmf saidNo. As above, I went to lengths to ensure the show wasn't compromised. - Not on account of yourself, but on account of the other contributors. The decision to close down your show for a while was not mine or one I requested/anticipated.
"Ramifications"? Are you going to bring a lawsuit and try to get the radio station closed down?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIt was just a light-hearted pseudonym. Why didn't you contact me to say you wanted to use a different one or that you wanted only one story in the show?
The spoonerism thing is a bit of an own goal on your part, as for the first couple of years FMF insisted it was a pseudonym to give the impression more writers were involved. This of course was ludicrous as a pseudonym by design should not be relatable to a persons real name (as a spoonerism is).
@FMF
You seem unable to acknowledge this:
Far from setting out to sabotage your show I went to lengths to ensure it wasn't compromised. MixCloud offered to delete the recorded shows completely, but I asked them simply to splice out my stories and then emailed you in good time, before the next broadcast, giving you the opportunity to plug the gaps left. (Which you did). My direct contact with the Radio show was to ensure that none of my work appeared on future broadcast. I simply had lost trust that you would ensure this.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidMy direct contact with the Radio show was to ensure that none of my work appeared on future broadcast. I simply had lost trust that you would ensure this.
You seem unable to acknowledge this:
Far from setting out to sabotage your show I went to lengths to ensure it wasn't compromised. MixCloud offered to delete the recorded shows completely, but I asked them simply to splice out my stories and then emailed you in good time, before the next broadcast, giving you the opportunity to plug the gaps left. (Which you did). ...[text shortened]... at none of my work appeared on future broadcast. I simply had lost trust that you would ensure this.
Your "direct contact with the radio show" was a preposterous accusatory letter that seemingly purported to be from a government official of some kind.
@fmf saidLet's explore that. Your initial explanation for the name change was that you wanted to give the impression more writers were involved in the show. You stated that clearly.
It was just a light-hearted pseudonym.
Let's assume a contributor was called Dave Perry. Which of the following 2 name changes would lead listeners to believe it was a different contributor:
1 Michael Green (Pseudonym)
2. Pave Derry (Spoonerism)
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSo you didn't like the choice of light-hearted pseudonym. You should have PM'd me about it.
Let's explore that. Your initial explanation for the name change was that you wanted to give the impression more writers were involved in the show. You stated that clearly.
Let's assume a contributor was called Dave Perry. Which of the following 2 name changes would lead listeners to believe it was a different contributor:
1 Michael Green (Pseudonym)
2. Pave Derry (Spoonerism)
1 edit
@ghost-of-a-duke saidBump for FMF
@FMF
You seem unable to acknowledge this:
Far from setting out to sabotage your show I went to lengths to ensure it wasn't compromised. MixCloud offered to delete the recorded shows completely, but I asked them simply to splice out my stories and then emailed you in good time, before the next broadcast, giving you the opportunity to plug the gaps left. (Which yo ...[text shortened]... at none of my work appeared on future broadcast. I simply had lost trust that you would ensure this.
How about you address the substance of the post.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidLet's explore that. Your initial explanation for the name change was that you wanted to give the impression more writers were involved in the show. You stated that clearly.
Let's assume a contributor was called Dave Perry. Which of the following 2 name changes would lead listeners to believe it was a different contributor:
1 Michael Green (Pseudonym)
2. Pave Derry (Spoonerism)
This is why you chose, not the easiest course of action, but instead the most spiteful course of action you could think of?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidDid you send one asking for the pseudonym to be changed?
You weren't responding to PMs or emails, hey?